Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Giro, Vuelta, Le Tour

Started by Brendo · · Last activity · 3 posts · 554 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
23 February 2007
Last activity
24 February 2007
Original author
Brendo
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
554
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Who owns the right to hold these races? From what I can
    understand, the newly formed UCI bought or was given the rights
    to run a heap of races around the world, in the name of unified
    governance, and called it the Pro Tour.

    Those who own the three grand tours (is that the right
    terminology?) would rather hold onto that right than join the
    unified cycling body.

    Is there significant money to be made from holding the tours? Or
    is it more of a 'We've always done it, no one can do it better
    (or tell us we aren't doing it that well)'.

    Do teams have to be registered with the UCI to enter a Pro Tour
    event?

    Who decides how many teams can enter an event? How are they
    selected? What if a team changes owners, are they a new team or
    the continuance of an old team? How does the TDU get to be on the
    Pro Tour?

    It's puzzling.

    Brendo

  2. Here is cyclingnews take on almost the entire history of this dispute

    tinyurl.com2txzwn
    - a perfect bit of light reading for your afternoon recovery session 😄

  3. monsterman said:

    Here is cyclingnews take on almost the entire history of this dispute

    *http://tinyurl.com/2txzwn*
    - a perfect bit of light reading for your afternoon recovery session 😄


    Recovery from a late night!! Missed the ride the morning, young
    fella was up before I could leave!!

    So let me see if this is correct.

    Each nations cycling federation ran it's own collection of races.

    They collaborated so that the timing of races meshed with
    everyone elses schedules.

    The UCI came along with the intention of unifying the races, so
    there would be one set of heirarchy to deal with, and to make one
    large promotional and advertising body worldwide.

    The independant nations said 'Yay. This is good for cycling in
    the big picture. Lets go ahead with this Pro Tour thingo.

    Then they realised they would be losing money, power, or both.

    And they got their backs up and are now making it impossible to
    unify the sport under one body worldwide.

    Is it that simple? My backyard vs the big picture?

    Brendo

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.