General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Educators Push Drugs

Started by Jan · · Last activity · 2 posts · 418 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
17 August 2003
Last activity
18 August 2003
Original author
Jan
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
418
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Establishment "Educators" Push Drugs On Disruptive, Fussy
    Children!/Reading, Writing and Ritalin!

    For a variety of reason, including boredom, schoolchildren sometimes
    don't pay attention the way the teacher would prefer. In times past,
    the answer has been a suggestion from the teacher to "pay attention," or
    perhaps a slap on the wrist with the ever-present ruler. That was then.
    This is now. Today's answer to fussy children. DRUG THEM!! It is a
    well-established fact that often the most fussy children are often the
    most intelligent. They get bored in a class geared to the less
    intelligent. But we can't have some children singled out as being more
    intelligent. So, in a Machiavellian move to prevent excellence from
    being rewarded and encouraged, the government along with the blessing of
    the Medical Establishment -have decided that fussy children have a
    mental problem.

    But not to worry, they have an answer--it's drugs. Dope those kids
    to the point that they'll sit there in class like good little zombies,
    never educationally outdistancing their lesser endowed classmates! But
    first the parents must be convinced that their children aren't fussy;
    they're fruit cakes. "Don't worry, parents," says the psychiatrist,
    "We can fix that." And if you don't believe them, the pharmaceutical
    companies have jumped on the bandwagon.

    A concerned parent in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania was visiting her
    local bank where she found a stack of pamphlets available for customers
    as a "public service." The name of this pamphlet is "Reading, Writing
    and RITALIN." Ritalin is a stimulant used to ""stabilize" fussy
    children First, "fussy children" isn't scientific enough. No good
    parent is going to agree to have his child drugged (in good conscious)
    because he or she is "fussy." So the American Psychiatric Association
    has come up with a new "spin-drome," that's called "Attention Deficit
    Disorder" or ADD, and its associate "disease" Attention Deficit Disorder
    with Hyperactivity or ADHA. Parents are told that their children are
    "sick." But again, don't worry, there's a solution: You guessed it,
    drugs!

    Here's what the "helpful community service" pamphlet says:
    Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) affects approximately 2 million
    school-age children. No one knows for certain what causes ADD.
    Evidence suggests, however, that a chemical imbalance or deficiencies in
    certain neurotransmitters may be the root of the problem. To identify
    ADD a clinical judgment and an objective assessment is needed. ADD is a
    learning disability, and in approximately 25 percent of the cases other
    impairments exist, therefore a psycoeducational assessment is needed
    including the evaluation of: reasoning skills, use of language,
    perception, attention, memory, visual motor functioning, academic
    achievement and social skills to establish a pattern. Again, don't
    worry. It isn't your child's fault he or she is fussy. It's a chemical
    imbalance or a problem with neurotransmitters in the brains. That's a
    relief. Get out the DRUGS! The situation has progressed to the point
    that a teacher reports a "fussy" student to higher authority and the
    parents are informed that the child should (must) get tested for ADD.

    If you disagree that drugging your fussy child is wrong, even after
    a member in good standing of the APA decides it's the right course of
    action, prepare for a visit from the child welfare juggernaut. And what
    is this Ritalin that "everyone" says is so good for your fussy child?
    Dennis Clarke of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights paints a very
    grim picture of Ritalin. According to Clarke, in 1989, Ritalin was "the
    number one street drug in Canada." He identified it as a "speed-type"
    drug. "Your talking about a chemical that is manufactured by
    CIBA-GEIGY, one of the biggest drug company in the world, which has a
    vested interest to encourage doctors to give ritalin to hyperactive
    children."

    Continuing, Mr. Clarke says, "This drug, when given to a child who
    has not yet entered puberty, has what is called a paradoxical effect.
    It has a reverse effect to what it would have on you or I as adults.
    Whenever you give speed to a child, it has the effect of being a downer.
    Let's take an example: Quaalude, a heavy psychiatric downer, was taken
    off the market by Congress in 1984. If that drug whas given to a child
    it would act as a very potent type of speed. The child would become
    wildly hyperactive, the pulse would increase and the child would be in
    serious trouble. Now, on the other hand, when you give speed to a child
    who has not yet entered puberty, for reasons we don't fully understand,
    it apparently overwhelms the child's central nervous system, cutting the
    motors, making it difficult for the child to move and to communicate.
    CIBA-GEIGY warns that this drug can cause epilepsy in children as well
    as adults. It can cause epileptic seizures where there is no history
    of it."

