General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Example of group selection?

Started by Michael Ragland · · Last activity · 2 posts · 1,063 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
5 July 2004
Last activity
5 July 2004
Original author
Michael Ragland
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,063
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Published online before print January 21, 2003, 10.1073/pnas.0234412100
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 February 4; 100 (3): 10781083
    DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0234412100

    Evolution Genetic diversity, asymmetrical aggression, and
    recognition in a widespread invasive species

    Neil D. Tsutsui,* Andrew V. Suarez, and Richard K. Grosberg*
    *Center for Population Biology, Division of Biological
    Sciences, University of California, One Shields Avenue,
    Davis, CA 95616; and Department of Environmental Science,
    Policy and Management, Division of Insect Biology,
    University of California, 201 Wellman Hall, No. 3112,
    Berkeley, CA 94720-3112 Edited by May R. Berenbaum,
    University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, and approved December 4,
    2002, (received for review July 24, 2002) To whom
    correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
    [email hidden].

    Abstract  The evolution and persistence of cooperative
    social units depends on the ability to distinguish group
    members from nonmembers. The precision of discrimination, in
    turn, relies on variation in the labels that individuals use
    to recognize group members. However, this same variation can
    be selected against if individuals that are rejected as
    nonmembers incur a high cost. Here we provide evidence that
    selection against individuals from genetically diverse
    groups has contributed to the formation of the unicolonial
    colony structure that characterizes introduced populations
    of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Studies
    in both the laboratory and the field showed that individuals
    from less genetically diverse colonies attack individuals
    from more diverse colonies and that attackers survived
    agonistic encounters more than six times as often as
    recipients of aggression. This selection, in concert with
    reductions in genetic diversity after a founder event,
    likely creates a barrier to the establishment of new,
    genetically diverse introductions from the native range and
    may reduce genetic diversity within established populations
    in the introduced range.

    Copyright © 2003, The National Academy of Sciences

    "It's uncertain whether intelligence has any long term
    survival value." Stephen Hawking

  2. Michael Ragland said:

    Published online before print January 21, 2003,
    10.1073/pnas.0234412100 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003
    February 4; 100 (3): 10781083 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0234412100

    Evolution Genetic diversity, asymmetrical aggression, and
    recognition in a widespread invasive species

    Neil D. Tsutsui,* Andrew V. Suarez, and Richard
    K. Grosberg* *Center for Population Biology, Division of
    Biological Sciences, University of California, One Shields
    Avenue, Davis, CA 95616; and Department of Environmental
    Science, Policy and Management, Division of Insect
    Biology, University of California, 201 Wellman Hall, No.
    3112, Berkeley, CA 94720-3112 Edited by May R. Berenbaum,
    University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, and approved December
    4, 2002, (received for review July 24, 2002) To whom
    correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
    [email hidden].

    Abstract  The evolution and persistence of cooperative
    social units depends on the ability to distinguish group
    members from nonmembers. The precision of discrimination,
    in turn, relies on variation in the labels that
    individuals use to recognize group members. However, this
    same variation can be selected against if individuals
    that are rejected as nonmembers incur a high cost. Here
    we provide evidence that selection against individuals
    from genetically diverse groups has contributed to the
    formation of the unicolonial colony structure that
    characterizes introduced populations of the invasive
    Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Studies in both the
    laboratory and the field showed that individuals from
    less genetically diverse colonies attack individuals from
    more diverse colonies and that attackers survived
    agonistic encounters more than six times as often as
    recipients of aggression. This selection, in concert with
    reductions in genetic diversity after a founder event,
    likely creates a barrier to the establishment of new,
    genetically diverse introductions from the native range
    and may reduce genetic diversity within established
    populations in the introduced range.


    I went to a seminar by a Danish guy (not one of these
    authors) a few years ago, and was amused by the way that he
    spent an hour talking about this system, which, yes, is
    basically group selection, but never mentioned the term.

    The good news (for those living with these species) is that
    the data from the Argentinian populations suggest that
    eventually a "cheater" phenotype will evolve, which will be
    recognised as a member of the group, but will not help the
    super-colony. This will reduce the fitness of the colony,
    which should reduce it's invasiveness. All in all, lots more
    fun and games for those working on the species.

    Bob

    --
    Bob O'Hara

    Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics
    P.O. Box 4 (Yliopistonkatu 5) FIN-00014 University of
    Helsinki Finland Telephone: +358-9-191 23743 Mobile:
    +358 50 599 0540 Fax: +358-9-191 22 779 WWW:
    rni.helsinki.fi~boh Journal of Negative
    Results - EEB: jnr-eeb.orgjnr-eeb.org

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.