General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Help With Famous Anatomical Location Required

Started by Paul Seaton · · Last activity · 2 posts · 460 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
24 January 2004
Last activity
26 January 2004
Original author
Paul Seaton
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
460
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi

    I am looking for as many qualified opinions as possible as to the language that would / should /
    could be used to describe the location of this bone defect in a human skull :

    chaingangcharlie.pwp.blueyonder.co.ukdox post pt.jpg

    ( Imagine you are trying to convey this location to another doctor over the telephone )

    This relates to a well known case, but I'd rather just get the opinions than any discussion of
    that case :-)

    Thanks in advance,

    Paul Seaton

    reply here or to

    [email hidden]

    ( remove RMV for valid email)

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Paul Seaton said:

    Hi

    I am looking for as many qualified opinions as possible as to the language that would / should /
    could be used to describe the location of this bone defect in a human skull :

    chaingangcharlie.pwp.blueyonder.co.ukdox post pt.jpg

    ( Imagine you are trying to convey this location to another doctor over the telephone )

    This relates to a well known case, but I'd rather just get the opinions than any discussion of
    that case :-)

    Thanks in advance,

    Paul Seaton

    reply here or to

    [email hidden]

    ( remove RMV for valid email)

    This lesion was very well described before:

    Damasio H, Grabowski T, Frank R, Galaburda AM, Damasio AR. The return of Phineas Gage: clues about
    the brain from the skull of a famous patient. Science. 1994 May 20; 264(5162): 1102-5. Erratum in:
    Science 1994 Aug 26;265(5176):1159.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.