Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Drink driving penalties

Started by Peter McCallum · · Last activity · 3 posts · 893 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
12 May 2005
Last activity
12 May 2005
Original author
Peter McCallum
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
893
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Letter to the Editor
    Mackay Daily Mercury

    It was reported that a woman who was fined $700 for driving at nearly
    180km/h and $1200 for having more than three times the legal blood
    alcohol concentration (Daily Mercury 12 May 2005 p.18). What a joke!

    Behaviour such as that is the type of terrorism we should be
    concentrating on removing from our society. Unfortunately our traffic
    laws fail to do that.

    Under the Queensland law, this driver could have been given a maximum
    fine of $2100 for driving under the influence. Compare that with the
    maximum penalty for riding a bicycle without a bell, $1500.

    Maybe our magistrates and politicians should use riding a bicycle
    without a bell a benchmark in deciding what penalties should be imposed
    for traffic offences. If something is ten times more dangerous than
    riding a bicycle without a bell, then ten times the maximum penalty
    should apply. I'd imagine that driving under the influence of alcohol
    would then carry a penalty much closer to $200 000 than $2 000.

    That may seem excessive, but ask the families of people whose loved ones
    have been killed by drunk drivers how much their actions have cost them,
    I'm sure $200 000 would be nowhere near the mark.

    --
    Peter McCallum
    Mackay Qld AUSTRALIA

  2. Marty said:

    Tamyka Bell wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If I blog that link, do you reckon I'll end up in the limelight?

    Tam

    Nah, I doubt it. Insult him a bit to rough him up first and then let him
    know you've blogged it.

    Marty

    The question is whether your host can handle it.
    I was /.'ed once and it was funny. I just had to shut down for three
    days until they went away. There is only so much a 28.8K modem link can
    handle {:-).

    The trouble with attracting attention these days is that you don't get
    paid for carrying advertising unless they actually click on the link.
    Otherwise, we could draw straws for a round robin of "stir the troll"
    and join hippy/whomever OS.

  3. Marty said:

    Tamyka Bell wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If I blog that link, do you reckon I'll end up in the limelight?

    Tam

    Nah, I doubt it. Insult him a bit to rough him up first and then let him
    know you've blogged it.

    Marty

    The question is whether your host can handle it.
    I was /.'ed once and it was funny. I just had to shut down for three
    days until they went away. There is only so much a 28.8K modem link can
    handle {:-).

    The trouble with attracting attention these days is that you don't get
    paid for carrying advertising unless they actually click on the link.
    Otherwise, we could draw straws for a round robin of "stir the troll"
    and join hippy/whomever OS.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.