General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Detox Diets

Started by Diane857 · · Last activity · 65 posts · 2,278 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
11 November 2003
Last activity
18 November 2003
Original author
Diane857
Posts
65
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,278
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–60 of 65
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. see below

    Peter Bowditch said:
    (Ilsa9) said:

    "It only takes days to be cured of cancer regardless of the type you have. It
    does not matter how far progressed the cancer is-you can still stop it
    immediately. Does this mean you can cancel your date for surgery, radiation or
    chemotherapy? Yes, after curing your cancer with this recipe, it cannot come
    back. This is not a treatment for cancer: It is a cure!"

    I would like everyone to notice how Hulda Clark does not claim to be
    able to cure cancer. As the words above were written by the woman
    herself I must now agree with her disciple Jan Drew and apologise for
    erroneously saying that Hulda Clark claimed to be able to cure cancer.
    She makes no such claim, as can be seen by her very own words, which I
    will repeat:

    Quoted message said:

    "It only takes days to be cured of cancer regardless of the type you have. It
    does not matter how far progressed the cancer is-you can still stop it
    immediately. Does this mean you can cancel your date for surgery, radiation or
    chemotherapy? Yes, after curing your cancer with this recipe, it cannot come
    back. This is not a treatment for cancer: It is a cure!"

    </sarcasm>

    How do you like them rotten apples, Jan? I await your apology.

    --
    Peter Bowditch
    The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
    The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
    and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
    To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

    Sen~or BOW-ditch (Benji-ditch) Obviously you have NO respect for real healingor GOD's works in the
    NATURAL sense
    much less KNOW anything of value in its' implementation?? It is obvious that this list is DEAD due to
    your
    obvious momentum toward dragging it into an oothouse and thrusting it into the basement thereof. I
    strongly suggest
    that ALL members of same STOP posting immedieately and let PB die via his own ludicrous tantrums.
    B-0b1


  2. Quoted message said:

    It is so improbable given your complete lack of credibility for me to
    even give it much thought. Of course anything is possible which is
    what allows the quacks to prey on the desperation of the hopeless.

    I got it now.
    Mike

  3. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Detox Diets
    From: [email hidden]
    Date: 11/14/2003 4:01 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    @. said:

    On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:28:41 -0600, [email hidden] wrote:

    This is the same razzle dazzle that Rich is famous for, That's why he nuked his
    posts.

    Quite a life he has craved out for himself, I see he is STILL stalking me.

    Poor Rich.

    Jan

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Andrew, If you want to make claims and use anecdotes or extrapolate

    Quoted message said:

    from personal medical understandings, have at it.
    But your claim above about what you know regarding my father with
    Hulda and the other people I saw healed at her clinic has zero
    foundation .

    First of all your claim that people were cured of terminal diseases is
    anecdotal and unverifiable. You could have made it all up for all I
    know. Has a peer reviewed journal EVER published a case of terminal
    cancer being successfully treated by Hulda Clark's methods??

    I have seen many people make many claims but when it comes down to
    verifying any of it I have NEVER EVER seen verification. Just a lot of
    incredible unverifiable claims.

    Yes...Rich.
    That's what I have - personal experiences and anecdotes when it comes
    to Clark's program.

    Yes I could have made it all up, but I didn't. That's where people get
    into conversation about things.

    I glanced at the intense questioning you wrote below.
    It's like a machine gun and I'm supposed to address every single
    little doubt and work hard for what?

    Did I personally investigate EVERY case of terminal cancer?
    Damn man.....I'm asking you to accept something on faith here first
    and that is that this possibility exists. You're starting out that
    everything that comes into this group is impossible. That's safe
    thinking, but rather unreasonable for a group defined as Alternative.

    Do the possibilities you mention completely eliminate what happened
    with these people? Not at all
    Could your possibilities be true? Sure....is it really that likely?
    Not to me.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Peoples' bodies do not spontaneously heal themselves of terminal
    stomach cancer, massive liver tumors or triple brain tumors.

