So, lets say youve decided to switch to shorter cranks on your gravel bike - because, you know, everyones doing it, and you dont want to be the only one left in the dust. But heres the thing: do you really need to adjust the flare on your handlebars to compensate for the reduced crank length? Or is this just another example of the bike industry trying to sell you something you dont need?
I mean, think about it: shorter cranks are supposed to make your bike more comfortable and efficient, but if you dont adjust the handlebar flare, wont that just throw off the whole geometry of the bike? Or does the reduced crank length somehow magically cancel out any potential issues with the handlebars?
And whats the actual impact on the bikes handling? Do shorter cranks make the bike more twitchy or unstable, requiring a wider flare to compensate? Or does the shorter crank length actually make the bike more stable, allowing you to get away with a narrower flare?
Ive seen some people say that the flare needs to be adjusted to maintain the same riding position and comfort level, but others claim that its not necessary at all. So, whos right? Is this just a matter of personal preference, or is there actual science behind it?
And what about the different types of riders out there? Do endurance riders need to adjust their handlebar flare differently than sprinters or climbers? Or does it all come down to the individual riders style and preferences?
Im not looking for any bro-science or anecdotal evidence here - I want to know what the experts have to say. So, bike geeks, lets get into it: do shorter cranks really require adjusting the flare on gravel handlebars, or is this just another myth perpetuated by the bike industry?
I mean, think about it: shorter cranks are supposed to make your bike more comfortable and efficient, but if you dont adjust the handlebar flare, wont that just throw off the whole geometry of the bike? Or does the reduced crank length somehow magically cancel out any potential issues with the handlebars?
And whats the actual impact on the bikes handling? Do shorter cranks make the bike more twitchy or unstable, requiring a wider flare to compensate? Or does the shorter crank length actually make the bike more stable, allowing you to get away with a narrower flare?
Ive seen some people say that the flare needs to be adjusted to maintain the same riding position and comfort level, but others claim that its not necessary at all. So, whos right? Is this just a matter of personal preference, or is there actual science behind it?
And what about the different types of riders out there? Do endurance riders need to adjust their handlebar flare differently than sprinters or climbers? Or does it all come down to the individual riders style and preferences?
Im not looking for any bro-science or anecdotal evidence here - I want to know what the experts have to say. So, bike geeks, lets get into it: do shorter cranks really require adjusting the flare on gravel handlebars, or is this just another myth perpetuated by the bike industry?