Doping in Cycling · Public discussion

Do amateurs dope?

Started by Chazzz801 · · Last activity · 4 posts · 2,103 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Doping in Cycling
Published
3 May 2011
Last activity
18 May 2011
Original author
Chazzz801
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,103
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. ghj

  2. yes they do, just forget about it because you can win clean also,
    if you train consciously during the year + some degree of talent + certain degree of luck, no need for dope.

  3. There's less testing, possibly because of lower budgets, but yet is happens. A local rider here was suspended for 2 years. Pretty much destroyed his hopes of a career.

  4. In my area I have never seen or heard of testing occuring in the lower ranks, mostly because I race and fraternize with riders in the lower ranks. Maybe the 1's and 2's are tested... according to pedals they are, and I would imagine when it happens it's more common at national and regional titles and higher profile races.

    In my local bike shop I was recently chatting with their Shimano rep and he travels to Italy quite a bit. He was telling me some of he local amateurs are stronger than the pros where he was as they are doped to the gills and testing is almost non-existent.

    It's sorry that some people immediately assume you are asking if you should dope, not that you simply have a curiosity whether testing occurs or not. Personally speaking it's none of my business if ya want to dope (but if u find some let me know [IMG]/img/vbsmilies/smilies/wink.gif[/IMG] ).

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.