montygram said:Quoted message said:Why do you need a web site? Maybe to keep score?
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:18 citations from the educational domain. Mostly from high schools, but
it also includes: Purdue University, Harvard University, the Nutrition
Dept of the University of Arizona, and University of Texas.
naturalhealthperspective site:.edu
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Over 1,500 citations from Organizations on the web.
naturalhealthperspective site:.org
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Over 1,200 citations from businesses on the web.
naturalhealthperspective site:.com
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:And of course, 6,250 hits for naturalhealthperspective in Google
groups. But, only 2,130 hits for montygram.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:You have my condolences, Monty. I did not list my other markers. Ha, ... Hah, Ha!
Whatever the score might be, you sir are surely a zero.
Speaking of zeroes, you are NOT the only zero on these ngs. 🙂
I, also checked out http://www.morelife.org , the web site started 2
years before mine by the biggest former zero on smn, Paul Wakfer (aka,
Tom Matthews). I made Tom move. 🙂
My non-science website got Paul's so-called science web site beat on
all counts, even though he had a 2 year head start. 🙂
morelife.org site:.edu = 6 vs 18.
morelife.org site:.uk = 29 vs 57.
morelife.org site:.com = 622 vs 1,200+
morelife.org site:.org = 882 vs 1,500+
Just think of all of Tom Matthews' science [censored] that I had to put
up with longer than you have been posting here. When all is said and
done, Tom was and is full of [censored] and more academics (ie, Tom's turf)
are citing my non-scientific web site than his science [censored].
The facts are the facts. When the public does not respond with what you
have to offer, you losers should always respond gracefully without
resorting to your famous adhominen attacks so characteristic of the
classic negative attitude of a scientist in action. You are just plain
negative and nasty. You have the personality of a constipated warthog.
And, the public has spoken, on this subject quite nicely. 🙂
Just thought that you losers, might want to know just how big a loser
you really are.
Ha, ... Hah, Ha!
Of course, my health and wellness web site was 'certified' and
recertified twice. If Tom's site is so scientific why ain't it
certified? Could it be that www.morelife.org is more of a Quack web
site, than mine is?
See: The mission of our site has been a success.
at: http://naturalhealthperspective.com/contact/aboutus.html
for user comments, and the best academic citations to my web site. 🙂
--
John Gohde,
Patient Empowerment Advocate
Email: [email hidden]
http://NaturalHealthPerspective.com Pioneering de-medicalization by
handing back the power to the people, encouraging self care and
autonomy, and resisting the categorization of life's problems as
medical.
