Style "guru" Dylan Jones in today's Mail on Sunday, just a few months after the usual "lycra louts" diatribe. I always knew it was envy that fuelled his vitriol. :-) BTW this is with a digital camera, not my usual scanner, so the image is a bit dodgy. 18 miles of cycling is 2 weeks of exercise for him? - no wonder!
Style "guru" Dylan Jones in today's Mail on Sunday, just a few months after the usual "lycra louts" diatribe. I always knew it was envy that fuelled his vitriol. :-) BTW this is with a digital camera, not my usual scanner, so the image is a bit dodgy. 18 miles of cycling is 2 weeks of exercise for him? - no wonder!
Thanks for posting that. It's quite a good article, but not enough to make me want to buy the Mail.
The last time I was cycling in France, we saw very few cyclists under about 50. I'd hate to think that cycling is dying out as a pastime, but maybe the old guys are the last that are left.
Style "guru" Dylan Jones in today's Mail on Sunday, just a few months after the usual "lycra louts" diatribe. I always knew it was envy that fuelled his vitriol. :-)
Columnists are paid to have strong views, interestingly expressed.
As such, careful consideration of both sides of an argument is not a priority.
It's also common to express unambiguous views that they don't actually believe.
Given this, it's unsurprising (and common) for a columnist to present a subsequent argument inconsistent with an earlier one.