General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

German Pope

Started by David Cohen · · Last activity · 43 posts · 927 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
19 April 2005
Last activity
21 April 2005
Original author
David Cohen
Posts
43
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
927
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 43
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Neil Gendzwill said:
    Charles said:
    David Cohen said:

    So, they elected Ratzinger, a German, as Pope. I guess this means


    my annual

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Easter apology wasn't accepted 🙁

    Well you surely weren't expecting the Israeli cardinal to be


    elected

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    David - were you? ;o)

    Great, another ultra-traditionalist knob (Ratzinger, that is). In


    other

    Quoted message said:

    surprising news, the pope remains Catholic.

    Everyone suspected a German inquisitor.

    Travis

  2. "Travis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Neil Gendzwill said:
    Charles said:

    On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:14:14 GMT, "David Cohen"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >So, they elected Ratzinger, a German, as Pope. I guess this means


    my annual

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >Easter apology wasn't accepted 🙁

    Well you surely weren't expecting the Israeli cardinal to be


    elected

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    David - were you? ;o)

    Great, another ultra-traditionalist knob (Ratzinger, that is). In


    other

    Quoted message said:

    surprising news, the pope remains Catholic.

    Everyone suspected a German inquisitor.

    But no one expects the Spanish inquisition.

    -JS2

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Neil Gendzwill said:
    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    Wonder what he will call himself?
    Pope John Paul the III? ;-)

    Benedict XVI, I believe.

    Neil

    Yeah, I'd not listened to the radio yet.
    I tune in to NPR usually, as I almost never watch
    television.
    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Will Brink said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    The Dirty Vicar said:

    "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:33:00 -0600, Neil Gendzwill
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >Charles wrote:
    >> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:14:14 GMT, "David Cohen"
    >> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>>So, they elected Ratzinger, a German, as Pope. I guess this means my
    >>>annual
    >>>Easter apology wasn't accepted 🙁
    >>
    >>
    >> Well you surely weren't expecting the Israeli cardinal to be elected
    >> David - were you? ;o)
    >
    >Great, another ultra-traditionalist knob (Ratzinger, that is). In other
    >surprising news, the pope remains Catholic.

    The commentator on BBC Television actually said that Pope Benedict XVI
    is committed to the concept of Jesus Christ!!

    that is excellent! i understand he's for Charity too.

    And saying no to gay marriage when most of the catholic church is made
    up of gay men. Hypocritical BS, that¹s what it is.

    Heheheh!!!
    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  5. John Hanson said:

    On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:20:10 -0400, Will Brink
    <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    The Dirty Vicar said:

    "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:33:00 -0600, Neil Gendzwill
    > <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    >>Charles wrote:
    >>> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:14:14 GMT, "David Cohen"
    >>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>So, they elected Ratzinger, a German, as Pope. I guess this means my
    >>>>annual
    >>>>Easter apology wasn't accepted 🙁
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Well you surely weren't expecting the Israeli cardinal to be elected
    >>> David - were you? ;o)
    >>
    >>Great, another ultra-traditionalist knob (Ratzinger, that is). In other
    >>surprising news, the pope remains Catholic.
    >
    > The commentator on BBC Television actually said that Pope Benedict XVI
    > is committed to the concept of Jesus Christ!!

    that is excellent! i understand he's for Charity too.

    And saying no to gay marriage when most of the catholic church is made
    up of gay men. Hypocritical BS, that¹s what it is.

    I had an ex-priest tell me that half of all priests are [censored] and the
    other half are alcoholics. He happened to be both.

    It seems to me to be the right profession for a homosexual given the
    strict rules on celibacy, but only if they remain celibate.

    Given the scandals concerning the priesthood and crimes against
    children, then it would appear that the profession has been a refuge
    for many perverted people that should be locked up.

    With the knowledge that many professed Christians don't believe in God
    or Jesus, it is little wonder that they seek solace in the bottle.

    As a sadly lapsed Roman Catholic, as the result of my own inability to
    recognise a supreme being, I know their anguish!!

  6. John Hanson said:

    On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:08:28 -0400, Will Brink
    <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Neil Gendzwill said:

    OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:

    > Wonder what he will call himself?
    > Pope John Paul the III? ;-)

    Benedict XVI, I believe.

