Dr. Sandra Cabot

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Dr. Sandra Cabot
From: "rb" [email hidden]
Date: 3/6/2004 10:16 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

OY VEY I SAY.
YIKES! Even her confreres who's on here know that Hawki is a MAROON.

"Hawki63" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

>Subject: Re: Dr. Sandra Cabot
>From: [email hidden] (Jan)
>Date: 3/6/2004 5:25 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email hidden]>

>You just made a big deal over the fact she uses MD for Americans, who

know

Quoted message said:

>nothing of Aussie rules. Had she said BS, it has a different meaning in

the

Quoted message said:

>US.

jannie

TOO bad!!! she is NOT an MD pure and simple..anywhere on the earth or the
moon!!! she could have just said "Dr Cabot" and used NO initials after

her

Quoted message said:

name...

Poor [censored] hawki, Dr. is also a Ph.D with NO medical traning.

Quoted message said:

you are saying Americans are not smart enuf to "extrapolate" from
facts..

No that's what Quack Barrett says over and over.

The facts are a BS in the US is different that an BS in Australia.

Quoted message said:

It matters not as her degree is equivalent to an MD.

Quoted message said:

equivalent is not enuf

LOL equvialent is just that equivalent=equal.

Quoted message said:

.yikes...you and RB compete for thick headedness

Belittling noted, because you are wrong, just like you were wrong about Hulda
being let off if she went to another country.

Quoted message said:

All this to do is over the fact she uses alternative medicine and is your

Quoted message said:

>repeated way of trying to deceive.

Quoted message said:

The LYING webiste is here with three WHOPPER LIES.

Quoted message said:

>Peter has been asked to copy and paste these LYING claims, he can't he

MADE

Quoted message said:

>THEM UP!!!!

Quoted message said:

no

YES.

Quoted message said:

<snip spam that sells books and asks for money>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

yep..also from HER website

Quoted message said:

..sells books..charges for lectures...this is spam...also more than a tad

unprofessional

You are tring to deceive once again.

By your own definition this is spam.

Proving once again you use *gang* double standards.

Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10
http://www.ratbags.com/loon
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Warning to Jan - this is the second time you have ended one of your
messages using my signature. I almost never complain to ISPs about
anything, but I have a long-standing policy of complaining about
anyone who pretends to be me. The next time you do it I WILL complain
to AOL.

--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Peter,

The University of Melbourne gives good account of what is required to hold
a degree as a "Doctor of Medicine.". Pretty good Uni you would have to
agree.

http://www.unimelb.edu.au/ExecServ/Statutes/r3036.htm

Likewise the University of Texas site also explains what is required to hold
a degree as a "Doctor of Medicine."

http://www.swmed.edu/home_pages/publish/sms_catalog/degree.html

So we can compare that the same requirements are in place between Australia
and USA and indeed the UK, for Doctors to hold a degree called "Doctor of
Medicine."

The University of Bristol refers to the degree "Doctor of Medicine" as "MD"
and the requirement is Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery as is
the case here in Australia.

Now, just so the general audience does not get confused about who has the
right to call themselves an MD, please read the following site (Clause 8
will do nicely.)
from the University of Tasmania.

http://www.admin.utas.edu.au/HANDBOOKS/UTASHANDBOOKS/RULES/rhdmed.html

The use of the term MD is becoming more universal so I think that the point
you were trying to make was simply your way of denigrating Dr Cabot and of
course you eluded that she was not even registered and that no one cared
about this. Are you saying that she has been de-licensed or perhaps just not
registered in Australia at this time ?

Now if you do not fancy the Uni of Tassie, then lets look a little more
closer to home at the University of Queensland.

http://www.uq.edu.au/study/program.html?acad_prog=7504

It does say Doctor of Medicine "MD", does it not.

I think you owe a whole lot of people an apology for the deceiving and near
libellous statements you have made about Dr Cabot MD. Certainly you have
tried to lead people to believe that you know it all with your BA which
simply stands for "Bloody Awful" person.

I think Dr Barrett is no longer registered either.

