Path:
typhoon.sonic.net!not-for-mail
Message-ID:
<[email hidden]>
From:
Mark Thorson <[email hidden]>
X-Mailer:
Mozilla 4.6 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language:
en
MIME-Version:
1.0
Newsgroups:
misc.health.alternative
Subject:
Re: Jan Drew Can't Answer
References:
<[email hidden]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Lines:
51
Date:
Sun, 28 Dec 2003 21:39:12 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:
209.148.113.178
X-Complaints-To:
[email hidden]
X-Trace:
typhoon.sonic.net 1072647552 209.148.113.178 (Sun,
28 Dec
2003 13:39:12 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date:
Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:39:12 PST
Xref:
typhoon.sonic.net misc.health.alternative:373053
Jan the Accuser said:Quoted message said:The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath
Lake,
Quoted message said:produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized
asaddictive), and that Cell Tech
***deliberately**** avoids testing for this
Quoted message said:toxin
THERE IS THE LIE!!!!!
Well, Jan, what exactly do the statements referred to
by this statement say? What is the original statement
which is a lie?
You say that there is a lie in the file "An Anatoxin-A Primer".
Let's see that lie. Post a WHOLE ORIGINAL STATEMENT
from that file which is a lie. Not the whole file, just a statement
which is a LIE.
Certainly, you know where that part is, don't you Jan?
Or do you just accuse people of being liars without
regard to whether they've lied or not.
Why don't you post this part, Jan? Then you'd prove
that I'd lied, by posting the actual lie itself, rather than
merely a statement that refers to the (alleged) lie.
Why don't you do that, Jan?
Is it because if you did, everybody would see that this statement
is OBVIOUSLY NOT A LIE?
Is it because if you did, everybody would see the Jan Drew
has FALSELY ACCUSED me of being a LIAR?
Is it because if you did, everybody would see that it is
Jan Drew who is the LIAR?
Is that it, Jan?
Is that why you won't post this LIE you claim I told?
You are a despicable human being.