    Why? I don't get that part, the name change.


    I don't get why he did a XVI name. He should have picked a unique
    name, not one that 15 other people had. My first choice would have
    been Pope Fiction I with Pope Arie I as my second choice.

    Perhaps a modern Pope Wayne the 1st, or even an older Pope Elvis the
    1st, would be more appropriate.

    I too fail to see why he wanted to be a 16th something!!

  7. ">

    Quoted message said:

    It seems to me to be the right profession for a homosexual given the
    strict rules on celibacy, but only if they remain celibate.

    + I know no gay men that are celibate. How does the celibate part make it
    right for gays?

    Quoted message said:

    Given the scandals concerning the priesthood and crimes against
    children, then it would appear that the profession has been a refuge
    for many perverted people that should be locked up.

    + Gay being equated with perverted? Hmmm, the poster seems a bit confused.

    Quoted message said:

    With the knowledge that many professed Christians don't believe in God
    or Jesus, it is little wonder that they seek solace in the bottle.

    + Christians not believing in God or Jesus. That's a new one.

    Quoted message said:


    As a sadly lapsed Roman Catholic, as the result of my own inability to
    recognise a supreme being, I know their anguish!!

    + Ahhh, that's sad. Everyone should have some faith.


  8. Quoted message said:


    Everyone suspected a German inquisitor.

    + They say he's a rationalist. Maybe we can bring back the Inquisition?

  9. WooferBearATL said:


    ">

    Quoted message said:

    It seems to me to be the right profession for a homosexual given the
    strict rules on celibacy, but only if they remain celibate.

    + I know no gay men that are celibate.

    I do, including some priests.

    Quoted message said:

    How does the celibate part make it right for gays?

    Because the Roman Catholic Church considers such lifestyles to be
    sinful, so it will assist such clerics in the observance of their
    faith!!

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Given the scandals concerning the priesthood and crimes against
    children, then it would appear that the profession has been a refuge
    for many perverted people that should be locked up.

    + Gay being equated with perverted?

    That's not what I said, I mentioned only "crimes against children"!!

    However, I do consider homosexuality a perversion, not only because of
    my Catholic upbringing, but because the whole scene revolts me.

    I am sympathetic to their dilemma, and recognise their right to
    achieve as much happiness as they are able, but I do wish they would
    do it in a much more modest and discreet manner.

    Quoted message said:

    Hmmm, the poster seems a bit confused.

    I have been accused of many things here, but no-one has suggested that
    I am "confused"!! ;o)

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    With the knowledge that many professed Christians don't believe in God
    or Jesus, it is little wonder that they seek solace in the bottle.

    + Christians not believing in God or Jesus. That's a new one.

    Unfortunately, that is not so. Many high ranking churchmen, including
    the late Bishop of Durham categorically deny the Resurrection, and
    some are like myself, complete Agnostics, although I remain a
    'hopeful' if pragmatic Agnostic!!

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    As a sadly lapsed Roman Catholic, as the result of my own inability to
    recognise a supreme being, I know their anguish!!

    + Ahhh, that's sad. Everyone should have some faith.

    It is very sad, and sometimes very depressing in its hopelessness.

    It would be of enormous advantage Woofer if you would include some
    header information, even if it were only with reference to whom you
    are responding!! ;o)

  10. WooferBearATL said:
    Quoted message said:


    Everyone suspected a German inquisitor.

    + They say he's a rationalist. Maybe we can bring back the


    Inquisition?

    The Inquisition never actually went anywhere, it just got a new name.

    Up until yesterday it was run by you-know-who.

    http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_pro_14071997_en.html

    Travis

  11. In article <[email hidden]>,

    John Hanson said:

    On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:20:10 -0400, Will Brink
    <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    The Dirty Vicar said:

    "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:33:00 -0600, Neil Gendzwill
    > <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    >>Charles wrote:
    >>> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:14:14 GMT, "David Cohen"
    >>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>So, they elected Ratzinger, a German, as Pope. I guess this means my
    >>>>annual
    >>>>Easter apology wasn't accepted 🙁
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Well you surely weren't expecting the Israeli cardinal to be elected
    >>> David - were you? ;o)
    >>
    >>Great, another ultra-traditionalist knob (Ratzinger, that is). In other
    >>surprising news, the pope remains Catholic.
    >
    > The commentator on BBC Television actually said that Pope Benedict XVI
    > is committed to the concept of Jesus Christ!!

    that is excellent! i understand he's for Charity too.

