FSA chainrings

Billy Andrews said:

Hi, I need to replace the chainrings on my Dura-Ace 7700 cranks (9-speed, if
that matters), and I'm wondering, how well do the FSAs shift? I see they
have pins and ramps; do they work as well as the Dura-Ace rings, or should I
spend the $$ on the OEM gear?

shimano rings work the best, followed by TA rings, IMO..FSA rings are
some of the softest I have encountered.

Qui si parla Campagnolo-www.vecchios.com said:

Billy Andrews said:

Hi, I need to replace the chainrings on my Dura-Ace 7700 cranks (9-speed, if
that matters), and I'm wondering, how well do the FSAs shift? I see they
have pins and ramps; do they work as well as the Dura-Ace rings, or should I
spend the $$ on the OEM gear?

shimano rings work the best, followed by TA rings, IMO..FSA rings are
some of the softest I have encountered.

they work just fine- no problems here.

Quoted message said:

Hi, I need to replace the chainrings on my Dura-Ace 7700 cranks (9-speed,
if that matters), and I'm wondering, how well do the FSAs shift? I see
they have pins and ramps; do they work as well as the Dura-Ace rings, or
should I spend the $$ on the OEM gear?

Unfortunately, you will find no better-shifting chainring than Shimano. Ever
since the "STX" debacle (truly horrible mountain bike crankset that
redefined chain-suck), Shimano's been devoting a lot of effort to perfecting
chainring technology. The result is better shifting, with the downside being
noisier drivetrains and (usually) faster wear.

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

shimano rings work the best, followed by TA rings, IMO..FSA rings are
some of the softest I have encountered.

they work just fine- no problems here.

I'm happy with mine. I've put over 50,000 km on them without any
problems.