General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Help with interpreting energy substrate utilization test results

Started by username · · Last activity · 4 posts · 333 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
8 December 2004
Last activity
9 December 2004
Original author
username
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
333
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I recently got my metabolic panel done and below are the results of
    the energy substrate utilization test:

    ENERGY SUBSTRATE UTILIZATIONS:

    CARBOHYDRATE 56 g/24h –- 15.5 % OF TOTAL

    FAT 104 g/24h -- 65.0 % OF TOTAL

    PROTEIN 69 g/24h -- 19.7 % OF TOTAL

    I also got diagnosed with impaired fasting glucose.

    Nobody had time to explain these results to me and I didn't want to be
    a bother and refrained from asking any questions.

    Everyone here seems to be very knowledgeable and helpful and I would
    be very thankful if someone would be kind enough as to help me a
    little.

    Could these results indicate that I would do well on a low
    carbohydrate diet, since I don't seem to metabolize carbohydrates very
    efficiently?

    I really haven't got an idea what all of this means--any and all help
    with interpreting these results would be highly appreciated.

    Thank you in advance,
    username

  2. username said:

    energy substrate utilization test

    I don't know the answer to your question. However, here's a website that
    does a utilization test:

    http://www.meredith.edu/hped/ess/lab/hplpage/endurance_testing.htm

    It has an interesting chart of carbohydrate usage versus heart rate for
    aerobic exercise.

    How do your results compare to this person's?

    Bob in CT

  3. A low carb diet can make fasting glucose tests look better.

    I'm not familiar with the rest, but it sounds interesting. What country are
    you in?

    "username" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I recently got my metabolic panel done and below are the results of
    the energy substrate utilization test:

    ENERGY SUBSTRATE UTILIZATIONS:

    CARBOHYDRATE 56 g/24h -- 15.5 % OF TOTAL

    FAT 104 g/24h -- 65.0 % OF TOTAL

    PROTEIN 69 g/24h -- 19.7 % OF TOTAL

    I also got diagnosed with impaired fasting glucose.

    Nobody had time to explain these results to me and I didn't want to be
    a bother and refrained from asking any questions.

    Everyone here seems to be very knowledgeable and helpful and I would
    be very thankful if someone would be kind enough as to help me a
    little.

    Could these results indicate that I would do well on a low
    carbohydrate diet, since I don't seem to metabolize carbohydrates very
    efficiently?

    I really haven't got an idea what all of this means--any and all help
    with interpreting these results would be highly appreciated.

    Thank you in advance,
    username

  4. On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:04:23 -0500, Bob in CT <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On 8 Dec 2004 12:34:50 -0800, username <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    energy substrate utilization test

    I don't know the answer to your question. However, here's a website
    that does a utilization test:

    http://www.meredith.edu/hped/ess/lab/hplpage/endurance_testing.htm

    It has an interesting chart of carbohydrate usage versus heart rate for
    aerobic exercise.

    How do your results compare to this person's?

    Bob in CT

    Also, if your test was done resting, then it doesn't really mean much (and
    I don't even know if the tests shown above mean much, although I'd like to
    see what my curve looks like). People typically burn more fat at lower
    intensity. Also, low carb is great for insulin response and blood glucose.

    --
    Bob M
    remove ".x" to reply

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.