Whilst researching something else (!) I came across the full PDF[1] of the publication "Trends in helmet use and head injuries in San Diego County: The effect of bicycle helmet legislation" by Mig Ji, et al., the contents of which may be of interest to those of you who haven't already seen it.
The clincher may be in premise of the last sentence of the abstract :-)
- "Probably due to several of its limitations, the current study did not confirm that helmet legislation alone significantly reduced head injury rates in San Diego County during the study period."
"Matt B" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Whilst researching something else (!) I came across the full PDF[1] of the publication "Trends in helmet use and head injuries in San Diego County: The effect of bicycle helmet legislation" by Mig Ji, et al., the contents of which may be of interest to those of you who haven't already seen it.
The clincher may be in premise of the last sentence of the abstract :-)
- "Probably due to several of its limitations, the current study did not confirm that helmet legislation alone significantly reduced head injury rates in San Diego County during the study period."
But, just to show that the authors were completely unbiased, I think the previous sentence should be included "Helmet use has a protective effect against serious head injury.".
"Matt B" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Whilst researching something else (!) I came across the full PDF[1] of the publication "Trends in helmet use and head injuries in San Diego County: The effect of bicycle helmet legislation" by Mig Ji, et al., the contents of which may be of interest to those of you who haven't already seen it.
The clincher may be in premise of the last sentence of the abstract :-)
- "Probably due to several of its limitations, the current study did not confirm that helmet legislation alone significantly reduced head injury rates in San Diego County during the study period."
But, just to show that the authors were completely unbiased, I think the previous sentence should be included "Helmet use has a protective effect against serious head injury.".
One also wonders if they actually read any of the papers they cite. The LeBlanc et al 92002) study managed to show that that in their areas of Nova Scotia, the law increased injury rates while reducing the number of cyclists by a bit over 50%. 🙁