General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Hold the antioxidants and improve plasma lipids?!

Started by Arbor · · Last activity · 3 posts · 384 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
4 May 2004
Last activity
27 May 2004
Original author
Arbor
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
384
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. At last!

    Arbor

    Public release date: 3-May-2004 Contact: Jennifer Berman
    [email hidden] 212-404-3555 New York University
    Medical Center and School of Medicine

    Could vitamins raise levels of bad cholesterol? Animal study
    suggests they might The notion that antioxidant vitamins
    could provide a safe, convenient way to protect the heart
    from disease appears to have hit a pothole. Instead of
    protecting the heart, a new study suggests that the
    vitamins, such as E, C, and beta carotene, could raise the
    production by the liver of the so-called bad form of
    cholesterol, which transports cholesterol into artery walls.
    The study, led by New York University School of Medicine
    researcher Edward A. Fisher, MD, PhD, the Leon H. Charney
    Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine and Professor of Cell
    Biology, is published in the May issue of the Journal of
    Clinical Investigation.

    "It does appear that antioxidant vitamins may be potentially
    harmful for the heart based on their ability to increase the
    secretion of VLDL in the liver cells and in the mice that we
    studied," says Dr. Fisher, who directs the Lipid Treatment &
    Research Center at NYU Medical Center.

    After its secretion from the liver, VLDL is converted in the
    bloodstream to low-density lipoprotein (LDL), the so-called
    bad form of cholesterol. The liver is the major source of
    atherosclerosis-causing lipoproteins. "However, our study is
    the first to document this association between antioxidant
    vitamins and VLDL cholesterol, and more studies are needed
    to back up our findings," says Dr. Fisher, who is also
    Director of the Marc and Ruti Bell Vascular Biology and
    Disease Research Program at NYU.

    "Until more data becomes available, we can't make any
    recommendations about whether people should not use these
    vitamins," says Dr. Fisher.

    Overall, antioxidants usually have been considered
    healthful. The vitamins scavenge "free radicals," which are
    highly reactive and damaging forms of oxygen produced by
    natural metabolic processes in the body and by external
    sources like the sun's UV rays, ozone, and toxins in
    pesticides, among other things. In the early 1990s,
    laboratory studies suggested that antioxidant vitamins
    prevented biochemical changes that made cholesterol form
    plaques that can block blood flow through the arteries.
    Although some subsequent clinical studies seemed to back up
    these findings, others did not.

    The new study by Dr. Fisher and his colleagues provides a
    different perspective on antioxidants. Surprisingly, his
    group found that antioxidants hampered a process in the
    liver that prevents the production of harmful lipoproteins.

    When cells are under "oxidative stress," free radicals
    produced by the normal conversion of polyunsaturated fatty
    acids to lipid peroxides bombard the cells. The scientists
    discovered that liver cells respond by activating a pathway
    that breaks down ApoB100, a critical protein component of
    VLDL and other harmful lipoproteins. Deprived of the ApoB,
    the liver cannot now produce these bad lipoproteins and
    their secretion into the bloodstream is reduced
    substantially.

    In further experiments, vitamin E, a well-known antioxidant,
    prevented the activation of the lipoprotein-breakdown
    pathway in rat and mouse liver cells. Thus, the liver
    destroyed fewer of the bad lipoproteins.

    The study also explains why polyunsaturated fatty acids, the
    good fatty acids found in cold water fish, are healthy for
    the heart. In another series of experiments, the scientists
    show that omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids activated the
    pathway in the liver that breaks down the bad lipoproteins.
    Dr. Fisher's group recently described this pathway, which
    they dubbed PERPP for post-ER presecretory proteolysis.

    The scientists also found that the polyunsaturated fatty
    acids increased the generation of lipid peroxidation
    products (these compounds produce the nasty smell of rancid
    fish) and stimulated the PERPP pathway. In addition to the
    studies with liver cells in laboratory dishes, they also
    demonstrated the relationship between lipid peroxidation and
    reduced production of bad lipoproteins in living mice.

