UK and Europe · Public discussion

Elevation - Google Earth

Started by Ernest · · Last activity · 45 posts · 1,923 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
29 August 2005
Last activity
3 September 2005
Original author
Ernest
Posts
45
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,923
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 45
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Simon Brooke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Graham

    Dean (') said:

    "D.M. Procida" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message



    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Ernest <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > For those without GPS. Google Earth http://earth.google.com/ is a new
    > free
    > map system which allows you to find the elevation of the roads you
    > ride.

    ... but only if you use a virus-compatible operating system.

    So it works with a mac os? or unix variants? 'cause, of course, they're
    virus-compatible...

    Look, let's not wander down this particular troll infested path again.
    Yes, viruses for both Linux and MacOS are theoretically possible. No, no
    virus for Linux has ever been detected in the wild. Move on; nothing to
    see here.

    Yes, but it's not a troll. Simply a fact that ALL operating systems are
    'virus compatible'.
    It is certainly not just 'theoretically possible' - they exist. The fact
    that they're not in the wild,
    particularly, is all about market dynamics, nothing at all about 'security'.

    Don't be so defensive!

    Graham

  2. in message <[email hidden]>, Peter

    Headland (') said:
    Quoted message said:

    describing the Cotswolds as 'mountains'

    As someone who lives (and hikes) where there are real mountains, I
    think describing hills like Scafell Pike, Snowdon, and Ben Nevis as
    "mountains" is stretching a point when it comes to that. :-)

    Oh, I agree completely. We don't (IMHO) have mountains in Britian, which
    is why I think the appellation 'mountain bike' is needless hyperbole.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; better than your average performing pineapple

  3. in message <[email hidden]>, David

    Martin (') said:


    Simon Brooke said:

    in message <[email hidden]>,

    David Martin (') said:

    Nick Kew wrote:
    > Ernest wrote:
    > > For those without GPS. Google Earth http://earth.google.com/ is a
    > > new free map system which allows you to find the elevation of the
    > > roads you ride.
    > >
    > > I have actually measured some of my routes to find out how hard
    > > those hills actually are.
    > > I consider 30m a real hill and just over about 100m can nearly
    > > finish me off.
    >
    > yeahwell, if you're in southern or eastern England, you won't have
    > anything to practice on. Go on hols somewhere hilly and you'll
    > soon be adding an extra 0 to those numbers.

    What a load of ToSH[1].

    Yes, I have to admit I did rather guffaw at that thread. Not unkindly,
    you understand... when visiting relatives in Gloucestershire I once
    overheard locals in the pub describing the Cotswolds as 'mountains'.
    Well, yes, FSVO; and, likewise, the Surrey Hills.

    When did you last ride the North Downs (Surrey/Sussex hills)?

    Never. I don't think I've ever even seen them, except on an ordnance
    survey map.

    Quoted message said:

    A bit
    different to your hills, not as long but much steeper. I used to do a
    route that for the middle 20 miles includes 7 climbs with a 1 in 7 or
    steeper (some 1 in 5 or 1 in 4) of over 100m elevation gain. Vicious.

    I can do 250 metres of ascent in under 1 Km of horizontal travel within
    5Km of my front door, admittedly not tarmaced. And yes, I do ride it. I
    used to ride over the summit of that particular hill (343 metres, of
    which 320 in less than 1.5Km) but that takes more guts and skill than I
    have at my age. 100m at 1 in 7? Well yes, OK, if that's all you've got.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    X-no-archive: No, I'm not *that* naive.

  4. Graham Dean said:


    "Simon Brooke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Graham

    Dean (') said:

    "D.M. Procida" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message



    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Ernest <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    >> For those without GPS. Google Earth http://earth.google.com/ is a new
    >> free
    >> map system which allows you to find the elevation of the roads you
    >> ride.
    >
    > ... but only if you use a virus-compatible operating system.

    So it works with a mac os? or unix variants? 'cause, of course, they're
    virus-compatible...

    Look, let's not wander down this particular troll infested path again.
    Yes, viruses for both Linux and MacOS are theoretically possible. No, no
    virus for Linux has ever been detected in the wild. Move on; nothing to
    see here.