    Oh, really. And you have personally investigated EVERY case of
    terminal cancer to see if ANY have spontaneously healed?? Rarely there
    have been remissions in terminal cancers that no one can explain. It
    may be uncommon but it does occur. I happen to know someone who was
    diagnosed with an incurable cancer and inexplicably she is still alive
    six years later (having been given only months to live). Miracles do
    happen sometime. OTOH maybe the diagnosis was incorrect. Who knows?

    Secondly, as I said previously, other than your claim, there is no
    verifiable evidence that what you say is true. I am quite skeptical.
    And the fact that you continue to support Jan Drew, a pathologic liar,
    makes me wonder about your own credibility. Birds of a feather and all
    that.

    Is there any post you will make that will not have Jan Drew's name in
    it? This is the internet. It doesn't matter to me if you think I'm
    credible or not. If you have any sense you'll assume not and then
    decide if anything is worth investigating.

    There isn't anything I'll take at face value in this group or even
    published on a website.

    People in this group make claims of amazing backgrounds. Doctors come
    in here to argue for hours in a day? The friends I have who are
    doctors are so busy that wasting their lives in here wouldn't leave
    them time to even do gratis work. People come in here to post
    dozens of messages in a day...just in this one NG....retorting to name
    calling? Doesn't that appear pathological?

    Get a grip and if we should happen to post together again, do your
    best to respond without putting Jan Drew in your post.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    The
    people I saw at her clinic were all given up for dead by their
    respective doctors, so these people had chosen the last option they
    believed they had.

    Did you talk to their doctors or see their medical records to see if
    they really had been given up for dead??


    No....I wasn't going to Canada or England or elsewhere in Mexico or to
    hunt down other doctors in the US to prove that these people were
    given terminal prognoses that drove them to Tijuana in the hopes that
    they could spend uncomfortable weeks together. Would you have such
    fortitude to consider that type of research when the reason you
    arrived was to see your father not die?

    I did see X-Rays in succession. The most enjoyable to me was watching
    the 3 masses in that woman's brain slowly disappear.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Your personal education doesn't supercede what all those trusted
    oncologists and medical doctors from the United States, Canada, Mexico
    and England diagnosed with these people.

    Funny that we don't read about these miraculous recoveries in peer
    reviewed journals. The most likely reason why is that they are
    completely bogus.

    It's not funny. You can't wrap yourself around what I told you
    enough to think that just maybe, that just possibly there could be
    something to this. Where's the basis for a peer reviewed journal?
    Those studies don't accept anecdotes, but the people I know who have
    have published are certainly open to discussing them.

    You aren't. Everything unusual is quackery or stupidity until proven
    otherwise. There is a big lesson in that. Take it or leave it.

    Rich, you give up the obvious explain-aways but in the wrong order.
    What you said above is one of the first things people say except,
    those who aren't in medical jobs say "If it were true, then my doctor
    would already know about it." Everyone but you is stupid and
    deceived and everything there is to know on Earth appears in peer
    reviewed journals or comes perfectly prepared for
    misc.health.alternative.

    You say you want proof. It isn't in the form you want and you may have
    to go get it yourself. That's what I did with a few other methods
    I've found tremendously valuable.

    Clark's method is TOUGH. Following her program to get results is one
    of the most disciplined efforts I've personally tried. I did it to
    support my father.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    My father died last year at age 80yo, many years after his original
    surgeon wanted to remove his stomach. At his death he still had his
    stomach and was cancer free.

    Did your father have an autopsy to confirm that he was cancer free??

    Whew! I don't believe you asked me this.
    About 5% of bodies in the US receive autopsies.
    What you also missed, is that years went by from his original terminal
    diagnosis to the point of his passing from an unrelated event. About
    8 years.

    My father had 13 or 14 doctors and eventually 2 surgeons finally
    claimed he was cancer free. I said it was more than 12 because I lost
    count after that. This wasn't a man who was hopping from one doctor
    to the next for a convenient result. The doctors were disagreeing and
    he wanted to have a concrete determination after he left Clark's
    clinic.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    You have a 'picture' of methods that don't resonate with you. I have
    more than a pic from the Net and I understand Clark's work. You can
    post your descriptions from labs and paperwork. I want the real life
    result.

