Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Double step gearing

Started by Doug Goncz · · Last activity · 4 posts · 937 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
23 December 2003
Last activity
5 January 2004
Original author
Doug Goncz
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
937
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Here's an interesting gear combination for you gearheads:

    24 / 35 / 52 x 11 / 15 / 16 / 19 / 23 / 28 / 34

    This actually works out to an eleven speed.

    I find the steps particularly even, though large. And the double step means there is a lot of
    duplication. You gear down two in back and up one in front, no matter where you are, to find a
    duplicate. I think that requires a lot of planning and terrain awareness from the rider, but little
    looking down at the indactors, if equipped, or wondering what's next. Less confusion and more
    awareness.

    In fact, if you take the log of the ratios and scale from 1 to 21, you find the only gears provided
    are odd numbers. All of them. Eleven neatly spaced gears with duplicates. I rule out big/big and
    small/small and their two adjacent positions due to chainline and chain length problems.

    I'm currently running 24/38/52 and am having trouble. I've ordered an R440 FD to try this with. If
    it doesn't work I'll go 42 middle front for a single/triple step setup.

    I don't know how it's going to shift. It's got a whopping second/large front step. Really huge. The
    R440 is for cogs up to 53.

    I've got a Mathcad spreadsheet showing the logarithms if you'd like, or you can go to
    sheldonbrown.com, who are supplying the parts, and use their gear computer, or another of
    your choice.

    I like the idea of looking ahead and saying _in advance_ which range I need to be in. We'll just
    have to see if I am capable of this. I plan on setting up a beeper to warn me when I get adjacent
    big/big or small/small so I can reverse the commanded shift and get back to a range.

    They say we are far from half-step / granny now and are more like low/med/high "range" gearing.
    Well, this takes that to the extreme. It's like 48% from 24 to 35, and then 49% from 35 to 52. Very
    even there. And the rear is like 18-20-21-20-21-18% or something like that. Even.

    Now if I could just get that FLIR system up to read the terrain and make all the shifts for me. Ah
    well, after I get the Dewars installed, maybe.

    But will it shift? And if it won't, and I can't buy a derailer, how do I build a derailer or
    derailer cage that will shift it?

    I have a milling machine and small lathe.

    Do you know how hard it is to find a 110/35 cog? Jeez, that's a hen's tooth.

    My senior project at ODU: Google Groups, then "dgoncz" and some of: ultracapacitor bicycle
    fluorescent flywheel inverter Equipped with BoBike Mini removable child seat, too!

  2. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    ...

    Quoted message said:

    But will it shift? And if it won't, and I can't buy a derailer, how do I build a derailer or
    derailer cage that will shift it?

    Is your concern with the front? Because you should have no problem with the rear if you use a wide-
    range der like a Deore.

    ....

    --
    Dave Kerber Fight spam: remove the ns_ from the return address before replying!

    REAL programmers write self-modifying code.

  3. Doug Goncz said:

    Here's an interesting gear combination for you gearheads:
    24 / 35 / 52 x 11 / 15 / 16 / 19 / 23 / 28 / 34 I don't know how it's going to shift. It's got a
    whopping second/large front step. Really huge. The R440 is for cogs up to 53.

    I use a 52/34 double with a normal Tiagra front derailleur (intended for use with triples, so
    effectively I have your setup with the granny missing) without any trouble; of course, this is
    without indexed front shifting. I think with friction front shifting almost any derailleur will do
    provided the cage can physically accomodate the chain in all postions.
    --
    David Damerell <[email hidden]> flcl?

  4. David Damerell said:

    I use a 52/34 double with a normal Tiagra front derailleur (intended for use with triples...of
    course, this is without indexed front shifting. I think with friction front shifting almost any
    derailleur will do provided the cage can physically accomodate the chain in all postions.

    That's true for doubles, and, in fact, even front indexing isn't fussy at all with doubles. Anything
    that can shift three can also shift two.

    For triples, it's a different story. Even with friction, an even-spaced triple setup needs a
    "triple" type front derailer to make a reliable shift from the granny to the middle. (Old-fashioned
    half-step setups, where the two outer chainrings are nearly the same size, work fine with "double"
    type front derailers.)

    Sheldon "Insert Nickname Here" Brown +--------------------------------------------------------+
    | There is no conclusive evidence of life after death. | But there is no evidence of any sort
    | against it. | Soon enough you will know, so why fret about it? | --Robert A. Heinlein |
    +--------------------------------------------------------+ Harris Cyclery, West Newton,
    Massachusetts Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 harriscyclery.comharriscyclery.com Hard-to-find parts
    shipped Worldwide captainbike.comcaptainbike.com sheldonbrown.comsheldonbrown.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.