Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Equal Access to Our Parks

Started by Mike Vandeman · · Last activity · 1 post · 423 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
23 March 2004
Last activity
23 March 2004
Original author
Mike Vandeman
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
423
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. November 24, 1999 Tony Acosta Director, Office of Parks,
    Recreation, and Cultural Affairs 1520 Lakeside Drive
    Oakland, CA 94612

    Re: Access to Joaquin Miller Park

    Dear Sir:

    I am very concerned about the arbitrary and
    discriminatory management of Oakland's parks. I like
    to practice bulldozer racing (also known as
    "bulldozer scrambling", or BS, for short). That is
    my way of enjoying nature. Who are you to tell me
    how I should enjoy nature?! Why
    __________________________________________________
    is your way of enjoying the outdoors any better than mine?!
    ____ ____ You allow roller-bladers, equestrians, mountain
    bikers, and even hikers in your parks. But I am excluded,
    and can't enjoy
    ________
    the parks that I pay taxes for. You obviously like them
    better than me, or maybe you belong to one of those user
    groups, so you are biased towards them. In any case, you are
    discriminating against me and other bulldozer racers, and I
    demand that this discrimination, which violates the Fifth
    Amendment to the Constitution, stop immediately!

    I know that bulldozer racers have a bad name, but
    that's just because we are the new kid on the block.
    We are a tiny minority. I know that there have been
    some problems, such as some people riding
    recklessly, going off the designated trails, and
    even secretly constructing illegal trails. But those
    are a small minority of bulldozer riders. You
    shouldn't allow a small minority to give the
    majority of us bulldozer racers, who ride
    responsibly, a bad name. Why should we be punished,
    just because of them, and be forced to walk, just
    ________ ____ like everybody else?

    I also know that some extremist tree-huggers claim
    that it's a violation of CEQA (the California
    Environmental Quality Act) to allow a new use of the
    park trails, and the creation of new trails, without
    doing an EIR (Environmental Impact Report). But you
    are right: mountain biking and bulldozer racing,
    when performed in an environmentally responsible
    ________________________________________________
    manner, doesn't have a significant impact on the
    environment.
    ______
    In fact, it's actually beneficial to wildlife. You can tell
    __________
    that, by the fact that you often see deer tracks on the
    mountain biking trails. If the trails didn't benefit them,
    they wouldn't use them, now would they? Bulldozer racing
    doesn't drive out wildlife. That is a myth. I see lots of
    ____
    wildlife where I ride.

    Some people say that we ride too fast to avoid
    killing small animals on the trail, such as snakes
    -- that we have to pay attention to avoid crashing,
    and can't also look out for wildlife. Are they that
    slow? What about "survival of the fittest"? If they
    are that slow, they aren't going to survive, anyway.

    Some HOHAs ("Hateful Old Hikers", as the mountain
    bikers call them) claim that bulldozer racing does
    more harm to the environment than hiking. But a
    scientific study was done in
    ________________
    New Zealand, proving that bulldozer racing does no more harm
    _______
    than hiking. Another scientific study showed that most
    erosion
    ________________
    is caused by nature, and so any additional erosion caused
    by bulldozer racing is not significant, by comparison.
    Would you rather have the park clear-cut, or turned into
    another gated community for the rich? Without the support
    of strong environmentalists like us, that's what will
    inevitably happen! We are your strongest defense against
    development. If a park doesn't have a strong constituency
    of recreational users, no
    ____________
    one will care about it, and it will inevitably be lost.
    ____
    (That's what those environmental extremists call "destroying
    it, in order to save it". But what do they know?) The HOHAs
    ____
    claim that vehicles make it too easy for lazy, uncaring
    people to get into wildlife habitat. But if nobody goes
    there, who will protect the park? The more people go to
    a park, the
    _________________________________
    better it is for the wildlife!
    ______________________________

    Another claim is that we compact the soil around
    redwoods, killing them! Can you believe that?! In
    Muir Woods National Monument, they don't even let
    people walk next to them, making
    ____
    them stick to pavement or raised walkways. They must be run
    by an environmental extremist tree-hugger!

    I know that some HOHAs claim that bulldozer racing
    is annoying, and destroys their experience of
    nature. I guess they're superior to everybody else.
    They are just being selfish. They just don't want to
    share "their" trails with anybody else! That's
    obvious. The older ones claim that they have given
    up going there, because they are afraid of being
    hit, or are tired of constantly having to get off
    the trail to let bulldozers go by. Isn't that just
    evolution -- survival of the fittest? Why should
    hikers, or anyone else, have the whole park to
    themselves? We pay taxes, too. We have just as much
    right to be there as they do. We are just as much
    environmentalists as they are. We love nature!
    That's why we
    ____
    want to ride there!

    When you have spent as much on your equipment as we
    have, believe me, it is very frustrating, not to
    have any place to use it! We don't, of course,
    condone illegal trail building. However, we can
    understand the frustration of people whose only sin
    is preferring a different way of enjoying nature.
    They think that, because they are able to purchase a
    piece of equipment that lets them go off-road, the
    public is obligated to give them a place to use it.
    That's understandable -- isn't that the American
    way? Aren't they just like the pioneers?

    We bulldozer racers ("BS-ers"😉 belong in the parks
    just as much as everybody else. If the HOHAs don't
    want us on their trails, because we allegedly create
    narrow ruts, and make them difficult to walk on,
    then we deserve to have our own trails,
    ___
    which we will gladly build for free. There is plenty of
    space for everyone. If the wildlife don't like it, they
    can always move! It's just survival of the fittest. As I
    said, that's
    ____
    what evolution is all about.

    We will even police our own riders, so that you
    won't have any additional expenses. After all, how
    would you catch a renegade
    _____
    bulldozer racer? Your rangers would also need to drive
    bulldozers, increasing the wear and tear on the trails. We
    can do that for you. How about it? There are more and more
    of us every day. And we vote.
    ____

    Sin-
    cer-
    ely,

    Mic-
    hael
    J.
    Van-
    dem-
    an,
    Ph.-
    D.

    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits
    to humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the
    previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road
    construction.)

    home.pacbell.netmjvande

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.