Does Zwifts pricing strategy assume that all users have an unlimited budget for high-end hardware and software, or are they simply tone-deaf to the financial realities of the average cyclist? It seems like every new feature or update requires a significant investment in new equipment or a pricey subscription, with no consideration for those who cant afford to keep up with the latest and greatest.
Is it really necessary to have a smart trainer, a high-end power meter, and a top-of-the-line computer just to get the most out of the platform? And what about the constant stream of must-have accessories and upgrades that seem to come out every few months? Its starting to feel like Zwift is catering exclusively to the 1% of cyclists who have the means to drop thousands of dollars on gear and software without batting an eye.
Meanwhile, the rest of us are left to struggle with outdated equipment and limited functionality, forced to choose between upgrading our gear or getting left behind. Its not like were asking for much - just a platform thats accessible and affordable for cyclists of all levels and budgets. But it seems like Zwift is more concerned with courting the high-end market and raking in the cash than with providing a quality experience for all users.
Can anyone explain to me why Zwift seems to be so out of touch with the financial realities of the average cyclist, and whether there are any plans to make the platform more accessible and affordable for those who cant afford to break the bank?
Is it really necessary to have a smart trainer, a high-end power meter, and a top-of-the-line computer just to get the most out of the platform? And what about the constant stream of must-have accessories and upgrades that seem to come out every few months? Its starting to feel like Zwift is catering exclusively to the 1% of cyclists who have the means to drop thousands of dollars on gear and software without batting an eye.
Meanwhile, the rest of us are left to struggle with outdated equipment and limited functionality, forced to choose between upgrading our gear or getting left behind. Its not like were asking for much - just a platform thats accessible and affordable for cyclists of all levels and budgets. But it seems like Zwift is more concerned with courting the high-end market and raking in the cash than with providing a quality experience for all users.
Can anyone explain to me why Zwift seems to be so out of touch with the financial realities of the average cyclist, and whether there are any plans to make the platform more accessible and affordable for those who cant afford to break the bank?