    Most people want real life results. Sadly one cannot rely on
    unverifiable anecdotes by anonymous posters. If one does believe these
    incredible claims then it just goes to prove that a fool is born every
    day.

    Sadly?
    I didn't ask you to put your stamp of approval on Clark's work just
    because I told you some anecdotes from my personal experiences with
    her.

    The only way the average person has to share this information is with
    anecdotes. Reasonable skeptiscm is responsible thinking, but unbelief
    makes you a fool.

    The extreme demand for intense and expensive studies from everyone who
    has something to say is damn laziness on your part.
    You aren't going to get them and you aren't going to change the
    anecdotes.

    I think we would all like the big studies.
    Wait for them and while you're waiting, should you get a diagnosis you
    don't like, then remember the answers you gave to the other question I
    had interest in. What would you do in that case?

    It's at that moment that some people I've met like you, suddenly have
    interest in anecdotes. The anecdotes will still be there. Some will
    be true and some will be false. Throw them all out if you want.
    It's just that at that moment, it's tough to create a Plan B.

    Shaka,

    Mike

    Quoted message said:

    <snip more unverifiable claims>

    Quoted message said:


    Aloha,

    Rich
    ------------------------------------------------
    ------------------------------------------------

    The best defense to logic is ignorance.

  4. (Jan) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Detox Diets
    From: [email hidden]
    Date: 11/14/2003 4:01 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:08:18 GMT, Rich<,@.> wrote:

    Quoted message said:

    Cue Jan to attack me from behind her kill file.

    And then right on cue:

    Quoted message said:

    This is the same razzle dazzle that Rich is famous for, That's why he nuked his
    posts.

    Quite a life he has craved out for himself, I see he is STILL stalking me.

    Jan defines words in a very idiosyncratic way. Jan sees that I am
    stalking her. To Jan mentioning her name is stalking. Lord have mercy.

    Quoted message said:


    Poor Rich.

    Jan says it is NEVER right to belittle.

    Aloha,

    Rich

    Quoted message said:


    Jan

    PS: More gratuitous attacks from Jan to follow. Just watch.

    ------------------------------------------------
    ------------------------------------------------

    The best defense to logic is ignorance.

  5. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Detox Diets
    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 11/14/2003 5:00 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    (Ilsa9) said:

    "It only takes days to be cured of cancer regardless of the type you have.


    It

    Quoted message said:

    does not matter how far progressed the cancer is-you can still stop it
    immediately. Does this mean you can cancel your date for surgery, radiation


    or

    Quoted message said:

    chemotherapy? Yes, after curing your cancer with this recipe, it cannot come
    back. This is not a treatment for cancer: It is a cure!"

    I would like everyone to notice how Hulda Clark does not claim to be
    able to cure cancer. As the words above were written by the woman
    herself I must now agree with her disciple Jan Drew and apologise for
    erroneously saying that Hulda Clark claimed to be able to cure cancer.
    She makes no such claim, as can be seen by her very own words, which I
    will repeat:

    Quoted message said:

    "It only takes days to be cured of cancer regardless of the type you have.


    It

    Quoted message said:

    does not matter how far progressed the cancer is-you can still stop it
    immediately. Does this mean you can cancel your date for surgery, radiation


    or

    Quoted message said:

    chemotherapy? Yes, after curing your cancer with this recipe, it cannot come
    back. This is not a treatment for cancer: It is a cure!"

    Quoted message said:

    </sarcasm>

    How do you like them rotten apples, Jan? I await your apology.

    Memory problems, Peter??

    Good Grief! Everyone knows she says she has a cure for cancer, that is NOT what
    was in question.

    NO WHERE does she say one can be cured by the *zapper*

    Ring a bell?

    HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

    I am not Hulda's disciple and you know it, from my past posts.

    I will NOT let you or anyone continue to lie, and get by with it.

