His time was similar to Floyd's. Why dont we concentrate on implicating
Oscar in doping scandal? Floyd won this race and I dont appreciate
Oscar claiming he is now the winner and he resents missing the award
ceremony.
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Does Oscar Pereiro use doping?
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 6 August 2006
- Last activity
- 7 August 2006
- Original author
- Email address hidden
- Posts
- 5
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 492
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Quoted message said:
His time was similar to Floyd's. Why dont we concentrate on implicating
Oscar in doping scandal? Floyd won this race and I dont appreciate
Oscar claiming he is now the winner and he resents missing the award
ceremony.
A cyclingnews.com article a week or so ago described avoiding detection
of drug use as an intelligence test. Floyd failed. Oscar passed. -
Quoted message said:
I dont appreciate
Oscar claiming he is now the winner and he resents missing the award
ceremony.Did Oscar really say that?
-
in message <[email hidden]>,
(') said:
His time was similar to Floyd's. Why dont we concentrate on implicating
Oscar in doping scandal? Floyd won this race and I dont appreciate
Oscar claiming he is now the winner and he resents missing the award
ceremony.Pereiro was tested on very nearly every single day Landis was tested -
and at least one day when Landis wasn't tested. He was tested as many
times as Landis. If he cheated - and I see no reason to believe he did -
he got away with it.Landis was a cheat. Pereiro was /probably/ not. That's really all there
is to say about it.--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/;; no eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn.
;; Jim Morrison -
Simon Brooke said:
Landis was a cheat. Pereiro was /probably/ not. That's really all there
is to say about it.The qualifier "probably" is too specific for me. I'd say: there is no
evidence. Or: currently no evidence. Or: he is currently not Pounded
by any anti-doping witch hunt.--
E. Dronkert
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.