Cheers, Rod

"Peter Bowditch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"rb" <[email hidden]> wrote:

To save time and repetition, I have put a single reply at the end.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> Yes my dear, PROSECUTED! One can't go around on Australian TV and

Radio

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>and selling millions of copies of her books etc while just openly

pretending

Quoted message said:

>to be a medical Doctor without getting in very very serious trouble

with

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

the

Quoted message said:

>law. That my lady is a serious jail time offense.
>
>How have you supposedly definitely found out that she is LYING about

being a

Quoted message said:

>medical Doctor? Can you prove it?
>
>RB
>

One more time for the brain dead. SHE HAS ALL THE QUALIFICATIONS>

NECESSARY TO PRACTISE MEDICINE IN AUSTRALIA.

What are those "qualifications" for Australia? Don't you have to have

some

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

sort of training? Why don't you go ahead and clear up this little

mystery?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Also too isn't it AGAINST THE LAW to "falsely" claim to be an MD by using
the initials MD behind one's name?

Quoted message said:

Nobody is denying that.

Except maybe Hawki to whom I was addressing my comments and you and the
rest of the gang.

Quoted message said:

What she doesn't have is the right to put the letters "MD" after her>

name. This is not a criminal offence unless she uses it to hold> herself

out

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

to have that particular degree in order to make money. It> is simply a
breach of manners and a lie.

Why doesn't she have the right to put MD behind her name if she has

"ALL

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

THE QUALIFICATIONS NECESSARY TO PRACTISE MEDICINE IN AUSTRALIA" as you

said.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Like I was saying, why hasn't she been arrested for doing just that

UNLESS

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

she is an MD? It's not like she's using those initials in a secretive

manner

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

in an obscure corner of Australia! The authorities must know whom she is

and

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

have already investigated her credentials surely and must have found

nothing

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

amiss. After all, I'm sure Peter Bowditch has already informed on her in

the

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

fond hope that she really wasn't a qualified and licensed MD.

Quoted message said:

As it happens, she doesn't seem to use "MD" in Australia. The web site>

which talks about her Australian seminars and other activities does> not
mention it (except in pictures of the covers of her books). Her US> site,
however, does use the false degree.

Now you mention it. Is it not against the law to do that in the US as

well

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

if one is in truth not an MD!???

Quoted message said:

I'll just say it again, so that it might sink in. The fact that ex-Dr
Cabot has had her registration to practise medicine in Australia
withdrawn means that she must have the necessary qualifications at>

some

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

time.

Those that practise medicine in the US and Canada are called MD's. What

is

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

the equivalent for Australia? If it is "MD" then you're saying she

withdrew

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

her registration! - which registration I'm given to understand, licensed

her

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

to legally practise medicine in Australia in the first place? - which

must

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

have meant that once upon a time she was indeed a licensed MD for

Australia

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

or the MD equivalent thereof? Question is....how could she have gotten
registered in the first place without the necessary degrees etc? Wouldn't
the authorities check up on this to make sure she did indeed have those
necessary qualifications from a recognised institute of higher learning?

Are

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

you saying that she originally misrepresented her qualifications to the
authorities that licensed her to practise medicine in the first place?

Quoted message said:

ex-Dr Cabot has had her registration to practise medicine in
Australia withdrawn <which> means that she must have
<had> the necessary qualifications at some time.

{ **AND*** }

Quoted message said:

SHE HAS ALL THE QUALIFICATIONS NECESSARY > TO PRACTISE MEDICINE IN

AUSTRALIA

By your 1st statement here, do you mean to say that in Australia it is
necessary to have necessary qualifications in order to legally practise
medicine and do you or do you not have to be a qualified and licensed MD

to

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

practise medicine in Australia??? Do you mind clearing up the confusion
inherent between your first and second statements? Considering your 2nd
statement, how do you reconcile it with calling Dr. Cabot the ex-Dr.

Cabot?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Why ex?

Quoted message said:

But I can guarantee that if she got her licence back and
applied for visiting rights at a hospital, she would be a fool to
mention "MD" anywhere.

Doesn't she have "ALL THE QUALIFICATIONS NECESSARY TO PRACTISE MEDICINE

IN

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

AUSTRALIA" as you said???

Perhaps Peter you will be good enough to clear up why you feel this

way?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Do you think and are you saying that all those years ago she DIDN'T have

the

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

necessary qualifications to acquire the right to use the initials MD

behind

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

her name?