    Yes, but it's not a troll. Simply a fact that ALL operating systems are
    'virus compatible'.
    It is certainly not just 'theoretically possible' - they exist. The fact
    that they're not in the wild,
    particularly, is all about market dynamics, nothing at all about 'security'.

    Don't be so defensive!

    Graham

    Simon's use of the phrase "but only if you use a virus-compatible
    operating system" to mean "but only if you use a Microsoft operating
    system" (Google Earth minimum config - Windows 2000 or XP) *could*
    be considered to be an incident of trolling - in which case you fell
    for it and took the bait. Write out one hundred times "I must not
    respond to trolls":-)

    For what its worth, I don't think Simon was trolling. He just used
    some well known geek humor to express his frustration with the single
    platform limitation of the application in question.

    The discussion of whether Macroshaft really deserves to be the butt
    of such jokes is a minefield which is best avoided, paticularly since
    it is also clearly off topic in uk.rec.cycling

    On the other hand, the Google Earth API is [available][1] so if
    they don't release a version for the rest of us someone else will.
    I even found some [tips][2] on how to do it:-)

    [1]: http://code.google.com/apis.html#earth
    [2]: http://the.taoofmac.com/space/blog/2005-08-27

    Ian

    --
    Ian Gregory
    http://www.zenatode.org.uk/ian/

  5. in message <[email hidden]>, Ian Gregory

    (') said:
    Graham Dean said:


    "Simon Brooke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    in message <[email hidden]>,
    Graham Dean ([email hidden]'😉 wrote:

    > "D.M. Procida" <[email hidden]> wrote
    > in message



    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> Ernest <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >>> For those without GPS. Google Earth http://earth.google.com/ is a
    >>> new free
    >>> map system which allows you to find the elevation of the roads
    >>> you ride.
    >>
    >> ... but only if you use a virus-compatible operating system.
    >
    > So it works with a mac os? or unix variants? 'cause, of course,
    > they're virus-compatible...

    Look, let's not wander down this particular troll infested path
    again. Yes, viruses for both Linux and MacOS are theoretically
    possible. No, no virus for Linux has ever been detected in the wild.
    Move on; nothing to see here.

    Yes, but it's not a troll. Simply a fact that ALL operating systems
    are 'virus compatible'.
    It is certainly not just 'theoretically possible' - they exist. The
    fact that they're not in the wild,
    particularly, is all about market dynamics, nothing at all about
    'security'.

    Don't be so defensive!

    Simon's use of the phrase "but only if you use a virus-compatible
    operating system" to mean "but only if you use a Microsoft operating
    system" (Google Earth minimum config - Windows 2000 or XP) *could*
    be considered to be an incident of trolling - in which case you fell
    for it and took the bait. Write out one hundred times "I must not
    respond to trolls":-)

    Except I didn't - anywhere - use that phrase. Get your attributions
    right.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    Anagram: I'm soon broke.

  6. Simon Brooke said:

    Oh, I agree completely. We don't (IMHO) have mountains in Britian, which
    is why I think the appellation 'mountain bike' is needless hyperbole.

    So what do you think the differences in the design specs should be
    between a bike designed for riding offroad up/down an average 10%
    gradient 3000' hill, and one designed for riding offroad up/down an
    average 10% gradient 15,000' mountain? :-)

    R.

  7. Richard said:
    Simon Brooke said:

    Oh, I agree completely. We don't (IMHO) have mountains in Britian, which
    is why I think the appellation 'mountain bike' is needless hyperbole.

    So what do you think the differences in the design specs should be
    between a bike designed for riding offroad up/down an average 10%
    gradient 3000' hill, and one designed for riding offroad up/down an
    average 10% gradient 15,000' mountain? :-)

    Winter or summer?

    ...d

  8. Simon Brooke said:
    Quoted message said:

    Simon's use of the phrase "but only if you use a virus-compatible
    operating system" to mean "but only if you use a Microsoft operating
    system" (Google Earth minimum config - Windows 2000 or XP) *could*
    be considered to be an incident of trolling - in which case you fell
    for it and took the bait. Write out one hundred times "I must not
    respond to trolls":-)

    Except I didn't - anywhere - use that phrase. Get your attributions
    right.

