UK and Europe · Public discussion

Glasgow Grand Prix

Started by Kennedy Fraser · · Last activity · 3 posts · 327 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
30 August 2005
Last activity
30 August 2005
Original author
Kennedy Fraser
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
327
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Greetings

    Attended the City Centre Crit last night. This was as a sort of hors
    d'heuvres for the start of the Tour of Britain this morning. Although
    there was a notice on the website saying that the presentation of the
    teams would take place before the race, this was cancelled due to a
    forecast of inclement weather!! (Blue sky and sunshine is what we got!).

    Anyway on to the racing - exciting stuff, some of the speeds going in to
    the right-handers at the end of George Square were impressive. Congrats
    to the local boys who were able to stay with the peleton. There were
    some painful expressions on those dropped off the back of the peleton.

    However, I didn't quite understand a couple of aspects of the race and
    hopefully someone here can shed some light on the situations.

    Fairly early in the race there was a two man breakaway (rider from
    Navigators and one from Recycling). They stretched out a half lap gap
    on the peleton and began lapping the slower riders. The commentator
    pointed out that once you had been lapped you should retire - which
    people were doing. However, they eventually caught the peleton. Should
    riders in the peleton not have dropped out as well as they were
    caught, or is there a different rule for the peleton?

    During the breakaway, the navigators and recycling riders were half a
    lap ahead and steaming along. We were positioned near the start/finish
    line and the next time around only the Navigator rider came through. We
    did not see the recycling rider until the leader came round again with
    the recycling rider with him again (but presumably a lap behind).
    Unless, of course, he came through with the peleton and jumped the gap
    between the lone breakaway and the peleton in the space of (less than) a
    lap - unlikely I think. So at the end of the race the peleton raced for
    5 laps for the third place honours and then the two that had
    (apparently) lapped the peleton raced for an additional two laps to
    decide the winner. But if the recycling rider was a lap behind, how was
    that allowed?

    Puzzled of Lenzie!

    Kennedy

  2. Kennedy Fraser said:

    But if the recycling rider was a lap behind, how was
    that allowed?

    You're generally allowed to take a lap out if you puncture. Was that
    what happened in this case?

    --
    Dave...

  3. dkahn400 said:
    Kennedy Fraser said:

    But if the recycling rider was a lap behind, how was
    that allowed?

    You're generally allowed to take a lap out if you puncture. Was that
    what happened in this case?

    Yes, there was some mention of mechanical problem or a puncture.

    This explains it. Some mention of this by the commentator might have
    made things a bit clearer.

    Thanks for the info.

    Kennedy

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.