On 2006-03-11, Ted Linnell (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
Quoted message said:TimC said:On 2006-03-10, Travis (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
Quoted message said:As another person in this thread noted, LED torches are much more
energy efficient than incandescent torches, so the batteries last a lot
longer.
They're not a lot more efficient -- 2 times at most.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:What they are is
a lot less power (unless you're paying for a luxeon). Most worthwhile
incandescent bulbs are at least 2.4W, whereas people seem perfectly
content with 0.2W LEDs which barely light up a dark low speed path.
Tim,
When comparing lights of different types, don't confuse Wattage with
light output. Wattage is a measure of power input, not light output.
For example an 8W fluro puts out a similar amout of light to a 60W
incandecent (tungsten fillament). Halogen bulbs put out more light per
watt than tungsten bulbs.
That said I am not sure how LEDs compare with tungesten or halogen for
light output.
A factor of two or so for halogen, tungsten is a bit crapper though.
Not that much. Tis what I am saying. In fact, I'm not even sure of
that. I am not convinced that a 5W luxeon (LED) is any brighter than
a 5W halogen. I reckon they are *fainter*!
I'd love to put flourescent lights on my bike, but as Zebee mentioned
once, you'd need big optics. The next step in efficiency is of course
the HID. Want!
--
TimC
The triangle wheel was an improvement upon the square wheel:
It eliminates one bump. -- unknown