    That's true, but I bet you thought it.

    Daniele
    --
    Apple Juice www.apple-juice.co.uk
    Chapter Arts Centre
    Market Road
    Cardiff CF5 1QE

  9. D.M. Procida said:
    Simon Brooke said:
    Quoted message said:

    Simon's use of the phrase "but only if you use a virus-compatible
    operating system" to mean "but only if you use a Microsoft operating
    system" (Google Earth minimum config - Windows 2000 or XP) *could*
    be considered to be an incident of trolling - in which case you fell
    for it and took the bait. Write out one hundred times "I must not
    respond to trolls":-)

    Except I didn't - anywhere - use that phrase. Get your attributions
    right.

    That's true, but I bet you thought it.

    As a KNode (and presumably Linux) user he may have thought
    it but I appolgise for not attibuting it correctly to you.

    Does MacSOUP/2.7 use that quoting convention (inserting a
    space between the '>' characters) by default? IMHO it is
    confusing and it has the disadvantage of causing potential
    line-wrap problems to occur earlier in a thread than they
    otherwise would.

    Ian

    --
    Ian Gregory
    http://www.zenatode.org.uk/ian/

  10. Graham Dean said:

    Yes, but it's not a troll. Simply a fact that ALL operating
    systems are 'virus compatible'.
    It is certainly not just 'theoretically possible' - they exist.
    The fact that they're not in the wild, particularly, is all about
    market dynamics, nothing at all about 'security'.

    Any examples of an OS/400 virus? I believe it is theroetically possible
    to create one, especially since the AS/400 moved from a CISC to a RISC
    processor which allows an MI programmer to counterfeit a space pointer,
    but it would certainly be non-trivial. I've certainly not heard of a
    single example in the wild although the integrated file system can of
    course carry viruses that affect lesser operating systems.

    --
    Dave...

  11. Nick Kew said:
    Ernest said:

    For those without GPS. Google Earth http://earth.google.com/ is a new free
    map system which allows you to find the elevation of the roads you ride.

    I have actually measured some of my routes to find out how hard those hills
    actually are.
    I consider 30m a real hill and just over about 100m can nearly finish me
    off.

    yeahwell, if you're in southern or eastern England, you won't have
    anything to practice on. Go on hols somewhere hilly and you'll soon
    be adding an extra 0 to those numbers.

    Some years ago I completed the Raid Pyreenean - without a support
    vehicle and carrying full camping gear. At no point did I have to get
    off and push.

    On my aborted Le Jog attempt two years later, with a similar load, I
    was forced to get off and push up a hill on Exmoor.

    Conclusion: Col Bagargui might be a real bagargui of a hill, and Col
    de Burdincurutcheta a cause a burdin' sensation in your curutcheta -
    but for a real challenge a good hill of Southern England takes a lot
    of beating.

  12. Bertie Wiggins wrote:
    ced to get off and push up a hill on Exmoor.

    Quoted message said:


    Conclusion: Col Bagargui might be a real bagargui of a hill, and Col
    de Burdincurutcheta a cause a burdin' sensation in your curutcheta -
    but for a real challenge a good hill of Southern England takes a lot
    of beating.

    North coast of Devon anyone? That should remove the delusion that thare
    aren't any 'real hills' in the south.

    ...d

  13. Ian Gregory said:

    As a KNode (and presumably Linux) user

    I hope that's not supposed to be an inference?

    KNode is part of KDE. Linux is one of many operating
    systems on which KDE is available as a standard option.

    --
    Not me guv

  14. Nick Kew said:
    Ian Gregory said:

    As a KNode (and presumably Linux) user

    I hope that's not supposed to be an inference?

    KNode is part of KDE. Linux is one of many operating
    systems on which KDE is available as a standard option.

    Covering well over 99% of users, I guess. Although KDE on cygwin is a
    minority interest sport.

