UK and Europe · Public discussion

Gutter journalism. Read the comments, some good stuff there.

Started by spindrift · · Last activity · 3 posts · 419 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
3 November 2006
Last activity
4 November 2006
Original author
spindrift
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
419
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/erinbaker/nov06/cyclistneverwrong.htm

    Why the cyclist is never wrong
    Posted by Erin Baker at 02 Nov 06 14:00
    Tags: London, cycling, Motoring, road-rage, car, motorbike
    I've been watching the antics of other bikers on London's roads this
    week and getting steadily angrier.

    A poor motorist gets a dose of bike rage

    Take the Embankment, without doubt the most congested road in the
    capital in terms of cyclists, scooterists and big bike riders.

    Stop at traffic lights for more than a second in your car, and you are
    surrounded.

    Big bikes in front of me don't normally cause a problem: they have the
    power to get away from the lights before me, and their riders just seem
    more adept at roadcraft - they're aware of what's around them, they
    have their eyes on the lights, waiting for them to change, and they
    accelerate away smoothly and quickly.

    People on scooters are more problematic. They'll happily draw up in
    front of the first car at the lights, even if it's a supercar, because
    they somehow think that purely by being on two wheels they have better
    acceleration than all cars.

    Nine out of 10 scooterists aren't wearing any protective clothing other
    than a helmet; in fact, the worst offenders, I'm afraid to say, are
    women, because most appear to ride scooters while wearing stilettoes -
    not great if they fall off, and not even great for simply putting their
    feet down at the lights.

    And when the lights turn to green, half the time they aren't even
    looking at them, so you are forced to wait for them to get their act
    together, even though you got there before them and probably have way
    more power than them.

    I'm sure when I was doing my CBT, my instructor said that the Highway
    Code stipulates that riders must not draw up beyond the first car in
    the queue - they have to slot in between the first and second, although
    maybe I've got that wrong, and for most big bikers, at the front is the
    most sensible place to be.

    The worst offenders though, by such a long way it's laughable, are
    cyclists. They are, for the most part dangerous, irresponsible
    road-users who nonetheless take the moral high ground at all times
    because they're not polluting the atmosphere.

    Time and time again, I see cyclists use cars to push off against when
    squeezing through gaps in the traffic that aren't there.

    Last night, I saw one push off a car with his foot, and when the
    passenger leant out of the window to ask him not to do it, he stuck two
    fingers up and said cars should get off the roads.

    Every night, I see cyclists without reflective clothing speeding up the
    inside of my lane and coming to rest in front of me at the lights. When
    I pull away, I have to wait for them to set off, check my right wing
    mirror, signal right and wait for a passing car to let me pull out and
    round the cyclist before I can go back into my lane.

    If I pulled up in front of a cyclist in my car at lights, even though
    he/she was there before me, then stopped, thus forcing him or her to
    pull out and go round me when the lights changed, the cyclist would
    give me untold grief.

    But because I'm in a polluting vehicle, I must be apologetic and do
    everything I can to assist the cyclist. Forget it.

    End.

    What a silly, silly cow.

    The comments seem to have rattled her cage too:

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/erinbaker/nov06/worldwarthree.htm#comments

    This blog is primarily concerned with motorcycling, so I'll keep my
    response to the outraged comments on my anti-cyclist posting as short
    as possible, and then we are MOVING ON.

    A safe cyclist

    First of all, I'm a motoring journalist, and have to collect test cars
    from central London every week, which is why I drive through the city.
    Believe me, I'd prefer to take public transport.

    Second, I realise that the more people get out of their cars and onto
    their bicycles, the greater the benefit to us all in terms of the
    future of our planet, but I'm afraid I'm not going to take up your
    suggestion of cycling in London on account of having already increased
    my risk of significant injury through choosing to ride a motorbike, and
    not wishing to double it.

    The obvious answer to the stand-off twixt cyclist and motorist is that
    councils need to make better provisions for cyclists - wider lanes,
    more of them, etc. We all agree there.

    In the meantime though, motorists are not going to go away, or be
    intimidated, so there's no point in cyclists starting World War Three
    and there's certainly no point in cyclists taking more and more risks
    that endanger other road-users and pedestrians, such as ignoring red
    lights or hopping on and off the pavement (yes, I've seen it happen -
    why the hell does everyone think I'm just making things up? Because I'm
    a mini Jeremy Clarkson and just love winding people up? Funnily enough,
    no - it's not the best fun reading blindingly angry comments).

    Of course there are thousands of rubbish drivers out there, who wind me
    up as much as cyclists do, by never looking in their mirrors or
    checking their blind spots, and who are aggressive, dangerous and
    confrontational - I'm sure I'll come across plenty more when I take
    possession of my motorbike. And yes, I've seen plenty of buses crush
    innocent cyclists against the kerb.

    I also know that there are safe cyclists out there who, as Lara
    commented, "sees him/herself as part of the traffic and behaves
    accordingly". But there are too many nutters intent on waging war with
    any motorist who dares answer back for what they perceive to be a
    dangerous manoeuvre on the cyclist's part.

    To the gentleman who found my line "I see cyclists without reflective
    clothing speeding up the inside of my lane" hilariously nonsensical:
    yes, that's right, I see cyclists without reflective clothing just as
    they come up to my car's offside door, and not from several feet away,
    which would give me a much better chance of avoiding them.

    Finally, the point of my blog is not to go on a fact-finding mission
    before I file (and there are always facts to suit both sides of the
    argument), but to share honestly my experiences with you, and my daily
    experience of cyclists on the road is not a positive one.

    How am I a misinformed, biased ogre for simply reporting my experience?
    If it's not an experience shared by any of you, then that is most
    strange, I agree, but I ain't making this stuff up, and I know there
    are plenty of other motorists who are sick to the back teeth with some
    cyclists' behaviour.

    Enough of this whingeing; back onto happier subjects next time.

    Posted by Erin Baker at 03 Nov 06 10:44

  2. Quoted message said:

    but I'm afraid I'm not going to take up your
    suggestion of cycling in London on account of having already increased
    my risk of significant injury through choosing to ride a motorbike, and
    not wishing to double it.

    Um, wouldn't switching from motorcycle to pedal cycle more than halve this
    risk?


  3. Quoted message said:


    Finally, the point of my blog is not to go on a fact-finding mission
    before I file (and there are always facts to suit both sides of the
    argument), but to share honestly my experiences with you, and my daily
    experience of cyclists on the road is not a positive one.

    Thanks for posting this.

    Oh, that's classic. No, there's never any way of getting to bottom of an
    argument or establishing facts to an acceptable level of certainty... so,
    just make things up in an entirely stream of consciousness style to
    express how you feel about the issue from moment to moment. That's the
    real truth.

    --
    ***My real address is m/ike at u/nmusic d/ot co dot u/k (removing /s)
    http://www.unmusic.co.uk - about me, music, geek sitcom etc.
    http://www.unmusic.co.uk/amhs/ - alt.music.home-studio

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.