    Here's what the APA says about the drug: "Poor administration or
    incorrect dosage of Ritalin can lead to some of the following side
    effects: 'Zombie-like' behavior, growth suppression, behavior or thought
    disorder, seizures, headaches, blurred vision, scalp hair loss,
    Tourette's syndrome-including tics, barking like a dog and babbling
    profanities (sounds like Republicans!) It can also result in drug
    dependence and an inclination for criminality." That what the APA says
    about the drug they want to give to your child because he or she is
    "fussy" in school or loses things like pencils or homework assignments.
    Did you ever lose a homework assignment? Do you think you were "sick"
    and in need of a mind-numbing drug to "fix" things" As usual a major
    pharmaceutical company is making profits of misery and destroyed lives
    of others. The Wall Street Journal would probably delight in
    encouraging investors to make a (pun intended) killing in the misery and
    suffering of children!

    1996 Updates - Ritalin Causes Cancer!

    Government scientists have uncovered a sign that the widely used
    children's drug Ritalin may cause cancer in mice. But in their infinite
    wisdom, the FDA decided that it's no big deal and this medicine should
    be prescribed to children anyway.
    "We felt physicians and parents should know this and have a right
    to know this (that ritalin causes cancer)," gushes Dr. Murray Lumpkin,
    the Food and Drug Administration's deputy drug director. Thank you, Mr.
    Lumpkin. When will you decide that the public has a "have a right to
    know" that Ritalin causes cancer in humans. In twenty years or fifty
    years, or ever?
    Ritalin is widely prescribed to treat the spindrome called Attention
    Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, or ADHD, a neurological condition that
    affects 2.5 million children. It is more common in boys than girls and
    sometimes persists to adulthood.
    Ritalin is the brand name of the brain stimulant methylphenidate.
    About 6 millions prescriptions for the generic and brand name versions
    were filled in 1993, the latest data available.
    Mice were fed doses of methylphenidate for two years. Four of the
    male mice who got the highest doses developed cancerous liver tumors,
    called hepatoblastomas, when statistically no more than one of the
    extremely rare tumors should have formed, the study found. The
    laboratory mice also had somewhat elevated levels of a non-cancerous
    liver tumor called hepatocellular adenoma.
    The drug manufacturer, Ciba Geigy Corp. mailed letters in January,
    1996 to 100,000 doctors who prescribe methylphenidate. Needless to say,
    Ciba Geigy downplayed the cancer risk to protect their bottom line. A
    scientist was quoted off the record as stating, "Ciba Geigys history of
    distributing hazardous medicine is terrible. They would do anything
    and have done anything to protect their profits, including promoting
    well-known toxic drugs to adults and children." Again, Established
    Medicine have shown that ethics takes a poor back seat to profits."

  2. Mark Probert said:
    Jan said:

    Establishment "Educators" Push Drugs On Disruptive, Fussy
    Children!/Reading, Writing and Ritalin!

    More drivel from a sales-site. Jan's best material I guess.

    Snip

    Quoted message said:

    1996 Updates - Ritalin Causes Cancer!

    Government scientists have uncovered a sign that the widely used
    children's drug Ritalin may cause cancer in mice.

    But, no showing that it has affected the rate in humans.

    But in their infinite

    Quoted message said:

    wisdom, the FDA decided that it's no big deal and this medicine
    should be prescribed to children anyway.

    While they may not have infinite wisdom, they do know one heck of a lot
    more than Jan or her salesperson.

    Quoted message said:

    "We felt physicians and parents should know this and have a right
    to know this (that ritalin causes cancer)," gushes Dr. Murray Lumpkin,
    the Food and Drug Administration's deputy drug director. Thank you,
    Mr. Lumpkin. When will you decide that the public has a "have a right
    to know" that Ritalin causes cancer in humans. In twenty years or
    fifty years, or ever?