    I am concerned about your memory, or your being mixed up, as your post clearly
    shows.

    Jan


  6. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    From: Jan ([email hidden])
    Subject: Re: Effective liver cleanse?
    View: Complete Thread (163 articles)
    Original Format
    Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
    Date: 2003-07-22 16:34:30 PST

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (Jan) wrote:

    >Alternative practitioners give no 100% cures, and anyone who does is indeed a
    >quack.


    Jan

    (Jan) said:

    Good Grief! Everyone knows she says she has a cure for cancer, that is NOT what
    was in question.

    And now according to Jan everyone knows that Hulda Clark is a quack.

    Aloha,

    Rich
    ------------------------------------------------
    ------------------------------------------------

    The best defense to logic is ignorance.

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    What was the treatment that Hulda Clark used on your father's stomach
    cancer?

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net

    The same that she describes in her books.

    I don't own her books.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  8. see below

    Jan said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Detox Diets
    From: [email hidden]
    Date: 11/14/2003 4:01 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    @. said:

    On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:28:41 -0600, [email hidden] wrote:

    This is the same razzle dazzle that Rich is famous for, That's why he nuked his
    posts.

    Quite a life he has craved out for himself, I see he is STILL stalking me.

    Poor Rich.

    Jan

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Andrew, If you want to make claims and use anecdotes or extrapolate
    >from personal medical understandings, have at it.
    >But your claim above about what you know regarding my father with
    >Hulda and the other people I saw healed at her clinic has zero
    >foundation .

    First of all your claim that people were cured of terminal diseases is
    anecdotal and unverifiable. You could have made it all up for all I
    know. Has a peer reviewed journal EVER published a case of terminal
    cancer being successfully treated by Hulda Clark's methods??

    I have seen many people make many claims but when it comes down to
    verifying any of it I have NEVER EVER seen verification. Just a lot of
    incredible unverifiable claims.

    Yes...Rich.
    That's what I have - personal experiences and anecdotes when it comes
    to Clark's program.

    Yes I could have made it all up, but I didn't. That's where people get
    into conversation about things.

    I glanced at the intense questioning you wrote below.
    It's like a machine gun and I'm supposed to address every single
    little doubt and work hard for what?

    Did I personally investigate EVERY case of terminal cancer?
    Damn man.....I'm asking you to accept something on faith here first
    and that is that this possibility exists. You're starting out that
    everything that comes into this group is impossible. That's safe
    thinking, but rather unreasonable for a group defined as Alternative.

    Do the possibilities you mention completely eliminate what happened
    with these people? Not at all
    Could your possibilities be true? Sure....is it really that likely?
    Not to me.

    Quoted message said:

    >Peoples' bodies do not spontaneously heal themselves of terminal
    >stomach cancer, massive liver tumors or triple brain tumors.

    Oh, really. And you have personally investigated EVERY case of
    terminal cancer to see if ANY have spontaneously healed?? Rarely there
    have been remissions in terminal cancers that no one can explain. It
    may be uncommon but it does occur. I happen to know someone who was
    diagnosed with an incurable cancer and inexplicably she is still alive
    six years later (having been given only months to live). Miracles do
    happen sometime. OTOH maybe the diagnosis was incorrect. Who knows?

    Secondly, as I said previously, other than your claim, there is no
    verifiable evidence that what you say is true. I am quite skeptical.
    And the fact that you continue to support Jan Drew, a pathologic liar,
    makes me wonder about your own credibility. Birds of a feather and all
    that.

    Is there any post you will make that will not have Jan Drew's name in
    it? This is the internet. It doesn't matter to me if you think I'm
    credible or not. If you have any sense you'll assume not and then
    decide if anything is worth investigating.

    There isn't anything I'll take at face value in this group or even
    published on a website.

    People in this group make claims of amazing backgrounds. Doctors come
    in here to argue for hours in a day? The friends I have who are
    doctors are so busy that wasting their lives in here wouldn't leave
    them time to even do gratis work. People come in here to post
    dozens of messages in a day...just in this one NG....retorting to name
    calling? Doesn't that appear pathological?

