General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Does anyone knows about the aging gene?

Started by Red Dragon · · Last activity · 3 posts · 254 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 December 2003
Last activity
30 December 2003
Original author
Red Dragon
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
254
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Is there such thing as a gene responsible for the aging process? Is it true that such a gene can be
    modified or manipulated to extend a life span? Is there a possibility that in the distant future,
    immortality in man can be achieved?

    Thanks Khoon

  2. "Red Dragon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message.

    Quoted message said:


    Is there such thing as a gene responsible for the aging process? Is it true that such a gene can
    be modified or manipulated to extend a life span? Is there a possibility that in the distant
    future, immortality in


    man

    Quoted message said:

    can be achieved?


    There are two major reasons why organisms age.

    The first is that most organisms can't expect to survive for many mating seasons. A gene that gives
    you 10 eggs in the first year at the cost of none in the second year is to be preferred to on that
    gives you five eggs now and 10 in the second year.

    Another reason is that cancer is a persistent threat. Somehow cells have to be prevented from
    multiplying in an uncontrolled fashion. One mechanism for this is to limit the total number of
    divisions a non-germ cell is allowed, so tumors don't get indefinitely big. A sdie effect is that
    this puts an age limit on the organism.

    The problems in extending the lifespan of humans via genetic engineering are formidable, but seem to
    be purely technical. There's no reason that humans couldn't live for thousands of years. It wouldn't
    of course be immortality - there would still be accidents and other causes of death.

  3. << There are two major reasons why organisms age.

    The first is that most organisms can't expect to survive for many mating seasons. A gene that gives
    you 10 eggs in the first year at the cost of none in the second year is to be preferred to on that
    gives you five eggs now and 10 in the second year.

    Another reason is that cancer is a persistent threat. Somehow cells have to be prevented from
    multiplying in an uncontrolled fashion. One mechanism for this is to limit the total number of
    divisions a non-germ cell is allowed, so tumors don't get indefinitely big. A sdie effect is that
    this puts an age limit on the organism.

    TH It may be a case where the growing stops or it slows down to a level below what's being destroyed
    at the same time. So that what is being built up is less than what is being broken down.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.