Quoted message said:

As an afterthought, it has occurred to me that anyone who has ever>

earned

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

any university degree would be aware of the conventions and> etiquette
associated with what people put after their names. As> r(ectal) b(olus)

and

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Jan have never had the ACTUAL EXPERIENCE, they> probably will never
understand the problem.

The only thing I'm having trouble with is understanding you.

It is not my fault that you are as stupid as a rock.

Doctors in Australia do not call themselves "MD". The abbreviation
does not mean "medical doctor" (even in the USA), but refers to a
university degree called "Doctor of Medicine". Only people holding
such a degree are entitled to put the letters after their names. Ex-Dr
Cabot is perfectly entitled to call herself "Sandra Cabot MB,BS". It
is doubtful whether she should call herself "Doctor" as this is a
courtesy title and she is no longer registered, but nobody really
cares about this.

If you had ever been to a university, you would know that degrees have
names and official abbreviations. A Bachelor of Medicine from most
Australian and UK universities is not called "BM" but is "MB". A
Bachelor of Surgery is called "BS" in Australia but "BChir" or some
variant in the UK. A "BS" from an American university is a Bachelor of
Science, but that is called "BSc" in Australia. I did essentially
science courses at university but I have to put "BA" after my name
because a quirk of my university's rules meant that I was granted a
Bachelor of Arts.

Simple, isn't it?

--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and

C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon

Quoted message said:

To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

"rb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

snipped for focus...

Quoted message said:

Do you have an explanation for why she isn't registered any longer.

I don't, but I hope Peter posts it soon.

Quoted message said:

Barring that technicality I suppose she would have every right to call
herself, what was that again now?........

Actually, she has the right to use those letters after her name regardless
of whether she is licensed to practice.

The Alties and others have often whined that Stephen Barrett no longer has a
licese to practice (he is retired and allowed it to lapse, proof has been
posted). Now, when one of their own is in a similar situation, they weasel
and wiggle.

a MB,BS which surely is the

Quoted message said:

equivalent of MD and perhaps even more, and you guy's loudly squabbling

over

Quoted message said:

my calling her an MD seems too trite a point for you all to have made much
ado about anyways.

It is not YOUR calling her an MD, since you have no credibility. It is her
calling her self and MD, when she knows the degrees she has earned and knows
the difference between them and an MD.

"Rod" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Peter,

The University of Melbourne gives good account of what is required to

hold

Quoted message said:

a degree as a "Doctor of Medicine.". Pretty good Uni you would have to
agree.

If you are claiming that she has a degree issued in Australia called a
Doctor of Medicine, then she has a graduate degree in medicine beyond that
which is required to practice medicine.

However, according to her claims, she has not attended any schools which are
authorized to grant such a degree. To use the "MD" is misleading and
confusing.

"Kim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

<Rich.@.> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:11:31 -0600, "Kim" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Excuse me, but if the stated University doesn't give such a degree, she

is

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

lying. If she is lying about her degree what else may she be lying

about?
=================

Quoted message said:

You don't understand Kim. Alternative practitioners are allowed to
lie. CAbot could say she is an MD. Hulda Clark can say she has the
cure for all cancers.
But you are quite correct that her credibility is very suspect. That
is why I try to demonstrate the lies of some people who post here. You
cannot believe those who repeatedly lie. And the liars don't care
about other liars as long as the lies advance their agenda.

Aloha,

rich

====================
I do remember Mrs. Clarks unsubstantiated cancer cure claims from some

years

Quoted message said:

back. As I recall she was claiming she had a machine that zapped some

type

Quoted message said:

of cancer causing parasites. Were they liver flukes?

You recall good.

Has anything new

Quoted message said:

been learned about said flukes?

Yes. Recent information shows that that appear only in Tiajuan, Mexico at
her clinic. The safest way to avoid them is to stay away from her clinic.

It's also my understanding no flukes were

Quoted message said:

discovered during autopsies of deceased cancer victims.

Lies to advance an agenda? Yes, that happens I'm sure.

