Can we honestly say that exploring the flatlands on Zwift provides a rich enough experience for serious cyclists, or is it just a lazy way to avoid the tougher climbs and more technically demanding routes available elsewhere on the platform?
Some of the flat routes on Zwift can be up to 40 miles long with barely any incline; what is the point of riding such a route if youre not going to challenge yourself? Are the benefits of a low-intensity, high-volume training session really worth the monotony of endless flat riding? Or are riders just using the flatlands as an excuse to go easy on themselves?
Is the lack of engagement with flat routes a failure of Zwifts design or a reflection of the riders own lack of creativity in their training? Is there even a place for flat routes in a serious training program, or are they just a waste of time for anyone looking to genuinely improve their cycling skills?
Some of the flat routes on Zwift can be up to 40 miles long with barely any incline; what is the point of riding such a route if youre not going to challenge yourself? Are the benefits of a low-intensity, high-volume training session really worth the monotony of endless flat riding? Or are riders just using the flatlands as an excuse to go easy on themselves?
Is the lack of engagement with flat routes a failure of Zwifts design or a reflection of the riders own lack of creativity in their training? Is there even a place for flat routes in a serious training program, or are they just a waste of time for anyone looking to genuinely improve their cycling skills?