UK and Europe · Public discussion

hill walking

Started by Kim · · Last activity · 53 posts · 3,053 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
1 March 2004
Last activity
5 March 2004
Original author
Kim
Posts
53
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,053
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 53
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. McBain_v1 said:
    Kim said:

    What equipment will i require

    Quoted message said:

    * Rucksack (about 10litre capacity should be enough)

    Do they make them that small?

    I have 5 rucksacks: 25L, 35L, 45L, 50-75L and 70-100L.

    For a six hour summer walk the 25L rucksack just about suffices. Last Saturday and Sunday, winter
    day walking in Snowdonia I managed with the 45L rucksack. A two day summer hike, involving a wild
    camp can be managed with the 50-75L rucksack. A full expedition, lasting several days, including
    camps, would require the 70-100L rucksack.

  2. Soup just had to say

    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    A hill is probably useful as well.

    Arthur

    Bit of a bummer getting it in a rucksack tho'. lol

    --
    Yours S. addy not usable (not that you would try it) ( ) Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam
    suffodiant! / \ www.killies.co.uk/forums/index.php

  3. Soup just had to say <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    Mobile phones usually work on the tops in the Yorkshire Dales (but not in the valleys) and I
    suspect they might most high places in the UK. Always let someone know where you expect to be
    especially if you are alone. I do nearly all of my walking alone on Fridays and especially at this
    time of the year I can often see noone all day. Not great if you twist an ankle.

    The only caveat to that is the number of people who have a GPS aswell, then they 'phone the
    'emergency services' saying where they are but due to the (usually) inherent error with GPS they
    MAY be on the other side of a valley so basic map reading skills are a must. Batteries can and do
    "die" a route card left with the police/MR /a friend is still the preferred option (reduces your
    options on the trail though). Seem to remember there was some research that over a day the shock
    loading to your knees are reduced by 20% if a walking pole is used, I could be wrong with the
    figures but I would say a walking pole is a 'good thing' , if a ski pole must be used the basket
    should be removed.

    --
    Yours S. addy not usable (not that you would try it) ( ) Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam
    suffodiant! / \ www.killies.co.uk/forums/index.php

  4. On 1 Mar 2004 05:40:52 -0800, [email hidden] (kim)

    Quoted message said:

    What equipment will i require

    First, you will need a ring binder to print and keep a copy of this message. Why? So that you can
    pass the Scottish "Higher Still" Education Certificate in IT.

    For those of you in urc not familiar with news:uk.rec.walking , that particular newsgroup has been
    plagued for years by students who need to post a message to a newsgroup and get a response. I must
    apologise if I've got this wrong, but I suspect "kim" is one such student, from Glenrothes College.
    He or she probably has no real interest in hill walking (or cycling)!

    --
    MatSav

  5. Quoted message said:

    What equipment will i require

    A long lead and a well trained hill.

  6. Soup said:
    Quoted message said:

    A hill is probably useful as well.

    Arthur

    Bit of a bummer getting it in a rucksack tho'. lol

    Nah, lots of walker bag a few peaks in a day ;-)

    Tony

  7. Soup said:

    Soup just had to say <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    Mobile phones usually work on the tops in the Yorkshire Dales (but not in the valleys) and I
    suspect they might most high places in the UK. Always let someone know where you expect to be
    especially if you are alone. I do nearly all of my walking alone on Fridays and especially at
    this time of the year I can often see noone all day. Not great if you twist an ankle.

    The only caveat to that is the number of people who have a GPS

    *Shudder*. I can't think of a good reason for using GPS anywhere in the UK when walking or even
    riding for that matter. It's not like you're going fast enough to get lost if you can read a map. If
    you can't read a map enough to localise yourself to within 1 or 200m or so on a 1:25000 map you
    ought to seriously consider figuring out how.

    Admittedly I walk mostly in the Dales which has plenty of landmarks but it's not rocket science. But
    then I'm old fashioned ;-)

    However, if I was trekking anywhere there weren't high quality maps I'd be tempted, although to be
    of any use you have to know good coordinates for the places you want to get to, anyway, which
    implies maps?

    Quoted message said:

    aswell, then they 'phone the 'emergency services' saying where they are but due to the (usually)
    inherent error with GPS they MAY be on the other side of a valley so basic map reading skills
    are a must.

    Surely they're accurate to much less than 100m in the UK even in handheld versions?

    Quoted message said:

    Batteries can and do "die" a route card left with the police/MR /a friend is still the preferred
    option (reduces your options on the trail though). Seem to remember there was some research that
    over a day the shock loading to your knees are reduced by 20% if a walking pole is used, I could
    be wrong with the figures but I would say a walking pole is a 'good thing' , if a ski pole must be
    used the basket should be removed.

  8. Gonzalez <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    For a six hour summer walk the 25L rucksack just about suffices. Last Saturday and Sunday, winter
    day walking in Snowdonia I managed with the 45L rucksack. A two day summer hike, involving a wild
    camp can be managed with the 50-75L rucksack. A full expedition, lasting several days, including
    camps, would require the 70-100L rucksack.

