Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Does the bike make a difference?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 5 posts · 575 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
21 July 2005
Last activity
28 July 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
575
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm a long time (3 years ) rider of recumbents and have always wondered
    if the bike you ride could make that much difference in average speed.
    Particularly if your an avewrage rider or commuter as I am who is not
    in racing condition. Well to get to the point, I've been commuting
    between 12 to 20 miles almost daily on a Burley Taiko set up in the SWB
    position averaging between 11.3 to 13.1 mi/hr. The average is probably
    12.4 mi/hr. I ride as fast as I'm able but restricted by age and
    arthritis. I could probably go faster, but there is an outside limit
    that my joints can take. You might even think of this as a biological
    governor.

    Recently purchased an 03 left over Vision r-64 and my first commute
    averaged an astounding 14.9 mi/hr. Later in the week when the novelty
    wore off and I was closer to my normal pain threshold I clock 14.4
    mi/hr average. The vision high racer with 650c wheels is by no means
    the top of the line nor is it the only fast bike out there. But there
    it is for you fellow duffers who think that nothing can help, that it's
    all in the engine. 2 mi /hr represents a 16% increase in average
    speed. My only regret is that I didn't do this 3 years ago.

    Gene Cosloy

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm a long time (3 years ) rider of recumbents and have always wondered
    if the bike you ride could make that much difference in average speed.
    Particularly if your an avewrage rider or commuter as I am who is not
    in racing condition. Well to get to the point, I've been commuting
    between 12 to 20 miles almost daily on a Burley Taiko set up in the SWB
    position averaging between 11.3 to 13.1 mi/hr. The average is probably
    12.4 mi/hr. I ride as fast as I'm able but restricted by age and
    arthritis. I could probably go faster, but there is an outside limit
    that my joints can take. You might even think of this as a biological
    governor.

    Recently purchased an 03 left over Vision r-64 and my first commute
    averaged an astounding 14.9 mi/hr. Later in the week when the novelty
    wore off and I was closer to my normal pain threshold I clock 14.4
    mi/hr average. The vision high racer with 650c wheels is by no means
    the top of the line nor is it the only fast bike out there. But there
    it is for you fellow duffers who think that nothing can help, that it's
    all in the engine. 2 mi /hr represents a 16% increase in average
    speed. My only regret is that I didn't do this 3 years ago.

    Gene Cosloy

    The Vision is more laid-back than the Burley which is the main reason for
    your increase.

  3. Gene Cosloy said:

    Recently purchased an 03 left over Vision r-64 and my first
    commute averaged an astounding 14.9 mi/hr.
    ...
    2 mi /hr represents a 16% increase in average speed.

    Yep, the bike can certainly make a difference. When I started riding my
    Tour Easy, my 13-mile commute time went from 55 minutes to 45 minutes, a
    22% increase in average speed.

    --
    "Bicycling is a healthy and manly pursuit with much
    to recommend it, and, unlike other foolish crazes,
    it has not died out." -- The Daily Telegraph (1877)

  4. I doubt that is the only reason Mike. I'm about the same laid back
    angle on both bikes, however the vision BB is about 4 " higher than the
    Burley from the seat heights. I think a combination of air resistance
    being lower, lower friction from high pressure low width tires, lower
    roatating mass on the wheels and about 3 lbs. less weight overall all
    contribute. Oh yes the handlebars on the vision cause your arms to tuck
    in closer to the body reducing air resistance as well. Any way I'm
    thrilled I can keep up and even pass some DF bikes now.

    Gene

  5. <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Any way I'm thrilled I can keep up and even pass
    some DF bikes now.

    So can I, just not the particularly fast ones... %^)
    Some I can even pass on my BikeE! %^P

    I seem to be slightly faster on my Volae than on my
    Tour Easy,-- under similar conditions, maybe as much
    as 10%...

    Jon Meinecke

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.