    Dr. Fisher plans to conduct further experiments in mice to
    confirm these findings. Direct experimentation in people
    to explore the inner workings of the liver is difficult,
    says Dr. Fisher, "but there are already observational
    studies in normal people showing that a diet enriched in
    polyunsaturated fats increases blood levels of lipid
    peroxides and decreases levels of VLDL and LDL."

    Antioxidants may still have beneficial affects on other
    parts of the body, says Dr. Fisher. The molecules, for
    example, have been shown in some animal studies to protect
    the arteries from atherosclerosis and the pancreas and other
    organs from damage caused by diabetes. "In other words,
    oxidant stress is damaging in some contexts, but probably
    beneficial in others," he says. "In terms of the risk of
    cardiovascular disease," he adds, "the previous view that
    all oxidant stress is bad is probably an
    oversimplification."

    In an editorial accompanying the study titled "Hold the
    antioxidants and improve plasma lipids?," Ronald Krauss of
    Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute in
    California, writes, "Thus, although there is considerable
    evidence for the involvement of oxidative stress in many
    disease processes, including atherosclerosis, the potential
    for unintended outcomes of oxidant therapy should serve as a
    warning against proceeding with such treatment in the
    absence of clinical-trial evidence of benefit and safety."

    The new study was supported by grants from the National
    Institutes of Health and the American Diabetes Association.

    Ds. Fisher's co-authors on the study are: Meihui Pan of NYU
    School of Medicine; Arthur Cederbaum of Mount Sinai
    School of Medicine, New York; Yuan-Li Zhang and Henry
    Ginsberg of the College of Physicians and Surgeons,
    Columbia University, New York; and Kevin Jon Williams of
    Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University,
    Philadelphia

  2. [email hidden] (Arbor) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    At last!

    Arbor

    Public release date: 3-May-2004 Contact: Jennifer Berman
    [email hidden] 212-404-3555 New York
    University Medical Center and School of Medicine

    Could vitamins raise levels of bad cholesterol? Animal
    study suggests they might The notion that antioxidant
    vitamins could provide a safe, convenient way to protect
    the heart from disease appears to have hit a pothole.
    Instead of protecting the heart, a new study suggests that
    the vitamins, such as E, C, and beta carotene, could raise
    the production by the liver of the so-called bad form of
    cholesterol, which transports cholesterol into artery
    walls. The study, led by New York University School of
    Medicine researcher Edward A. Fisher, MD, PhD, the Leon H.
    Charney Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine and Professor
    of Cell Biology, is published in the May issue of the
    Journal of Clinical Investigation.

    "It does appear that antioxidant vitamins may be
    potentially harmful for the heart based on their ability
    to increase the secretion of VLDL in the liver cells and
    in the mice that we studied," says Dr. Fisher, who
    directs the Lipid Treatment & Research Center at NYU
    Medical Center.

    Well I just had to laugh when i read that study. It is
    so typical. It shows the utter stupidity of most modern
    medical researchers. Instead of questioning the
    faulting lipid hypothesis they have the nerve to wonder
    if vitamins are actualy BAD for you! I can barely
    comprehend the stupidity here. I can only imagine that
    the pharmaceutical industry is nodding their approval.
    As for me I see absolutely nothing surprising about the
    results of the study. Any rational knowlegeable person
    would come up with a totally different conclusion to
    the research results. Vitamines are GOOD for you! High
    amounts of polyunsaturated oils are BAD for you!
    Nothing new there. The vitamins help the body do what
    it is supposed to, produce cholesterol, a vital
    nutrient and antioxadant. On the other hand high levels
    of unatural refined polyunsaturated oils suppress the
    bodies ability to work the way it was meant to. The
    flawed logic above has always been used to promot
    vegetable oils as heart healthy when they are the
    complete opposite. The level of incompitance of those
    researchers is staggering. That they even failed to
    mention the great importance of cholesterol in growing
    children especially for proper growth and development
    is irresponsible. Perhaps those researchers should find
    a way to genetically altar breast milk to rid it of its
    extremely high levels of cholesterol to protect those
    poor children. There simply is no bad or good
    cholesterol. It is there for a reason and does what it
    is supposed to do and gets unfairly blamed.