    Get a grip and if we should happen to post together again, do your
    best to respond without putting Jan Drew in your post.

    Quoted message said:


    > The
    >people I saw at her clinic were all given up for dead by their
    >respective doctors, so these people had chosen the last option they
    >believed they had.

    Did you talk to their doctors or see their medical records to see if
    they really had been given up for dead??


    No....I wasn't going to Canada or England or elsewhere in Mexico or to
    hunt down other doctors in the US to prove that these people were
    given terminal prognoses that drove them to Tijuana in the hopes that
    they could spend uncomfortable weeks together. Would you have such
    fortitude to consider that type of research when the reason you
    arrived was to see your father not die?

    I did see X-Rays in succession. The most enjoyable to me was watching
    the 3 masses in that woman's brain slowly disappear.

    Quoted message said:


    >Your personal education doesn't supercede what all those trusted
    >oncologists and medical doctors from the United States, Canada, Mexico
    >and England diagnosed with these people.

    Funny that we don't read about these miraculous recoveries in peer
    reviewed journals. The most likely reason why is that they are
    completely bogus.

    It's not funny. You can't wrap yourself around what I told you
    enough to think that just maybe, that just possibly there could be
    something to this. Where's the basis for a peer reviewed journal?
    Those studies don't accept anecdotes, but the people I know who have
    have published are certainly open to discussing them.

    You aren't. Everything unusual is quackery or stupidity until proven
    otherwise. There is a big lesson in that. Take it or leave it.

    Rich, you give up the obvious explain-aways but in the wrong order.
    What you said above is one of the first things people say except,
    those who aren't in medical jobs say "If it were true, then my doctor
    would already know about it." Everyone but you is stupid and
    deceived and everything there is to know on Earth appears in peer
    reviewed journals or comes perfectly prepared for
    misc.health.alternative.

    You say you want proof. It isn't in the form you want and you may have
    to go get it yourself. That's what I did with a few other methods
    I've found tremendously valuable.

    Clark's method is TOUGH. Following her program to get results is one
    of the most disciplined efforts I've personally tried. I did it to
    support my father.

    Quoted message said:


    >My father died last year at age 80yo, many years after his original
    >surgeon wanted to remove his stomach. At his death he still had his
    >stomach and was cancer free.

    Did your father have an autopsy to confirm that he was cancer free??

    Whew! I don't believe you asked me this.
    About 5% of bodies in the US receive autopsies.
    What you also missed, is that years went by from his original terminal
    diagnosis to the point of his passing from an unrelated event. About
    8 years.

    My father had 13 or 14 doctors and eventually 2 surgeons finally
    claimed he was cancer free. I said it was more than 12 because I lost
    count after that. This wasn't a man who was hopping from one doctor
    to the next for a convenient result. The doctors were disagreeing and
    he wanted to have a concrete determination after he left Clark's
    clinic.

    Quoted message said:

    >
    >You have a 'picture' of methods that don't resonate with you. I have
    >more than a pic from the Net and I understand Clark's work. You can
    >post your descriptions from labs and paperwork. I want the real life
    >result.

    Most people want real life results. Sadly one cannot rely on
    unverifiable anecdotes by anonymous posters. If one does believe these
    incredible claims then it just goes to prove that a fool is born every
    day.

    Sadly?
    I didn't ask you to put your stamp of approval on Clark's work just
    because I told you some anecdotes from my personal experiences with
    her.

    The only way the average person has to share this information is with
    anecdotes. Reasonable skeptiscm is responsible thinking, but unbelief
    makes you a fool.

    The extreme demand for intense and expensive studies from everyone who
    has something to say is damn laziness on your part.
    You aren't going to get them and you aren't going to change the
    anecdotes.

    I think we would all like the big studies.
    Wait for them and while you're waiting, should you get a diagnosis you
    don't like, then remember the answers you gave to the other question I
    had interest in. What would you do in that case?

