Now here's an interesting opinion piece from today's Age:
<http://www.theage.com.au/news/business/paved-with-good-intentions/2005/0
9/26/1127586799474.html>.
Apparently Doyle hasn't gone far enough on EastLink:
"Surely a Doyle government could generate annual savings of $100-$200
million from this huge public transport expenditure to pay for these
reduced tolls instead of shaving other government expenditures ‹ not
only for five years but for the lifetime of the project. Metropolitan
roads, which take over 90 per cent of passenger traffic and all business
traffic, only get $436 million in the 2004-05 budget, so it should be an
economic imperative to reduce these annual public transport expenditures
of $1.526 billion for just 8 per cent of passenger traffic."
Ah, yes -- "economic imperative". Discuss...
--
Shane Stanley