Professional Cycling · Public discussion

Discovery disbands

Started by snood · · Last activity · 288 posts · 22,844 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Professional Cycling
Published
10 August 2007
Last activity
15 August 2007
Original author
snood
Posts
288
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
22,844
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–60 of 288
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. jonjungel said:

    Gotta be Rabobank. Astana as a distant second candidate.

    Bruyneel @ Rabo... Atleast Gripper will know what teams to target.

    You guys win the prize for the day.

  2. jhuskey said:

    You guys win the prize for the day.

    Is it a trip to Mexico?

  3. Tell us more JHuskey!

  4. Rolfrae said:

    Is it a trip to Mexico?

    Second prize: an all black cycling outfit!

  5. Rolfrae said:

    Is it a trip to Mexico?

    With my neighbor Dolly Parton.

  6. snood said:

    LA Times says so. Discovery Channel cycling team to disband

    It's good news for the sport that those scumbags have disbanded.

    And they can take their takingthepissline.com with 'em.

  7. IH8LANCE said:

    Singling out one team as "scumbags" in this sport is like calling an Irishman a filthy drunk. It's redundant.

    Racist muppet

  8. IH8LANCE said:

    Singling out one team as "scumbags" in this sport is like calling an Irishman a filthy drunk. It's redundant.

    I know what you mean! Although I'd have used a different, less offensive analogy! The question is: Which team will the anti-American cry-babies single out as their whipping boy next? I'm so tired of listening to them I rarely even visit this forum anymore. I just stopped by to see the reaction to Disco disbanding.

    But alas you can rest assured that on this froum you'll still be able to count on any and every thread devolving into an anti-Armstrong/Disco rant. Even though LA has been retired for years and the team deosn't even exist anymore! It'll still happen.

    It's okay for some teams to dope, we'll look the other way, but if you're Disco, we're coming after you with our pitch-forks and torches! 🙄

  9. It is sad that any sponsor leaves, and a team is disbanded. Sponsors are not lining up to sponsor pro cycling these days.
    I wish I had $18 mil. laying around that I could sponsor a team with.
    Not sure I would but I would like to have the $18 mil. laying around 😄

  10. http://eurosport.yahoo.com/10082007/4/end-road-team-armstrong.html

  11. "I do not think you have seen the last of this organisation in the sport but clearly things need to improve on many levels, with a more unified front, before you would see us venture back into cycling," Armstrong said.

  12. Rolfrae said:

    So where are all the riders going to go? George to T-Mob, what about Levis, TD and AC (now that he' announced his purity to the world).

    Brajkovič might go to T-Mobile.

  13. http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/aug07/aug10news3

  14. limerickman said:

    It's good news for the sport that those scumbags have disbanded.

    And they can take their takingthepissline.com with 'em.

    I'm surprised you are not calling for the exit of Rabobank, T-Mobile, etc., teams steeped in doping practices (Rabo is especially corrupt IMO from what I've heard from people who've ridden for them in the past).

    I think that this indicates that sponsors in countries steeped in a cycling doping culture (and therefore taking a more cynical view) think nothing of continuing their sponsorship in the guise of "supporting a new cycling". Of couse, they knowingly supported (and profited) from the "old cycling" for many years.

    The difficulty is in attracting new non-traditional sponsors (i.e. non EU based) to the sport based upon its current problems. Cycling will always be a non-entity as a professional sport in N.A. A reliance on N.A. sponsors was probably not sustainable in the long term given Disco's budget.

    Additionally, Disco choosing to disband could also be in response to the ASO's indication that it would invite who it chooses next year. It could very well be a strategic move.

    In the end, perhaps it ceased to be a good investment, both from a sponsor's and operator's (Tailwind) perspective.

  15. classic1 said:

    Joachim Benoit.

    news.bbc.co.uk972599.stm


    but Classic, was not that when he was at a small team like Vini Coldirola or Aqua Sapone Cantina Tollo first incarnation?

    I think you will find it was a retrospective thing? Not from USPS time. But brought forward the sanction.

    anyway, I knew that, semantics either way, we all know what I was inferring

  16. Rolfrae said:

    I read in a David Miller interview that they had one of the top GC riders in the world practically begging to be on the Slipstream roster next season, wonder who they meant? Probably Lil Tommy D (he's one of the world's best GC riders, right? 🙂)


    LEVI THE LITTLE SNIVLER LEIPHEIMER

  17. limerickman said:

    It's good news for the sport that those scumbags have disbanded.

    And they can take their takingthepissline.com with 'em.

    I agree...... I don't think they had a problem with signing a new sponsor I think they had a problem with what they new sponsor wanted enforce.... ie an internal drug testing policy.... there is no way Bruyneel could have worked under those conditions ! I mean fancy having to be honest....... USPS/Disco put the sport back 10 years......

  18. whiteboytrash said:

    I agree...... I don't think they had a problem with signing a new sponsor I think they had a problem with what they new sponsor wanted enforce.... ie an internal drug testing policy.... there is no way Bruyneel could have worked under those conditions ! I mean fancy having to be honest....... USPS/Disco put the sport back 10 years......

    Even you can't possibly believe the drivel you are writing. T-Mobile, Rabo, and Belgian sponsors, etc., know exactly what's going on. Talk of "new cycling" and team specific "anti-doping" measures are merely PR babble meant to assuage the gullible.

    Wake up WBT. Where is Doctor.House when we need him.

  19. whiteboytrash said:

    I agree...... I don't think they had a problem with signing a new sponsor I think they had a problem with what they new sponsor wanted enforce.... ie an internal drug testing policy.... there is no way Bruyneel could have worked under those conditions ! I mean fancy having to be honest....... USPS/Disco put the sport back 10 years......


    At least Rabo had the balls to fire a couple OG's. And Caisse didn't have the guts to load Valverde up for the Tour.

  20. This is such old news. I knew about this a year ago.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.