    Strange...this study was widely reported. It did not show that MPH
    caused cancer in humans, and, in the rodents used, it even showed a
    protective effect for female breat cancer.

    Snip

    Quoted message said:

    Mice were fed doses of methylphenidate for two years. Four of
    the male mice who got the highest doses developed cancerous liver
    tumors, called hepatoblastomas, when statistically no more than one of
    the extremely rare tumors should have formed, the study found. The
    laboratory mice also had somewhat elevated levels of a non-cancerous
    liver tumor called hepatocellular adenoma.

    And, omitting the protective effect report..strange that...

    Quoted message said:

    The drug manufacturer, Ciba Geigy Corp. mailed letters in January,
    1996 to 100,000 doctors who prescribe methylphenidate. Needless to
    say, Ciba Geigy downplayed the cancer risk to protect their bottom
    line. A scientist was quoted off the record as stating, "Ciba Geigys
    history of distributing hazardous medicine is terrible. They would
    do anything and have done anything to protect their profits, including
    promoting well-known toxic drugs to adults and children." Again,
    Established Medicine have shown that ethics takes a poor back seat to
    profits."

    Here is the full Medline abstract. Note my highlighting and comments!

    Toxicology. 1995 Nov 30;103(2):77-84. Related Articles, Links

    Experimental studies on the long-term effects of methylphenidate
    hydrochloride.

    Dunnick JK, Hailey JR.

    National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research
    Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.

    Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of methylphenidate
    hydrochloride, a drug used in the treatment of attention-deficient
    disorders, were performed in F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. In these
    studies, methylphenidate hydrochloride was administered for 2 years at
    doses of 0, 100, 500 or 1000 ppm in the feed to rats and at doses of 0,
    50, 250, 500 ppm to mice in groups that consisted of 50
    animals/dose/sex/species. The average amount of methylphenidate consumed
    per day was estimated to be 4-47 mg/kg/day for rats and 5-67 mg/kg/day
    for mice.

    [Comment: Note that the doseage levels are way above those prescribed.]

    *****Survival was similar in dosed and control groups.***** An increase
    in *****benign***** tumors of the liver and increased liver weights were
    observed in male and female mice at the high dose. An increase in
    hepatoblastomas was also seen in *****high dose***** male mice.
    Methylphenidate was not mutagenic in the Salmonella assay system, and it
    is hypothesized that this tumorigenic effect might be due to
    nongenotoxic effects of the chemical such as an increase in cell
    proliferation. *****Increased incidences of neoplasms were not seen in
    rats.*****

    And this:

    However, there was a notable decrease in mammary gland fibroadenomas in
    female rats and a marginal decrease in benign pheochromocytomas in male
    rats. Epidemiology studies of methylphenidate have found no evidence of
    a carcinogenic effect in humans and like our findings in rats, report a
    less than expected rate of cancers in patients taking methylphenidate.

    PMID: 8545847 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    The scaremongers do a lot of careful editing.

    I hit send too soon....

    And this from the main study:

    CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of these 2-year feed studies, there
    was *****no evidence of carcinogenic activity of methylphenidate
    hydrochloride in male or female F344/ N rats receiving 100, 500, or
    1,000 ppm.*****

    There was some evidence of carcinogenic activity of methylphenidate
    hydrochloride in male and female B6C3F1 mice based on the occurrence of
    hepatocellular neoplasms.

    Treatment of female rats with methylphenidate hydrochloride was
    associated with a decrease in the incidence of mammary gland
    fibroadenomas. Administration of methylphenidate hydrochloride to male
    and female mice resulted in increased incidences of eosinophilic foci.
    Synonyms: a-phenyl-2-piperidineacetic acid methyl ester hydrochloride;
    methylphenidylacetate hydrochloride; a-phenyl-a-(2-piperidyl)acetic acid
    methyl ester hydrochloride; methyl a-phenyl-a-(2-piperidyl)acetate
    hydrochloride

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12595924&dopt=Abstract

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.