Floyd Landis is Not Guilty

"wimpyVO2" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

After reading about the testimony of Dr. John Amory and Dr. Wolfram
Meier-Augenstein, there is no question that Landis is not guilty. I
don't know if Floyd is innocent, but that's not the same as Not
Guilty. The lab results are junk and aren't good enough to justify
taking away Landis' title.

The best thing USADA could do for cycling is to rule the lab results
as inconclusive. This would put pressure on WADA to tighten up lab
standards. You can't clean up doping without good labs.

You can't clean up doping with an organization dedicated to proving anyone
accused guilty.

Quoted message said:

You can't clean up doping with an organization dedicated to proving anyone accused guilty.

Well said
Cycler

Tom Kunich said:

"wimpyVO2" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

After reading about the testimony of Dr. John Amory and Dr. Wolfram
Meier-Augenstein, there is no question that Landis is not guilty. I
don't know if Floyd is innocent, but that's not the same as Not
Guilty. The lab results are junk and aren't good enough to justify
taking away Landis' title.

The best thing USADA could do for cycling is to rule the lab results
as inconclusive. This would put pressure on WADA to tighten up lab
standards. You can't clean up doping without good labs.

You can't clean up doping with an organization dedicated to proving anyone
accused guilty.

I'm beginning to think LNDD stands for "Let's Not Disappoint [censored]".

It's been Pound's personal go-to lab when he wants someone to test
positive on his own whim.

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

You can't clean up doping with an organization dedicated to proving anyone
accused guilty.

Yup, even if they're innocent.