    It's at that moment that some people I've met like you, suddenly have
    interest in anecdotes. The anecdotes will still be there. Some will
    be true and some will be false. Throw them all out if you want.
    It's just that at that moment, it's tough to create a Plan B.

    Shaka,

    Mike

    Quoted message said:

    <snip more unverifiable claims>

    Quoted message said:


    Aloha,

    Rich
    ------------------------------------------------
    ------------------------------------------------

    The best defense to logic is ignorance.

    SHAKA..IF you want verification that I am YOUNGER from my OWN products..I'll


    GIVE you a yrs supply FREE!

    Quoted message said:

    all you pay is shipping of a usual 90 dollar kit that I'll teach you to use


    PLUS give you names of users that have

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    experienced age reversals and incredible health from same! There ARE


    miracles in this world..believe it or NOT!! B-0b1

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
  9. Just ignore them they are out to destroy alt med.
    When I was critical about polio eradication and assumptions - they resorted
    to assumptions. Shows their bias.
    What they are really saying is that you are not entitled to your definition
    of things because it hasn't been proven via well designed trials.
    Anth

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    @. said:
    Quoted message said:

    Andrew, If you want to make claims and use anecdotes or extrapolate
    from personal medical understandings, have at it.
    But your claim above about what you know regarding my father with
    Hulda and the other people I saw healed at her clinic has zero
    foundation .

    First of all your claim that people were cured of terminal diseases is
    anecdotal and unverifiable. You could have made it all up for all I
    know. Has a peer reviewed journal EVER published a case of terminal
    cancer being successfully treated by Hulda Clark's methods??

    I have seen many people make many claims but when it comes down to
    verifying any of it I have NEVER EVER seen verification. Just a lot of
    incredible unverifiable claims.

    Yes...Rich.
    That's what I have - personal experiences and anecdotes when it comes
    to Clark's program.

    Yes I could have made it all up, but I didn't. That's where people get
    into conversation about things.

    I glanced at the intense questioning you wrote below.
    It's like a machine gun and I'm supposed to address every single
    little doubt and work hard for what?

    Did I personally investigate EVERY case of terminal cancer?
    Damn man.....I'm asking you to accept something on faith here first
    and that is that this possibility exists. You're starting out that
    everything that comes into this group is impossible. That's safe
    thinking, but rather unreasonable for a group defined as Alternative.

    Do the possibilities you mention completely eliminate what happened
    with these people? Not at all
    Could your possibilities be true? Sure....is it really that likely?
    Not to me.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Peoples' bodies do not spontaneously heal themselves of terminal
    stomach cancer, massive liver tumors or triple brain tumors.

    Oh, really. And you have personally investigated EVERY case of
    terminal cancer to see if ANY have spontaneously healed?? Rarely there
    have been remissions in terminal cancers that no one can explain. It
    may be uncommon but it does occur. I happen to know someone who was
    diagnosed with an incurable cancer and inexplicably she is still alive
    six years later (having been given only months to live). Miracles do
    happen sometime. OTOH maybe the diagnosis was incorrect. Who knows?

    Secondly, as I said previously, other than your claim, there is no
    verifiable evidence that what you say is true. I am quite skeptical.
    And the fact that you continue to support Jan Drew, a pathologic liar,
    makes me wonder about your own credibility. Birds of a feather and all
    that.

    Is there any post you will make that will not have Jan Drew's name in
    it? This is the internet. It doesn't matter to me if you think I'm
    credible or not. If you have any sense you'll assume not and then
    decide if anything is worth investigating.

    There isn't anything I'll take at face value in this group or even
    published on a website.

    People in this group make claims of amazing backgrounds. Doctors come
    in here to argue for hours in a day? The friends I have who are
    doctors are so busy that wasting their lives in here wouldn't leave
    them time to even do gratis work. People come in here to post
    dozens of messages in a day...just in this one NG....retorting to name
    calling? Doesn't that appear pathological?

    Get a grip and if we should happen to post together again, do your
    best to respond without putting Jan Drew in your post.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    The
    people I saw at her clinic were all given up for dead by their
    respective doctors, so these people had chosen the last option they
    believed they had.