    There are people out there who can do a several day trip with a 35L or smaller rucksack. All I can
    say is they must be very organised, used to hardship and don't have to carry half a ton of extra
    clothing for their wife! :-)

    Graeme

  9. [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by advise against the purchase of those daft "ski-poles" that I've seen some walkers with. If you stumble, you don't want to be flapping around with poles in either hand, you want to be able to get your arms out in front of you!
    [/B][/QUOTE]

    I use daft ski poles and have done ever since I did my winter MLC training and all the Instructors were using them they were very new then ('84 ish) and one definately felt self concious using them.

    They are probably not for everyone but I like them. 'Never had a problem with stumbling while using them, if it looks like I will need my hands on a scramble I just put them away.

    Using them is a skill like any other and they have saved the odd stumble on slippery ground.

    Happy trails

    Steve D

  10. McBain_v1 said:

    Unless you've got some knee problems I would strongly advise against the purchase of those daft
    "ski-poles" that I've seen some walkers with.

    Yeah, that Reinhold Messner doesn't have a clue...

    see personal.dundee.ac.ukpoles.htm for if you might benefit and thoughts on
    how to get the most out of them if you do.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden]
    dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

  11. Trevor Barton said:

    *Shudder*. I can't think of a good reason for using GPS anywhere in the UK when walking or even
    riding for that matter. It's not like you're going fast enough to get lost if you can read a map.
    If you can't read a map enough to localise yourself to within 1 or 200m or so on a 1:25000 map you
    ought to seriously consider figuring out how.

    This assumes the only reason to carry one is not to get lost. It's like saying there's no reason to
    use a cycle computer because they're not necessary to ride from A to B. If you happen to like
    logging information about your journey then that's reason enough in itself to use one.

    Quoted message said:

    However, if I was trekking anywhere there weren't high quality maps I'd be tempted, although to be
    of any use you have to know good coordinates for the places you want to get to, anyway, which
    implies maps?

    Mark a waypoint of where you put your tent in the blizzard-prone wilderness and it'll be a damn site
    easier to find it at the end of the day as the light fails, even if you've no map at all. But you
    also assume you will be trekking. I don't generally use my GPS for walking, but it can be *very*
    handy skiing, where your hands are full, changes of direction to control speed make following a
    bearing difficult and speed is highly variable, all of which make traditional navigation techniques
    much less workable. I also like the GPS in the sea kayak where the "ground" can move underneath me
    and landmarks may all be out of sight.

    Quoted message said:

    Surely they're accurate to much less than 100m in the UK even in handheld versions?

    Yes. Originally the service was deliberately compromised by "Selective Availability" which was built
    in to affect commercially available receivers to prevent their accurate use by non-NATO military
    units, but SA was turned off years ago now and the accuracy is down to a few meters with a handheld
    unit. The more satellites you can "see" and their relative geometry, the better the accuracy of your
    location. Leave it on to help the lock and you'll typically get within 10m.

    Soup said:
    Quoted message said:

    pole is a 'good thing' , if a ski pole must be used the basket should be removed.

    Why? I leave the baskets on mine, stops them sinking into bogs... A full powder basket would get in
    the way, but hardly anyone has them anyway.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden]
    dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

  12. On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:30:18 +0000, Peter Clinch <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Trevor Barton said:

    *Shudder*. I can't think of a good reason for using GPS anywhere in the UK when walking or even
    riding for that matter. It's not like you're going fast enough to get lost if you can read a map.
    If you can't read a map enough to localise yourself to within 1 or 200m or so on a 1:25000 map
    you ought to seriously consider figuring out how.

    This assumes the only reason to carry one is not to get lost. It's like saying there's no reason
    to use a cycle computer because they're not necessary to ride from A to B. If you happen to like
    logging information about your journey then that's reason enough in itself to use one.

    This is exactly why I use one. I've done a few fell races with a GPS in my bumbag and have then
    transformed the data into a plot for no reason other than curiosity. I'm going cycle touring
    later in the year and I'll probably do the same then. The plots isolated from amap can be
    interesting shapes.

    I'd like to use one at orienteering, to record the route taken rather than to navigate, but it means
    finding an open moorland event rather than a forest run, it also means the run not being so
    important that I can't run non-competitively.

    Colin
    --

  13. Trevor Barton said:


    *Shudder*. I can't think of a good reason for using GPS anywhere in the UK when walking or even
    riding for that matter. It's not like you're going fast enough to get lost if you can read a map.
    If you can't read a map enough to localise yourself to within 1 or 200m or so on a 1:25000 map you
    ought to seriously consider figuring out how.


