General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Dr. Andrew Weill

Started by Kathryn Friesen · · Last activity · 4 posts · 714 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
19 December 2003
Last activity
20 December 2003
Original author
Kathryn Friesen
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
714
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. What is his current "standing" (if any) in the traditional medical community?

    In the alternative/complimentary community?

    Or has his time come & gone?

    I was glancing through a holistic magazine yesterday in the supermarket, wherein he has a Q&A
    column. I thought his answers rather "practical" & not "far out" as I would have expected from
    hearing "about" him.

  2. "Kathryn Friesen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    What is his current "standing" (if any) in the traditional medical community?

    In the alternative/complimentary community?

    Or has his time come & gone?

    I was glancing through a holistic magazine yesterday in the supermarket, wherein he has a Q&A
    column. I thought his answers rather "practical" & not "far out" as I would have expected from
    hearing "about" him.

    I don't regard him as hard-core alternative. For example he stated recently in a radio interview
    that "placebos are the meat of medicine". This reflects his major interest, which is "mind-body"
    medicine . It positions him at the "feel-good, feel-better" end of medicine, rather than among those
    pretending have the answer to difficult medical problems.

    He annoys me immensely in one way, as one of the more sensible "alternative" practitioners. He
    actually said in the TV debate with Dr Relman " a lot of it (alternative medicine) is ridiculous and
    a lot is dangerous". He nevertheless still panders to the alt mentality by never commiting himself
    to more than a "I personally am not convinced" about even the most ridiculous drivel, such as that
    of Hulda Clark, even though I am absolutely certain he regards it as drivel. But he would perhaps
    see it as having useful placebo actions for some.

    Peter Moran

    .

  3. He fielded three questions in that article.

    One was about te benefits of a three-day juice fast. His answer was along the lines that it probably
    wouldn't hurt & makes some people feel better. (I could have answered that one.)

    One question was about colonic irrigation & he obviously is not a fan of that idea, saying, in so
    many words, that he considered this somewhat popular practice unnecessary & even dangerous.

    The third, if I recall correctly, was a question about walking as good exercise. Nothing
    earthshattering in his comments there either.

  4. "Kathryn Friesen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    He fielded three questions in that article.

    One was about te benefits of a three-day juice fast. His answer was along the lines that it
    probably wouldn't hurt & makes some people feel better. (I could have answered that one.)

    One question was about colonic irrigation & he obviously is not a fan of that idea, saying, in so
    many words, that he considered this somewhat popular practice unnecessary & even dangerous.

    Thanks for telling me that . I change my opinion, if he is actually taking a stand on some things.
    That is a rarety among alt practitioners and supporters. I formed my assessment a year or two ago
    when I looked at the answers to questions on his web site.

    Peter

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.