Road Cycling · Public discussion

Hamilton Jan. 10th

Started by B. Lafferty · · Last activity · 5 posts · 371 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
21 November 2005
Last activity
23 November 2005
Original author
B. Lafferty
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
371
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. CAS hearing in Denver.
    http://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/20051121_123744Dev.html

  2. B. Lafferty said:

    CAS hearing in Denver.
    http://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/20051121_123744Dev.html

    From:
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=features/2005/hamilton_appeal

    The day before Hamilton was set to defend his crown at Liège,
    Hamilton's 'off-score' [see seperate story: 'Anti-doping measures get
    tougher'] measured 123.8. Normal values should be somewhere between 85
    and 95, with the cut-off at 133. The then 33 year-old finished a
    credible ninth in the race, 12 seconds behind Italy's Davide Rebellin.
    On April 27, a few days later at start of the Tour de Romandie - a race
    where he successfully defended his title - it was up to 132.9, with a
    corresponding haematocrit level of 49.7 percent (the cut-off being 50).

    "And if we have to calculate the [Stimulation] Index, we will use the
    lower value of the haemoglobin and the higher value of reticulocytes,
    also in order to give the higher level of guarantee to the athlete. If,
    at anytime, the combination of haemoglobin and reticulocytes, the
    result is equal to or lower than 133, he will be stopped."

    Be interesting to see what else comes out.
    Bill C

  3. "Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    B. Lafferty said:

    CAS hearing in Denver.
    http://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/20051121_123744Dev.html

    From:
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=features/2005/hamilton_appeal

    Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz, *snort*, [talk in sleep],
    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

    F- Hamilton. Two different sets of test have to be wrong for him to be
    innocent. Santi Perez and Tyler were in cahoots.

  4. "Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    B. Lafferty said:

    CAS hearing in Denver.
    http://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/20051121_123744Dev.html

    From:
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=features/2005/hamilton_appeal

    The day before Hamilton was set to defend his crown at Liège,
    Hamilton's 'off-score' [see seperate story: 'Anti-doping measures get
    tougher'] measured 123.8. Normal values should be somewhere between 85
    and 95, with the cut-off at 133. The then 33 year-old finished a
    credible ninth in the race, 12 seconds behind Italy's Davide Rebellin.
    On April 27, a few days later at start of the Tour de Romandie - a race
    where he successfully defended his title - it was up to 132.9, with a
    corresponding haematocrit level of 49.7 percent (the cut-off being 50).

    "And if we have to calculate the [Stimulation] Index, we will use the
    lower value of the haemoglobin and the higher value of reticulocytes,
    also in order to give the higher level of guarantee to the athlete. If,
    at anytime, the combination of haemoglobin and reticulocytes, the
    result is equal to or lower than 133, he will be stopped."

    Be interesting to see what else comes out.
    Bill C

    Tugboat is really [censored] and Haven is in hiding.

  5. B. Lafferty said:

    and Haven is in hiding.


    with Magilla presumably.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.