Did anyone else hear the bit on the Today program this morning about how Roger Bannister legitamised "cheating" in athletics by his use of pace makers?
Some interesting arguments for and against from Pat Butcher and Seb Coe. I think I side with the "againsts" apart from set time trials.
Did anyone else hear the bit on the Today program this morning about how Roger Bannister legitamised "cheating" in athletics by his use of pace makers?
One thing to consider is that Bannister was basically running the race as a time trial -- the pace makers were not a tactical tool for winning the race, they were a tactical tool for setting a record. There is no way he would have tried this against Landy (it would have played to Landy's strengths) In races, Bannister was quite content to sit back and let the race go slowly then unleash a fast tick about 300m from the finish line. He nearly always ran a slow start and rarely ran even-paced races.