Geoghegan: "Flandis made me do it."

On May 18, 11:10 am, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

I can see the phone records being examined to trace the location of
the call and also the location of flandis' cell phone at the same
time.

Well, so Landis later admits he was present when the call was made.
What a $%^&*.

On May 18, 12:10 pm, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Is this next? Will Geoghegan face charges of tampering with a
witness?

I can see the phone records being examined to trace the location of
the call and also the location of flandis' cell phone at the same
time.

....point being? Do you often say, "Who are you talking to? Huh? Who
are you talking to?", everytime someone whips out a cell phone?

Quoted message said:

Once fired, people will say anything against their ex employers for a
buck.

He wasn't fired, he self-immolated. Far different.

Quoted message said:

Ah, the world keeps turning.

That is true. The WG-Lemond interaction is nothing more than a
distraction and should be treated as such.

R

RicodJour said:

On May 18, 12:10 pm, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Is this next? Will Geoghegan face charges of tampering with a
witness?

Quoted message said:

I can see the phone records being examined to trace the location of
the call and also the location of flandis' cell phone at the same
time.

...point being? Do you often say, "Who are you talking to? Huh? Who
are you talking to?", everytime someone whips out a cell phone?

Quoted message said:

Once fired, people will say anything against their ex employers for a
buck.

He wasn't fired, he self-immolated. Far different.

Different? Are you saying all the press got the "your fired" quote
wrong from the Flandis lawyer?

What the reports are saying, the manager would have learned of Lemonds
past by getting the info from Flandis. Who else knew? Anyone in
RBR? I'd say they discussed it prior to the call and Flandis was
fully aware.

Obviously the lawyer didn't know.

"RicodJour" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On May 18, 12:10 pm, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Is this next? Will Geoghegan face charges of tampering with a
witness?

I can see the phone records being examined to trace the location of
the call and also the location of flandis' cell phone at the same
time.

...point being? Do you often say, "Who are you talking to? Huh? Who
are you talking to?", everytime someone whips out a cell phone?

Quoted message said:

Once fired, people will say anything against their ex employers for a
buck.

He wasn't fired, he self-immolated. Far different.

Quoted message said:

Ah, the world keeps turning.

That is true. The WG-Lemond interaction is nothing more than a
distraction and should be treated as such.

Strangely, when I read "WG", I associated it with Warren Gibson and thought
to myself, "What the hell is his involvement in all of this?"