"Kim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Ilsa9.1" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:20040305131211.29604.00000900@mb-

Quoted message said:

Truer words have never been spoken. Many come to MHA not to discuss the

pros &

Quoted message said:

cons of Health Alternatives. Many to find unconditional support for

their

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

ritualistic health practices. This group displays highly rigid

thinking,

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

bigotry, below average formal education, and paranoia.

Yes, I'm getting that "message."

Their core tenent of

Quoted message said:

faith is that "You're either with us or against us". They accuse anyone

who

Quoted message said:

asks basic questions about efficacy or dares to take a contrary position

of

Quoted message said:

being a paid agent of a broad, sweeping, global pharm-chem conspiracy.

I can assure everyone I am not being PAID by either side to be here.

According to AltLogic, you just proved you are.

I was

Quoted message said:

just curious about what alternatives people may be using these days. I
myself suffer from mild osteoarthritis and hypothyroidism. I was

wondering

Quoted message said:

what may have been proven helpful other than the Levoxyl I take. I don't
take anything for the arthritis since it is so mild.

Quoted message said:

That group is very vocal and a detriment to those who wish to discuss

more

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

substantial, plausible, and practical matters.

I understand.....

Kim

"Kim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"rb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Gymmy, that lady is top flight in every way and they know it. but what

can

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

we expect of them? They are paid to do this(debunk non conventional
medicine). Paid shills.....that's what they are.

========================
Who is paying them (either side) and where is the proof anyone is being
paid? What are you basing this accusation on?

Idle speculation.

Even the technicians on the

Quoted message said:

MS Newsgroups are not paid.

Kim

"rb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Kim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"rb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Gymmy, that lady is top flight in every way and they know it. but what

can

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

we expect of them? They are paid to do this(debunk non conventional
medicine). Paid shills.....that's what they are.

========================
Who is paying them (either side) and where is the proof anyone is being
paid? What are you basing this accusation on? Even the technicians on

the

Quoted message said:

MS Newsgroups are not paid.

Kim

I have no proof.

As i said in the past, idle speculation, and then s/h/it proves it:

It is just my own personal opinion based upon the

Quoted message said:

precept that nobody can be so stupid so as to deny the efficacy of plainly
efficacious treatments(such as chelation therapy and mercury amalgam

removal

Quoted message said:

among other's), so to obstinately and obnoxiously deny the efficacy of

such

Quoted message said:

well known and plainly efficacious alternative treatments(such as

chelation

Quoted message said:

therapy and mercury amalgam removal among other's) one can only logically
deduce that, again, nobody remotely intelligent being stupid enough to

deny

Quoted message said:

the efficaciousness of such alternative treatments, they can only be
obstinately and obnoxiously doing this because they are being paid to do

so!

In article <[email hidden]>,

rb said:

"Kim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"rb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Gymmy, that lady is top flight in every way and they know it. but what

can

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

we expect of them? They are paid to do this(debunk non conventional
medicine). Paid shills.....that's what they are.

========================
Who is paying them (either side) and where is the proof anyone is being
paid? What are you basing this accusation on? Even the technicians on
the MS Newsgroups are not paid.

Quoted message said:

I have no proof. It is just my own personal opinion based upon the
precept that

that you are an idiot who fails to understand that you could be wrong?

Quoted message said:

nobody can be so stupid so as to deny the efficacy of plainly
efficacious treatments(such as chelation therapy and mercury amalgam
removal among other's),

Except that these aren't "plainly efficacious." Particularly
chelation therapy, which in multiple clinical trials has failed
to work any better than placebo. No matter how much you try to
wish that fact away, it won't go away.

Quoted message said:

one can only logically deduce that, again, nobody remotely
intelligent being stupid enough to deny the efficaciousness of such
alternative treatments, they can only be obstinately and obnoxiously
doing this because they are being paid to do so!

You need some sort of treatment that will keep you from repeating
yourself over and over. Oh, and a logic course would also be a
good idea, as you clearly don't understand the concept at all.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

"Mark Probert-March 7, 2004" <Mark [email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"rb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

snipped for focus...

Quoted message said:

Do you have an explanation for why she isn't registered any longer.

I don't, but I hope Peter posts it soon.

As I have said, I have heard rumours but I don't plan to spend any
time in court so I won't repeat them.

