UK and Europe · Public discussion

Etape

Started by Rogerc · · Last activity · 4 posts · 575 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
30 May 2004
Last activity
30 May 2004
Original author
Rogerc
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
575
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Bought a new custom fitted bike in London, specifically
    designed to assist an old man do the Etape with his son.

    Campag Centaur equipment.

    After considerable discussion on lowest gear that I might
    need I thought we had settled on front triple 52/39/32 and
    rear of 13 -29. Lowest ratio x
    1.10 -- top of x 4.00

    In practice they have fitted 50/40/30 ( which I did not
    notice until I was home) -- giving a low of x 1.03 and a
    high of x 3.84. I may well need the very lowest gearing --
    but now the whole bike is geared a good bit lower.

    Question was the discussion on 52 / 39 / 32 pointless as the
    triple can never be set up that way -- and might / should
    they have gone 52 / 42 / 30 which seems a more normal front
    triple set up -- because if they had told me that I might
    have asked for a 12 / 26 cassette -- giving a low of x 1.15
    and a high of x 4.33. Rog

  2. RogerC <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : In practice they have fitted 50/40/30 ( which I did not
    : notice until I was home) -- giving a low of x 1.03 and a
    : high of x 3.84. I may well need the very lowest gearing --
    : but now the whole bike is geared a good bit lower.

    Personally I really like 30/40/50. You'll not really need a
    gear bigger than 50x13 anyway on a ride that long unless you
    are *very* fit.

    : Question was the discussion on 52 / 39 / 32 pointless as
    : the triple can never be set up that way -- and might /
    : should they have gone 52 / 42 / 30 which seems a more
    : normal front triple set up

    Depends. You can spend more time in the middle ring
    with a 40 and it's a smaller drop to the little ring,
    which is nice.

    In practice, since it's there, I'd not worry.

    Arthur

    --
    Arthur Clune clune.orgclune.org "Technolibertarians make a
    philosophy out of a personality defect"
    - Paulina Borsook

  3. "Arthur Clune" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    : Question was the discussion on 52 / 39 / 32 pointless as
    : the triple can never be set up that way -- and might /
    : should they have gone 52 / 42 /


    30

    Quoted message said:

    : which seems a more normal front triple set up

    Depends. You can spend more time in the middle ring with a
    40 and it's a


    smaller

    Quoted message said:

    drop to the little ring, which is nice.

    In practice, since it's there, I'd not worry.

    Arthur

    Thx Arthur for your assurance -- but when you are on
    50/40/30 do you have a
    12/26 on the back or this very low 13/29

    Mind you -- old man -- etape -- may be I shall be very
    grateful for the 30 /29 -- just seems weird at the moment --
    mind you I do live in East Anglia so perhaps that has
    something to do with it Roger C

  4. RogerC <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : Thx Arthur for your assurance -- but when you are on
    : 50/40/30 do you have a
    : 12/26 on the back or this very low 13/29

    Me? I use 34/48 instead of a triple with either 12/23
    (normally) or 13/26 (for the alps/lakes etc). But I'm skinny
    and climb well.

    But note the top gear 48x12 = 52x13 which isn't that much
    bigger than 50x13. And I TT, road race and do very fast
    group rides on that.

    : Mind you -- old man -- etape -- may be I shall be very
    : grateful for the 30 /29 -- just seems weird at the moment
    : -- mind you I do live in East Anglia so perhaps that has
    : something to do with it

    It never hurts to have a low gear you don't use. And if it
    means you can keep riding after 120 miles in 30+C heat and
    hills then it's really worth while.

    For most people, more low gears and better spacing at
    the front is more sensible than a having a few big gears
    at the top.

    Arthur

    --
    Arthur Clune clune.orgclune.org "Technolibertarians make a
    philosophy out of a personality defect"
    - Paulina Borsook

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.