"pslant" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:I'm trying to make sense of some fundamental genetics
and I struggle with this question; If the only
information in the dna that is relevant are genes
(correct me if I'm wrong)
If, by a "gene" you mean a protein coding sequence, then you
are wrong. There are other things in DNA between coding
sequences that are relevant.
Quoted message said:it shouldnt matter if 2 genes changed position? Or
does it?
It sometimes makes a big difference. But sometimes only a
subtle one.
Quoted message said:If it does make a difference: could conceivably 2 genes
have the exact same nukleotid-sequence?
Yes
Quoted message said:The reason I ask is to understand the "placement" of
proteins. If a protein from a specific gene is placed in
som gland,how does it know where to go. If the answer is
that only cells in that gland "use" that specific gene,
how does cells in other parts of the body know NOT to make
that protein?
THAT is a VERY big topic.
Quoted message said:As you see I'm new to this, references would be much
appreciated!
I am really impressed that someone who is "new to this"
would ask such penetrating questions. There are whole
research disciplines, with conferences and journals of their
own, devoted to these topics.
May I suggest that the best way to get a "big picture" view
of what is known about these things is to go to the library
and pick up a textbook on molecular biology or molecular
genetics. Watson or Alberts would be good. No need to read
the whole thing - just use the table of contents to find the
topics you are interested in, and then use the index to find
the prerequisite info you need to understand things.
The WEB is a useful resource, but there is no substitute for
a textbook in providing the framework for understanding a
subject. Not yet, anyways.