    And saying no to gay marriage when most of the catholic church is made
    up of gay men. Hypocritical BS, that¹s what it is.

    I had an ex-priest tell me that half of all priests are [censored] and the
    other half are alcoholics. He happened to be both.

    My sister got her masters in theology at a catholic college and told me
    about the gay culture within the sytem there and many other places
    (churches, etc) she dealt with. Many straight would be priests quit
    because they felt they were actually being excluded due to the gay
    culture there. As usual, the Catholic church needs to clean its own
    house before passing any judgment on how others live.

    --
    Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/

  12. Will Brink said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    John Hanson said:

    On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:20:10 -0400, Will Brink
    <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    "The Dirty Vicar" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:[email hidden]...
    > > On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:33:00 -0600, Neil Gendzwill
    > > <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > >
    > >>Charles wrote:
    > >>> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:14:14 GMT, "David Cohen"
    > >>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>>So, they elected Ratzinger, a German, as Pope. I guess this means my
    > >>>>annual
    > >>>>Easter apology wasn't accepted 🙁
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>> Well you surely weren't expecting the Israeli cardinal to be elected
    > >>> David - were you? ;o)
    > >>
    > >>Great, another ultra-traditionalist knob (Ratzinger, that is). In other
    > >>surprising news, the pope remains Catholic.
    > >
    > > The commentator on BBC Television actually said that Pope Benedict XVI
    > > is committed to the concept of Jesus Christ!!
    >
    > that is excellent! i understand he's for Charity too.

    And saying no to gay marriage when most of the catholic church is made
    up of gay men. Hypocritical BS, that¹s what it is.

    I had an ex-priest tell me that half of all priests are [censored] and the
    other half are alcoholics. He happened to be both.

    My sister got her masters in theology at a catholic college and told me
    about the gay culture within the sytem there and many other places
    (churches, etc) she dealt with. Many straight would be priests quit
    because they felt they were actually being excluded due to the gay
    culture there. As usual, the Catholic church needs to clean its own
    house before passing any judgment on how others live.

    But if we are to believe the trendy liberal anything goes society
    prevalent today, why are you suggesting that there is something
    distasteful in homosexuality?

    Equally, given your own Atheist approach to conventional religion, why
    would you care what sort of cleric populates the Roman Catholic
    clergy?

    Conversely, and very rarely, I actually agree with you, but then my
    views are well known and remain predictable, whereas yours appear to
    alter on a whim, depending on which side you wish to support from day
    to day.

    Today it is the Roman Catholic Church, tomorrow it will probably be me
    again, when I may suggest as you have above, that being a 'poofter'
    aint all it's made out to be!! ;o)

  13. On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:07:46 -0400, Will Brink
    <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    John Hanson said:

    On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:20:10 -0400, Will Brink
    <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    "The Dirty Vicar" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:[email hidden]...
    > > On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:33:00 -0600, Neil Gendzwill
    > > <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > >
    > >>Charles wrote:
    > >>> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:14:14 GMT, "David Cohen"
    > >>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>>>So, they elected Ratzinger, a German, as Pope. I guess this means my
    > >>>>annual
    > >>>>Easter apology wasn't accepted 🙁
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>> Well you surely weren't expecting the Israeli cardinal to be elected
    > >>> David - were you? ;o)
    > >>
    > >>Great, another ultra-traditionalist knob (Ratzinger, that is). In other
    > >>surprising news, the pope remains Catholic.
    > >
    > > The commentator on BBC Television actually said that Pope Benedict XVI
    > > is committed to the concept of Jesus Christ!!
    >
    > that is excellent! i understand he's for Charity too.

    And saying no to gay marriage when most of the catholic church is made
    up of gay men. Hypocritical BS, that¹s what it is.

    I had an ex-priest tell me that half of all priests are [censored] and the
    other half are alcoholics. He happened to be both.

    My sister got her masters in theology at a catholic college and told me
    about the gay culture within the sytem there and many other places
    (churches, etc) she dealt with. Many straight would be priests quit
    because they felt they were actually being excluded due to the gay
    culture there. As usual, the Catholic church needs to clean its own
    house before passing any judgment on how others live.

    I read a book while in high school about sex crimes. It gave actual
    accounts of crimes and the background on the criminals. One guy, who
    grew up in the Southwest, used to fool around with other boys in an
    area where that was quite common. After these boys went through
    puberty, they switched their attention to girls except for this guy.
    He realized as a teenager that he was a homosexual and felt that the
    best cure would be to join the seminary. Turns out that the main
    theme to seminary living was rampant homosexuality so he decided that
    probably wasn't going to work out for him, so he quit.

  14. Charles said:
    Quoted message said:

    My sister got her masters in theology at a catholic college and told me
    about the gay culture within the sytem there and many other places
    (churches, etc) she dealt with. Many straight would be priests quit
    because they felt they were actually being excluded due to the gay
    culture there. As usual, the Catholic church needs to clean its own
    house before passing any judgment on how others live.

    But if we are to believe the trendy liberal anything goes society
    prevalent today, why are you suggesting that there is something
    distasteful in homosexuality?

    There is a contradiction about this outward insistence on celibacy/abstinence,
    and an undercurrent in the opposite direction.

    Quoted message said:

    Equally, given your own Atheist approach to conventional religion, why
    would you care what sort of cleric populates the Roman Catholic
    clergy?

    In my case, I don't really give a damn. Their dilemma, not mine. The whole
    thing is little more than a tiresome circus to me.

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi
    http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

  15. Will Brink said:


    And saying no to gay marriage when most of the catholic church is made
    up of gay men. Hypocritical BS, that¹s what it is.

    but they don't want to marry each other either....

  16. Donovan Rebbechi said:
    Charles said:
    Quoted message said:

    My sister got her masters in theology at a catholic college and told me
    about the gay culture within the sytem there and many other places
    (churches, etc) she dealt with. Many straight would be priests quit
    because they felt they were actually being excluded due to the gay
    culture there. As usual, the Catholic church needs to clean its own
    house before passing any judgment on how others live.

    But if we are to believe the trendy liberal anything goes society
    prevalent today, why are you suggesting that there is something
    distasteful in homosexuality?

    There is a contradiction about this outward insistence on celibacy/abstinence,
    and an undercurrent in the opposite direction.

    Which I don't condone but it is essentially an internal matter for the
    Church.

    My point to Will is, whereas he is an advocate of all things
    homosexual, including the freedom to do to each other just what they
    damn well please, and given that he is an Atheist, why is he being so
    judgmental on priests?

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Equally, given your own Atheist approach to conventional religion, why
    would you care what sort of cleric populates the Roman Catholic
    clergy?

    In my case, I don't really give a damn. Their dilemma, not mine. The whole
    thing is little more than a tiresome circus to me.

    I agree entirely!

    ;o)

  17. ">

    Quoted message said:

    Because the Roman Catholic Church considers such lifestyles to be
    sinful, so it will assist such clerics in the observance of their
    faith!!

    + Well, only time until the Catholic Church ends up appologizing to the gay
    folk too. Then they can run more radio adds begging people to come back to
    the church.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Given the scandals concerning the priesthood and crimes against
    children, then it would appear that the profession has been a refuge
    for many perverted people that should be locked up.

    However, I do consider homosexuality a perversion, not only because of
    my Catholic upbringing, but because the whole scene revolts me.

    + Please explain what is revolting?

    Quoted message said:


    I am sympathetic to their dilemma, and recognise their right to
    achieve as much happiness as they are able, but I do wish they would
    do it in a much more modest and discreet manner.

    + LOL! Modest and discreet. What is not being done modest in discreet.
    Have a problem with someone holding their boyfriend or girlfriends hand?
    Have a problem with affection? Well, that's your problem now is it not?

    Quoted message said:


    I have been accused of many things here, but no-one has suggested that
    I am "confused"!! ;o)


    + They say there is a first for everything. I am saying you are confused.

    Quoted message said:


    Unfortunately, that is not so. Many high ranking churchmen, including
    the late Bishop of Durham categorically deny the Resurrection, and
    some are like myself, complete Agnostics, although I remain a
    'hopeful' if pragmatic Agnostic!!

    That has nothing to do with not believing in Christ or God. Once again, you
    are confused.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    It is very sad, and sometimes very depressing in its hopelessness.