There does not appear to be an online list of all registered medical
practitioners in Australia, and, in any case, registration is a state
responsibility. Details about doctors who are struck off is protected
by privacy laws unless the story gets into the papers, like it did for
Dr William McBride, who had his licence yanked when his fraudulent
medical research into Debendox was revealed (he is now allowed to
practise again, but cannot do research), and Dr Geoffrey Edelsten, who
employed a professional hitman (who is now himself missing, presumed
dead) to collect some money from a patient.

I have written to the NSW Medical Registration Board to ask what I can
find and where I can find it. I expect a reply at the speed of
bureaucracy, which means any week now.

--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

We all know

"Hawki63" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Dr. Sandra Cabot
From: "Gymmy Bob" [email hidden]
Date: 3/6/2004 6:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

You yanks are all the same. "College" is a technical education in this
country. Universities are classed a little higher.

ok then...university...tho they are one and the same...HERE,,,
hawki.....

Peter Bowditch said:

"Mark Probert-March 7, 2004" <Mark [email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"rb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

snipped for focus...

Quoted message said:

Do you have an explanation for why she isn't registered any longer.

I don't, but I hope Peter posts it soon.

As I have said, I have heard rumours

Priceless!

Thank you so much for those words.

You see, I had been quite troubled over the condition of my own small model
bullsh*tometer, which has been making these quite remarkable "Bleep, bleep,
HIC! splutter, splutter, HIC! bleeeee...p" sounds, while rattling and
shaking on its desk, for some days now. And as we all know, qualified and
reliable bullsh*tometer-repairers can be difficult to find these days..

🙂

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

Quoted message said:

"rb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Gymmy, that lady is top flight in every way and they know it. but what can
we expect of them? They are paid to do this(debunk non conventional
medicine). Paid shills.....that's what they are.

========================
Who is paying them (either side) and where is the proof anyone is being
paid? What are you basing this accusation on? Even the technicians on the
MS Newsgroups are not paid.

Kim

The problem is not the implausibility of their claim. The problem is in their
use of language. When they say that people are paid to debunk alt-health
techniques, it means that they can't support their own claims.

Quoted message said:

You see, I had been quite troubled over the condition of my own small model
bullsh*tometer, which has been making these quite remarkable "Bleep, bleep,
HIC! splutter, splutter, HIC! bleeeee...p" sounds, while rattling and
shaking on its desk, for some days now.

No surprise there, it's because of the proximity
of the user (you) to the bullsh*tometer.

What happened to your Google-News account ?

- Just Wondering

--

Take out the G'RBAGE for private replies.
[email hidden]

"Mark Probert-March 7, 2004" <Mark [email hidden]> wrote
in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Kim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

<Rich.@.> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:11:31 -0600, "Kim" <[email hidden]>
>Excuse me, but if the stated University doesn't give such a degree,

she

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

is

Quoted message said:

>lying. If she is lying about her degree what else may she be lying

about?
=================

Quoted message said:

You don't understand Kim. Alternative practitioners are allowed to
lie. CAbot could say she is an MD. Hulda Clark can say she has the
cure for all cancers.
But you are quite correct that her credibility is very suspect. That
is why I try to demonstrate the lies of some people who post here. You
cannot believe those who repeatedly lie. And the liars don't care
about other liars as long as the lies advance their agenda.

Aloha,

rich

====================
I do remember Mrs. Clarks unsubstantiated cancer cure claims from some

years

Quoted message said:

back. As I recall she was claiming she had a machine that zapped some

type

Quoted message said:

of cancer causing parasites. Were they liver flukes?

You recall good.

Has anything new

Quoted message said:

been learned about said flukes?

Yes. Recent information shows that that appear only in Tiajuan, Mexico at
her clinic. The safest way to avoid them is to stay away from her clinic.

It's also my understanding no flukes were

Quoted message said:

discovered during autopsies of deceased cancer victims.

Lies to advance an agenda? Yes, that happens I'm sure.

Actually Dr. Valerie Saxon has some expelled Liver Flukes preserved in a
jar! Nasty fair sized critters they are. If you want to know more about
parasites you should contact her.

RB

Quoted message said:

Oh what a web Peter weaves when first he set's out to deceive.

