General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

For the Oly lifters

Started by John Hanson · · Last activity · 4 posts · 321 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
28 July 2005
Last activity
31 July 2005
Original author
John Hanson
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
321
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have my opinion. What's yours?
    http://goheavy.com/forums/debate/index.cgi/noframes/read/81760

  2. Quoted message said:

    For the Oly lifters>

    What is this NG's fascination with oily lifters? Why oil up to begin
    with?

  3. Wow, what Simmons advocates is the exact opposite of Joe Mills'
    philosophy. Mills' method worked, too. He made Bednarski World Champion
    in '69, after all. Mills advocated training using more or less nothing
    but the two full lifts. Simmons doesn't seem to comprehend that Mills'
    answer to any perceived "inbalances" in strength would have been that
    this only resulted from improper technique in the lifts to begin with
    and that the answer to this was simply technique correction by careful
    coaching while drilling in the full lifts. Mills placed next to no value
    in assistance excercises.
    I'll tell you this, I've met people who were trained by Mills and
    knew him intimately, and while I obviously can't speak to what went on
    in the past, they had a pretty low view of drug-use. Whatever the
    situation was with Bednarski and drugs, I can at the very least
    guarantee you it was nowhere near as advanced as what the Soviets were
    doing in this area, and I can hardly believe anyone could seriously
    dispute this or claim it was not a primary factor in things at the time.
    Unless Simmons is seriously going to make a claim that the old
    gent from Central Falls was incorporating the science of pharmacology
    into his coaching at the same intrinisic level it was going on behind
    the Iron Curtain, then any comparisons are worhtless, and he shouldn't
    be knocking Mills. In fact, if anything, in light of where the Soviets
    were with this stuff, I think it only makes all the more impressive the
    achievements of the people, like Bednarski, that Mills trained. Bottom
    line is that Mills' methods actually produced a real World Champion,
    whereas Simmons is armchair quarterbacking.
    To be honest -and leaving the drugs aside- I pretty much lost all
    repsect for Simmons when I read his advice that a person attempting a
    700 lbs. bench should be wearing a shirt so tight that they cannot lower
    a 600 lbs. bar down to their chest. That's not lifting. That's, well...I
    don't know...but it ain't lifting as I understand it -as a display of
    personal strength. I mean, if you're wearing a shirt that won't even let
    you get a 600 lb. bar down to your chest, how much strength is there
    going into pressing a 100lbs. more?

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] (Four Corners)

    Quoted message said:

    Wow, what Simmons advocates is the exact opposite of Joe Mills'
    philosophy. Mills' method worked, too. He made Bednarski World Champion
    in '69, after all. Mills advocated training using more or less nothing
    but the two full lifts.

    In '69 there were three lifts.

    Also...

    http://danjohn.org/bobbed.html

    --
    Keith

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.