Should community centers prioritize bike storage and repair facilities over other amenities, such as childcare services or meeting spaces, considering the growing demand for cycling infrastructure and the potential for increased membership and revenue? Some argue that catering to cyclists would attract a more affluent demographic, while others claim it would unfairly displace existing programs and services. Can community centers effectively balance the needs of diverse user groups, or would bike-centric amenities create an unequal distribution of resources? Would this shift in focus be a savvy business move or an exclusionary policy, and what are the potential consequences for the broader community?