  3. Although this study relates to the peripheral artery, I
    can't help thinking that the reason behind the two
    observations might be the same. Arbor

    Public release date: 25-May-2004 [ Print This Article |
    Close This Window ]

    Contact: Maureen Morley [email hidden] 630-590-7754
    Radiological Society of North America

    Carbon monoxide from smoking helps keep arteries open
    following angioplasty OAK BROOK, Ill.-In an unusual paradox,
    smoking cigarettes-a deadly habit that contributes to the
    development of peripheral artery disease-actually helps
    arteries stay open following a procedure to repair clogged
    blood vessels in the legs, according to a study in the June
    issue of Radiology. The study found that habitual to heavy
    smokers who continued to smoke after angioplasty had a lower
    rate of restenosis, or re-narrowing of the arteries, than
    nonsmokers. As expected, the researchers who conducted the
    study at the University of Vienna, Austria, do not advocate
    smoking. But the findings suggest that increasing the level
    of carbon monoxide in the blood stream following angioplasty
    and stent placement within the lower limb arteries may help
    prevent restenosis.

    "Smokers exhibit a higher blood concentration of carbon
    monoxide, a potent anti-inflammatory agent known to dilate
    blood vessels," said the study's lead author, Martin
    Schillinger, M.D., associate professor of internal medicine
    at the University of Vienna Medical School. "Carbon
    monoxide can inhibit the growth of smooth muscle cells
    within the artery wall, which is a key factor in the
    restenosis process."

    In peripheral artery disease (PAD), a narrowing or blockage
    in the arteries causes an insufficient flow of oxygenated
    blood to the arms or legs. Interventional radiologists treat
    PAD with angioplasty, a minimally invasive procedure in
    which a balloon-tipped catheter-a thin, plastic tube-is
    threaded to the site of the blockage and inflated. Often the
    radiologist will place a wire mesh cylinder called a stent
    inside the artery to help prevent it from collapsing or
    becoming clogged again.

    "Angioplasty and stent placement to repair obstructions
    in lower limb vessels have a high rate of restenosis,"
    Dr. Schillinger said. "Up to 60 percent of patients who
    undergo endovascular interventions for PAD will
    experience restenosis and will need to repeat the
    treatment within a year."

    Dr. Schillinger and his research team studied 650 patients
    with PAD who underwent angioplasty with or without stent
    placement to open arteries leading to the legs. Patients
    were classified non-smokers, light smokers (one to nine
    cigarettes a day), habitual smokers (10 to 20 cigarettes
    daily) or heavy smokers (more than 20 cigarettes daily).

    At six months and 12 months after the artery repairs, the
    treatment sites were measured to check for restenosis.
    Researchers observed that patients who smoked 10 or more
    cigarettes a day had a reduced rate of restenosis at both
    intervals. Among the heavy smokers, the rate of re-
    narrowing was 16 percent at six months and 29 percent at
    12 months following the procedure. In the non-smoking
    patients, restenosis rates were 28 percent and 45
    percent, respectively. The results suggest that
    delivering carbon monoxide to the site of the blockage
    could be a promising concept.

    "It is important to find a way to improve the long-term
    effectiveness of lower limb endovascular interventions," Dr.
    Schillinger said. "Using carbon monoxide therapeutically to
    reduce the high rates of restenosis following angioplasty of
    the lower limb arteries may be worth examining."

    Although smoking had a protective effect on newly opened
    arteries, the smokers in the patient group were being
    treated for PAD at a younger age and had higher rates of
    heart attacks and strokes compared to non-smokers.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.