Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Frame Sizes

Started by \\¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/ · · Last activity · 4 posts · 926 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
6 May 2004
Last activity
7 May 2004
Original author
\\¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
926
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi

    As a bit of a newb, looking to buy a bike, I was wondering if someone could
    offer me some info...

    Going by traditional sizing methods to check which size of bike I'd need; having
    a long inner leg measurement I find that a 21" or 22" would be about the correct
    size.

    Looking at the multitude of bikes/frames/kits available, there are plenty of
    Front susp bikes with this frame size. However, the Dual susp bikes only seem to
    go up to 19" frame sizes (there are one or two 20" models I have found, but not
    many).

    My question is: Are dual susp bikes measured differently? ie are they
    deliberately shorter for off-road purposes, or am I just looking in the wrong
    places?

    I want a bike to use for mild/moderate off-road use, as well as cross country
    trailing - so am I probably better off sticking with a hard tail frameset?

    Thanks in advance.

    biz

  2. \\¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/ said:

    My question is: Are dual susp bikes measured differently? ie are they
    deliberately shorter for off-road purposes, or am I just looking in the wrong
    places?

    There are very few "standards" in the bike business, and "bike sizing"
    is one clear example.

    The "size" measurements all start from the center of the bottom
    bracket (or crank bolt, if you prefer), and run along the centerline
    of the seat tube to:

    a) center of the top tube (the most useful if you're cutting tubes to
    build frames, but kinda meaningless to the rider since he/she doesn't
    really care where the center of the tube is)

    b) top of the top tube (this one is IMHO the best since it tells you
    where the part of the tube you need to worry about is located)

    c) top of the seat tube (this one makes no sense at all, IMHO).

    I suspect the thing that's confusing you is that the FS bikes tend to
    be "smaller" from a frame measurement perspective because the bottom
    bracket is higher (otherwise you'd be dragging your cranks through the
    mud when the suspension compresses). That means that a given size
    rider will ride a "smaller" FS bike than he/she would a hard tail.

    Mark Hickey
    Habanero Cycles
    http://www.habcycles.com
    Home of the $695 ti frame

  3. \\¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/ said:

    Going by traditional sizing methods to check which size of bike I'd need;
    having a long inner leg measurement I find that a 21" or 22" would be
    about the correct size.

    Not sure what you mean by traditional. If you mean using some goofy
    math against your inseam to pop out a frame size, well, don't do that.

    The first measurement you should look at to compare frames is effective
    top tube length. If a bike is close to the right length for you, swapping
    stems and moving the saddle around on the seatpost clamp can help you
    make the fit perfect. If the bike is the wrong length by more than .75"
    or so, there's only so much you can do. Seat tube height is really a bad
    measurement to use to compare bikes (tradition be damned) since you can
    "fix" the vertical fit just by changing seat height, and lengths vary
    by mfger.

    Full suspension bikes don't necessarily have a complete "seat tube", so
    often the sizing is going to S, M, L, XL. And that makes a TON more sense
    than talking about a 19" bike (when one mfger's 19 has a 24.25" effective
    top tube and another mfger's 19 has a 23.5" ett).

    Since you admit that you are something of a newb, here's the best advice
    for you. FIND A GOOD BIKE SHOP. Not just a pretty shop that has the brands
    you like, but a shop that has people who KNOW bike fitting. Especially
    if your body proportions are atypical, you need the help of someone who
    knows how to fit people to bikes. In person. And then you need to test
    ride many bikes.
    --
    Tom Purvis - http://www.arkansasvalley.net/tpurvis/
    "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
    certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts."-Bertrand Russell

  4. "Mark Hickey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    Mark Hickey
    Habanero Cycles
    http://www.habcycles.com
    Home of the $695 ti frame

    "Tom Purvis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    --
    Tom Purvis - http://www.arkansasvalley.net/tpurvis/
    "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
    certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts."-Bertrand Russell

    Thanks guys, advice taken on board.
    cheers
    biz

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.