Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Equal Access to Our Parks

Started by Mike Vandeman · · Last activity · 4 posts · 238 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
8 August 2006
Last activity
8 August 2006
Original author
Mike Vandeman
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
238
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. November 24,
    1999
    Tony Acosta
    Director, Office of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Affairs
    1520 Lakeside Drive
    Oakland, CA 94612

    Re: Access to Joaquin Miller Park

    Dear Sir:

    I am very concerned about the arbitrary and discriminatory
    management of Oakland's parks. I like to practice bulldozer racing
    (also known as "bulldozer scrambling", or BS, for short). That is my
    way of enjoying nature. Who are you to tell me how I should enjoy
    nature?! Why is your way of enjoying the outdoors any better than
    mine?! You allow roller-bladers, equestrians, mountain bikers, and
    even hikers in your parks. But I am excluded, and can't enjoy the
    parks that I pay taxes for. You obviously like them better than me, or
    maybe you belong to one of those user groups, so you are biased
    towards them. In any case, you are discriminating against me and other
    bulldozer racers, and I demand that this discrimination, which
    violates the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, stop immediately!

    I know that bulldozer racers have a bad name, but that's just
    because we are the new kid on the block. We are a tiny minority. I
    know that there have been some problems, such as some people riding
    recklessly, going off the designated trails, and even secretly
    constructing illegal trails. But those are a small minority of
    bulldozer riders. You shouldn't allow a small minority to give the
    majority of us bulldozer racers, who ride responsibly, a bad name. Why
    should we be punished, just because of them, and be forced to walk,
    just like everybody else?

    I also know that some extremist tree-huggers claim that it's a
    violation of CEQA (the California Environmental Quality Act) to allow
    a new use of the park trails, and the creation of new trails, without
    doing an EIR (Environmental Impact Report). But you are right:
    mountain biking and bulldozer racing, when performed in an
    environmentally responsible manner, doesn't have a significant impact
    on the environment. In fact, it's actually beneficial to wildlife. You
    can tell that, by the fact that you often see deer tracks on the
    mountain biking trails. If the trails didn't benefit them, they
    wouldn't use them, now would they? Bulldozer racing doesn't drive out
    wildlife. That is a myth. I see lots of wildlife where I ride.

    Some people say that we ride too fast to avoid killing small
    animals on the trail, such as snakes -- that we have to pay attention
    to avoid crashing, and can't also look out for wildlife. Are they that
    slow? What about "survival of the fittest"? If they are that slow,
    they aren't going to survive, anyway.

    Some HOHAs ("Hateful Old Hikers", as the mountain bikers call
    them) claim that bulldozer racing does more harm to the environment
    than hiking. But a scientific study was done in New Zealand, proving
    that bulldozer racing does no more harm than hiking. Another
    scientific study showed that most erosion is caused by nature, and so
    any additional erosion caused by bulldozer racing is not significant,
    by comparison. Would you rather have the park clear-cut, or turned
    into another gated community for the rich? Without the support of
    strong environmentalists like us, that's what will inevitably happen!
    We are your strongest defense against development. If a park doesn't
    have a strong constituency of recreational users, no one will care
    about it, and it will inevitably be lost. (That's what those
    environmental extremists call "destroying it, in order to save it".
    But what do they know?) The HOHAs claim that vehicles make it too easy
    for lazy, uncaring people to get into wildlife habitat. But if nobody
    goes there, who will protect the park? The more people go to a park,
    the better it is for the wildlife!

    Another claim is that we compact the soil around redwoods, killing
    them! Can you believe that?! In Muir Woods National Monument, they
    don't even let people walk next to them, making them stick to pavement
    or raised walkways. They must be run by an environmental extremist
    tree-hugger!

    I know that some HOHAs claim that bulldozer racing is
    annoying, and destroys their experience of nature. I guess they're
    superior to everybody else. They are just being selfish. They just
    don't want to share "their" trails with anybody else! That's obvious.
    The older ones claim that they have given up going there, because they
    are afraid of being hit, or are tired of constantly having to get off
    the trail to let bulldozers go by. Isn't that just evolution --
    survival of the fittest? Why should hikers, or anyone else, have the
    whole park to themselves? We pay taxes, too. We have just as much
    right to be there as they do. We are just as much environmentalists as
    they are. We love nature! That's why we want to ride there!

    When you have spent as much on your equipment as we have, believe me,
    it is very frustrating, not to have any place to use it! We don't, of
    course, condone illegal trail building. However, we can understand the
    frustration of people whose only sin is preferring a different way of
    enjoying nature. They think that, because they are able to purchase a
    piece of equipment that lets them go off-road, the public is obligated
    to give them a place to use it. That's understandable -- isn't that
    the American way? Aren't they just like the pioneers?

    We bulldozer racers ("BS-ers"😉 belong in the parks just as much as
    everybody else. If the HOHAs don't want us on their trails, because we
    allegedly create narrow ruts, and make them difficult to walk on, then
    we deserve to have our own trails, which we will gladly build for
    free. There is plenty of space for everyone. If the wildlife don't
    like it, they can always move! It's just survival of the fittest. As I
    said, that's what evolution is all about.

    We will even police our own riders, so that you won't have any
    additional expenses. After all, how would you catch a renegade
    bulldozer racer? Your rangers would also need to drive bulldozers,
    increasing the wear and tear on the trails. We can do that for you.
    How about it? There are more and more of us every day. And we vote.

    Sincerely,

    Michael J.
    Vandeman, Ph.D.
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  2. Mike Vandeman said:

    November 24,
    1999
    Tony Acosta
    Director, Office of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Affairs
    1520 Lakeside Drive
    Oakland, CA 94612

    1999! I bet the guy still has it stuck up on his wall, with dart holes all
    over it! LOL

  3. Bill Sornson said:
    Mike Vandeman said:

    November 24,
    1999
    Tony Acosta
    Director, Office of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Affairs
    1520 Lakeside Drive
    Oakland, CA 94612

    1999! I bet the guy still has it stuck up on his wall, with dart holes all
    over it! LOL

    Don't forget the pee stain in
    the center.

  4. More silliness. But it does prove further the illusion that is Vandeman's
    opinions. Again.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.