RB

"Peter Bowditch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

As I have said, I have heard rumours but I don't plan to spend any> time

in court so I won't repeat them.> > There does not appear to be an online
list of all registered medical> practitioners in Australia, and, in any
case, registration is a state> responsibility. Details about doctors who are
struck off is protected> by privacy laws unless the story gets into the
papers, like it did for> Dr William McBride, who had his licence yanked when
his fraudulent> medical research into Debendox was revealed (he is now
allowed to> practise again, but cannot do research), and Dr Geoffrey
Edelsten, who> employed a professional hitman (who is now himself missing,
presumed

Quoted message said:

dead) to collect some money from a patient.>
I have written to the NSW Medical Registration Board to ask what I can>

find and where I can find it. I expect a reply at the speed of> bureaucracy,
which means any week now.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

You see, I had been quite troubled over the condition of my own small
model bullsh*tometer, which has been making these quite remarkable
"Bleep, bleep, HIC! splutter, splutter, HIC! bleeeee...p" sounds,
while rattling and shaking on its desk, for some days now.

No surprise there, it's because of the proximity
of the user (you) to the bullsh*tometer.

I have a small edition only, set for Newsgroup posts, and I wasn't posting.
🙂 And, it is not infallible (sigh).

Quoted message said:

What happened to your Google-News account ?

Thanks for asking. Some sort of a bug has prevented my posting from
Google. Even to set up a new account. I follow through, send the post,
read the record of it being sent, - then nothing. Or in the case of the
attempted new account, receive the message, "An email has been sent to that
address; click on the link it contains to begin your new account" (not
exact wording) - but no email ever arrives.

What is with the new thread name?

Quoted message said:

- Just Wondering

Likewise.

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

Quoted message said:

Peter Bowditch said:

"Mark Probert-March 7, 2004" <Mark [email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"rb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

snipped for focus...

> Do you have an explanation for why she isn't registered any longer.

I don't, but I hope Peter posts it soon.

As I have said, I have heard rumours

Priceless!

Thank you so much for those words.

You see, I had been quite troubled over the condition of my own small model
bullsh*tometer, which has been making these quite remarkable "Bleep, bleep,
HIC! splutter, splutter, HIC! bleeeee...p" sounds, while rattling and
shaking on its desk, for some days now. And as we all know, qualified and
reliable bullsh*tometer-repairers can be difficult to find these days..

🙂

Thank you for dishonestly snipping the rest of what I wrote, where I
said that I had contacted the appropriate regulatory authorities for
details.

I will give you a hint - medicine cabinet. But I stress that it is
only a rumour. What is not a rumour is the fact that she is not
allowed to practise medicine in Australia, despite having all the
necessary qualifications.

--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Peter Bowditch said:

[email hidden] wrote:

What is not a rumour is the fact that she is not
allowed to practise medicine in Australia, despite having all the
necessary qualifications.

WRONG!!

I finally got through to the NSW Med Reg Board myself, in regard to that
specific question.

What a waste of time this has been.

Here is the number for anyone who wishes to check (minus country code):

(02) 7879 2200

(Bearing in mind that her own name is not that under which she writes, as
per "Dr James Wright" of radio fame.)

She is a practicing, legally registered, _respected_ Medical Doctor to this
day!

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

That guy still here?

"rb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Oh what a web Peter weaves when first he set's out to deceive.

RB

"Peter Bowditch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

As I have said, I have heard rumours but I don't plan to spend any> time

in court so I won't repeat them.> > There does not appear to be an online
list of all registered medical> practitioners in Australia, and, in any
case, registration is a state> responsibility. Details about doctors who

are

Quoted message said:

struck off is protected> by privacy laws unless the story gets into the
papers, like it did for> Dr William McBride, who had his licence yanked

when

Quoted message said:

his fraudulent> medical research into Debendox was revealed (he is now
allowed to> practise again, but cannot do research), and Dr Geoffrey
Edelsten, who> employed a professional hitman (who is now himself missing,
presumed

Quoted message said:

dead) to collect some money from a patient.>
I have written to the NSW Medical Registration Board to ask what I can>

find and where I can find it. I expect a reply at the speed of>

bureaucracy,

Quoted message said:

which means any week now.

Quoted message said: