UK and Europe · Public discussion

Head protection - research material

Started by Matt B · · Last activity · 3 posts · 483 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
16 November 2005
Last activity
17 November 2005
Original author
Matt B
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
483
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Whilst researching something else (!) I came across the full PDF[1] of the
    publication "Trends in helmet use and head injuries in San Diego County: The
    effect of bicycle helmet legislation" by Mig Ji, et al., the contents of
    which may be of interest to those of you who haven't already seen it.

    The clincher may be in premise of the last sentence of the abstract :-)

    - "Probably due to several of its limitations, the current study did not
    confirm that helmet legislation
    alone significantly reduced head injury rates in San Diego County during the
    study period."

    [1] http://tinyurl.com/89kd7

    --
    Matt B

  2. "Matt B" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Whilst researching something else (!) I came across the full PDF[1] of the
    publication "Trends in helmet use and head injuries in San Diego County:
    The effect of bicycle helmet legislation" by Mig Ji, et al., the contents
    of which may be of interest to those of you who haven't already seen it.

    The clincher may be in premise of the last sentence of the abstract :-)

    - "Probably due to several of its limitations, the current study did not
    confirm that helmet legislation
    alone significantly reduced head injury rates in San Diego County during
    the study period."

    But, just to show that the authors were completely unbiased, I think the
    previous sentence should be included "Helmet use has a protective effect
    against serious head injury.".

    Quoted message said:


    [1] http://tinyurl.com/89kd7

    --
    Matt B

  3. Rich said:

    "Matt B" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Whilst researching something else (!) I came across the full PDF[1] of the
    publication "Trends in helmet use and head injuries in San Diego County:
    The effect of bicycle helmet legislation" by Mig Ji, et al., the contents
    of which may be of interest to those of you who haven't already seen it.

    The clincher may be in premise of the last sentence of the abstract :-)

    - "Probably due to several of its limitations, the current study did not
    confirm that helmet legislation
    alone significantly reduced head injury rates in San Diego County during
    the study period."

    But, just to show that the authors were completely unbiased, I think the
    previous sentence should be included "Helmet use has a protective effect
    against serious head injury.".

    One also wonders if they actually read any of the papers they cite.
    The LeBlanc et al 92002) study managed to show that that in their areas
    of Nova Scotia, the law increased injury rates while reducing the
    number of cyclists by a bit over 50%. 🙁

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.