    I've been on some pretty desolate moorlands in fog, rain and wind where I could have got out a paper
    map and dealt with it but it was a lot easier to use the GPS. Its no subsitute for being able to map
    read though

    Tony

  14. Colin Blackburn said:


    Peter Clinch said:
    Trevor Barton said:

    *Shudder*. I can't think of a good reason for using GPS anywhere in the UK when walking or even
    riding for that matter. It's not like you're going fast enough to get lost if you can read a
    map. If you can't read a map enough to localise yourself to within 1 or 200m or so on a 1:25000
    map you ought to seriously consider figuring out how.

    This assumes the only reason to carry one is not to get lost. It's like saying there's no reason
    to use a cycle computer because they're not necessary to ride from A to B. If you happen to like
    logging information about your journey then that's reason enough in itself to use one.

    This is exactly why I use one. I've done a few fell races with a GPS in my bumbag and have then
    transformed the data into a plot for no reason other than curiosity. I'm going cycle touring
    later in the year and I'll probably do the same then. The plots isolated from amap can be
    interesting shapes.

    Indeed.

    gpsdrawing.comgpsdrawing.com

    Though anyone finding they've developed a track log of this nature out in the hills is either very
    drunk, very lost, using a novel search pattern for an avalanche victim or looking for the trig
    pillar on the Ben in a white out (hoping your not going to take an unplanned trip down Gardyloo ;-).

    --
    Alex BMW R1150GS DIAABTCOD#3 MSWF#4 UKRMFBC#6 Ibw#35 BOB#8 team-ukrm.co.ukteam-ukrm.co.uk Windy's
    "little soldier"

  15. On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:44:41 -0000, Alex Ferrier <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Colin Blackburn wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    This is exactly why I use one. I've done a few fell races with a GPS in my bumbag and have then
    transformed the data into a plot for no reason other than curiosity. I'm going cycle touring
    later in the year and I'll probably do the same then. The plots isolated from amap can be
    interesting shapes.

    Indeed.

    gpsdrawing.comgpsdrawing.com

    Though anyone finding they've developed a track log of this nature out in the hills is either
    very drunk, very lost, using a novel search pattern for an avalanche victim or looking for the
    trig pillar on the Ben in a white out (hoping your not going to take an unplanned trip down
    Gardyloo ;-).

    They found Ben, gpsdrawing.combanbury school.htm five or so drawings
    down the page.

    Colin
    --

  16. In article said:
    McBain_v1 said:
    Kim said:

    What equipment will i require

    Quoted message said:

    * Rucksack (about 10litre capacity should be enough)

    Do they make them that small?

    Yes - including ones sold for cycling as basically a water carrier that you can also fit a little
    bit of stuff in, and for children.

    It is small for a hill walking daysack. But there are people who fit everything for a two day
    Mountain Marathon in 20 litre sacs, including tent. Beginners are unlikely to have good expensive
    ultra-lightweight kit though.

  17. Trevor Barton said:

    I guess you can get them that'll download route data to a PC then?

    Or upload things the other way, which is very handy if you want to put a route in to follow in
    advance. To mark a waypoint you'd click it with a mouse in your mapping software and upload it,
    which is much neater than manually entering the grid ref a digit at a time with an interface akin to
    texting on a moby. You'll typically need an optional extra interface cable, and though these are a
    tad overpriced they're not stupidly overpriced.

    Quoted message said:

    How accurate are they in altitude?

    If you just turn it on and ask for an altitude reading as soon as you've got a 2d lock then they're
    hilariously [censored] (testing this out, my house varies in height by up to 100m, including stints below
    sea level!) but if you leave them on (which of course you will if you're data logging) then they do
    rather better. But note that Garmin's Geko 301 unit includes a barometric altimeter as well as plain
    GPS functionality, so if you want altimeter use then something like that will do you better.

    One thing to note if you do decide to get one is that outdoor shops are usually rather more
    expensive. You're better off looking in marine suppliers (GPS has been a commodity item for
    marine navigation for ages now, while they're still A Bit Trendy for the walking crowd) or a
    GPS specialist. GPS Warehouse (gpsw.co.ukgpsw.co.uk) is where I got mine, and a couple for my
    XC ski club.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden]
    dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

  18. On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:44:41 -0000, Alex Ferrier <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    gpsdrawing.comgpsdrawing.com

    Looking further at the site there are some pretty pictures of bike rides combined with HRM data done
    by a Japanese guy:

    gpsdrawing.comhrgps.htm

    Colin
    --

  19. Peter Clinch said:

    GPS Warehouse (gpsw.co.ukgpsw.co.uk) is where I got mine...

    And they're very close to where I live! I didn't need a GPS to find their shop.

    I was given a hand-held GPS as a present. I hunted everywhere for a cable to connect it to my PC -
    then I found that web site! A quick detour on my journey home from work, and I had what I wanted.

    --
    MatSav

  20. "Colin Blackburn" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    They found Ben, gpsdrawing.combanbury school.htm five or so drawings down
    the page.

    No Nasca children in Banbury then?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.