    --
    Ambrose

  15. In article said:
    Ian Gregory said:

    As a KNode (and presumably Linux) user

    I hope that's not supposed to be an inference?

    That's OK then because it is not - it is a presumption,
    and a fairly safe one at that.

    Ian

    --
    Ian Gregory
    http://www.zenatode.org.uk/ian/

  16. Ambrose Nankivell said:
    Nick Kew said:
    Ian Gregory said:

    As a KNode (and presumably Linux) user

    I hope that's not supposed to be an inference?

    KNode is part of KDE. Linux is one of many operating
    systems on which KDE is available as a standard option.

    Covering well over 99% of users, I guess.

    Why? Linux users have a wide choice of desktops - more so
    than anyone else.

    My own first encounter with KDE was on FreeBSD, where the
    choice was more limited and KDE was one that happened to
    work 'out of the box'. Apart from Linux and the various BSDs,
    I believe it's also quite popular on Solaris and some of
    the minority platforms these days.

    --
    Nick Kew

  17. David Martin said:

    Bertie Wiggins wrote:
    ced to get off and push up a hill on Exmoor.

    Quoted message said:

    Conclusion: Col Bagargui might be a real bagargui of a hill, and Col
    de Burdincurutcheta a cause a burdin' sensation in your curutcheta -
    but for a real challenge a good hill of Southern England takes a lot
    of beating.

    North coast of Devon anyone? That should remove the delusion that thare
    aren't any 'real hills' in the south.

    Yeah, but Devon is on the northwest side of that line - sometimes
    described as Bristol[1] to the Wash - that divides the flat from
    the hilly (and the stinkin'rich from the rest).

    I can cycle out from my front door and up to 450m on-road in just
    a few miles, or higher offroad if I take a half day out. That's
    pretty high for England.

    [1] Southwest England is evidently too insignificant to merit notice.+

    --
    Nick Kew

  18. Nick Kew said:
    Ambrose Nankivell said:
    Nick Kew said:

    Ian Gregory wrote:

    > As a KNode (and presumably Linux) user

    I hope that's not supposed to be an inference?

    KNode is part of KDE. Linux is one of many operating
    systems on which KDE is available as a standard option.

    Covering well over 99% of users, I guess.

    Why? Linux users have a wide choice of desktops - more so
    than anyone else.

    My own first encounter with KDE was on FreeBSD, where the
    choice was more limited and KDE was one that happened to
    work 'out of the box'. Apart from Linux and the various BSDs,
    I believe it's also quite popular on Solaris and some of
    the minority platforms these days.

    Sorry, I meant that given KDE's ported to cygwin and fink, then well over
    99% of computer users have it available as a standard option, FSVO standard.
    --
    Ambrose

  19. in message <[email hidden]>, Nick Kew

    (') said:
    Ian Gregory said:

    As a KNode (and presumably Linux) user

    I hope that's not supposed to be an inference?

    KNode is part of KDE. Linux is one of many operating
    systems on which KDE is available as a standard option.

    My operating system, as such, is Debian. My particular Debian
    installation does, however, use a Linux kernel, and, indeed, while it is
    possible to run Debian with a BSD or HURD kernel, hardly anyone actually
    does. So his inference is more or less correct.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; Usenet: like distance learning without the learning.

  20. Simon Brooke said:

    in message
    <[email hidden]>, Peter

    Headland (') said:
    Quoted message said:

    describing the Cotswolds as 'mountains'

    As someone who lives (and hikes) where there are real
    mountains, I think describing hills like Scafell Pike,
    Snowdon, and Ben Nevis as "mountains" is stretching a point
    when it comes to that. :-)

    Oh, I agree completely. We don't (IMHO) have mountains in
    Britian, which is why I think the appellation 'mountain bike'
    is needless hyperbole.

    What makes a pile of geology a mountain and not a hill?

    I knew a girl from Colorado[1] who told me, after she had toured
    Scotland, that she was surprised how big the mountains were. I told
    her it was just that her mountains started higher up.
    --
    the.Mark

    [1] She was in Edinburgh doing a course in parks and recreation. That
    sounds like a fun subject.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.