    It would be of enormous advantage Woofer if you would include some
    header information, even if it were only with reference to whom you
    are responding!! ;o)


    + I'll work on it. The site has changed a bit since I last posted.

    Quoted message said:
  18. WooferBearATL said:


    ">

    Quoted message said:

    Because the Roman Catholic Church considers such lifestyles to be
    sinful, so it will assist such clerics in the observance of their
    faith!!

    + Well, only time until the Catholic Church ends up appologizing to the gay
    folk too. Then they can run more radio adds begging people to come back to
    the church.

    Ooops, don't tell me you take it up the bum Woofer!! ;o)

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    > Given the scandals concerning the priesthood and crimes against
    > children, then it would appear that the profession has been a refuge
    > for many perverted people that should be locked up.
    >

    However, I do consider homosexuality a perversion, not only because of
    my Catholic upbringing, but because the whole scene revolts me.

    + Please explain what is revolting?

    Certainly not you grubby person, I've already told you I find it
    revolting and don't really want to go into in detail. Read a book!!
    ;o)

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    I am sympathetic to their dilemma, and recognise their right to
    achieve as much happiness as they are able, but I do wish they would
    do it in a much more modest and discreet manner.

    + LOL! Modest and discreet. What is not being done modest in discreet.
    Have a problem with someone holding their boyfriend or girlfriends hand?

    Not as long as the "boyfriend" is holding his "girlfriends" hand and
    vice versa!! ;o)

    Quoted message said:

    Have a problem with affection? Well, that's your problem now is it not?

    No problem here, but then I'm a committed heterosexual and get my
    "affection" in rather more traditional ways!!

    We don't all subscribe to the modern PC way!!

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    I have been accused of many things here, but no-one has suggested that
    I am "confused"!! ;o)


    + They say there is a first for everything. I am saying you are confused.

    You can say all you like dear boy, it won't make it true!!

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    Unfortunately, that is not so. Many high ranking churchmen, including
    the late Bishop of Durham categorically deny the Resurrection, and
    some are like myself, complete Agnostics, although I remain a
    'hopeful' if pragmatic Agnostic!!

    That has nothing to do with not believing in Christ or God.

    It is you who is confused Sir; the resurrection of Jesus Christ is the
    very basics of Christianity!!

    Quoted message said:

    Once again, you are confused.

    Then argue with this:

    ag·nos·tic Audio pronunciation of "agnostic" ( P ) Pronunciation
    Key (g-nstk)
    n.

    1.
    1. One who believes that it is impossible to know whether
    there is a God.
    2. One who is skeptical about the existence of God but does
    not profess true atheism.

    The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth
    Edition

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    It is very sad, and sometimes very depressing in its hopelessness.

    It would be of enormous advantage Woofer if you would include some
    header information, even if it were only with reference to whom you
    are responding!! ;o)


    + I'll work on it. The site has changed a bit since I last posted.

    Thank you!! ;o)

  19. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Paul Cassel said:
    Will Brink said:


    And saying no to gay marriage when most of the catholic church is made
    up of gay men. Hypocritical BS, that¹s what it is.

    but they don't want to marry each other either....

    And how do you know that?

    --
    Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/

  20. ">

    Quoted message said:

    Ooops, don't tell me you take it up the bum Woofer!! ;o)


    + Not often. I'm mostly a top.

    Quoted message said:


    Certainly not you grubby person, I've already told you I find it
    revolting and don't really want to go into in detail. Read a book!!
    ;o)


    + I'm just starting to read Running with Scizors. Maybe when I'm done with
    that one.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Not as long as the "boyfriend" is holding his "girlfriends" hand and
    vice versa!! ;o)

    + Well this boyfriend holds his boyfriends hand where ever he wants to.

    Quoted message said:

    No problem here, but then I'm a committed heterosexual and get my
    "affection" in rather more traditional ways!!

    + I don't do anything in public that I don't see plenty of str8 folk do.

    Quoted message said:

    It is you who is confused Sir; the resurrection of Jesus Christ is the
    very basics of Christianity!!

    + Silly me. I thought it was the teachings of Christ. I can't understand
    why the New Testament is so long if the only important part is the
    Crusifixion and the Reserection.

    Quoted message said:

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.