    Did you talk to their doctors or see their medical records to see if
    they really had been given up for dead??


    No....I wasn't going to Canada or England or elsewhere in Mexico or to
    hunt down other doctors in the US to prove that these people were
    given terminal prognoses that drove them to Tijuana in the hopes that
    they could spend uncomfortable weeks together. Would you have such
    fortitude to consider that type of research when the reason you
    arrived was to see your father not die?

    I did see X-Rays in succession. The most enjoyable to me was watching
    the 3 masses in that woman's brain slowly disappear.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Your personal education doesn't supercede what all those trusted
    oncologists and medical doctors from the United States, Canada, Mexico
    and England diagnosed with these people.

    Funny that we don't read about these miraculous recoveries in peer
    reviewed journals. The most likely reason why is that they are
    completely bogus.

    It's not funny. You can't wrap yourself around what I told you
    enough to think that just maybe, that just possibly there could be
    something to this. Where's the basis for a peer reviewed journal?
    Those studies don't accept anecdotes, but the people I know who have
    have published are certainly open to discussing them.

    You aren't. Everything unusual is quackery or stupidity until proven
    otherwise. There is a big lesson in that. Take it or leave it.

    Rich, you give up the obvious explain-aways but in the wrong order.
    What you said above is one of the first things people say except,
    those who aren't in medical jobs say "If it were true, then my doctor
    would already know about it." Everyone but you is stupid and
    deceived and everything there is to know on Earth appears in peer
    reviewed journals or comes perfectly prepared for
    misc.health.alternative.

    You say you want proof. It isn't in the form you want and you may have
    to go get it yourself. That's what I did with a few other methods
    I've found tremendously valuable.

    Clark's method is TOUGH. Following her program to get results is one
    of the most disciplined efforts I've personally tried. I did it to
    support my father.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    My father died last year at age 80yo, many years after his original
    surgeon wanted to remove his stomach. At his death he still had his
    stomach and was cancer free.

    Did your father have an autopsy to confirm that he was cancer free??

    Whew! I don't believe you asked me this.
    About 5% of bodies in the US receive autopsies.
    What you also missed, is that years went by from his original terminal
    diagnosis to the point of his passing from an unrelated event. About
    8 years.

    My father had 13 or 14 doctors and eventually 2 surgeons finally
    claimed he was cancer free. I said it was more than 12 because I lost
    count after that. This wasn't a man who was hopping from one doctor
    to the next for a convenient result. The doctors were disagreeing and
    he wanted to have a concrete determination after he left Clark's
    clinic.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    You have a 'picture' of methods that don't resonate with you. I have
    more than a pic from the Net and I understand Clark's work. You can
    post your descriptions from labs and paperwork. I want the real life
    result.

    Most people want real life results. Sadly one cannot rely on
    unverifiable anecdotes by anonymous posters. If one does believe these
    incredible claims then it just goes to prove that a fool is born every
    day.

    Sadly?
    I didn't ask you to put your stamp of approval on Clark's work just
    because I told you some anecdotes from my personal experiences with
    her.

    The only way the average person has to share this information is with
    anecdotes. Reasonable skeptiscm is responsible thinking, but unbelief
    makes you a fool.

    The extreme demand for intense and expensive studies from everyone who
    has something to say is damn laziness on your part.
    You aren't going to get them and you aren't going to change the
    anecdotes.

    I think we would all like the big studies.
    Wait for them and while you're waiting, should you get a diagnosis you
    don't like, then remember the answers you gave to the other question I
    had interest in. What would you do in that case?

    It's at that moment that some people I've met like you, suddenly have
    interest in anecdotes. The anecdotes will still be there. Some will
    be true and some will be false. Throw them all out if you want.
    It's just that at that moment, it's tough to create a Plan B.

    Shaka,

    Mike

    Quoted message said:

    <snip more unverifiable claims>

    Quoted message said:


    Aloha,

    Rich
    ------------------------------------------------
    ------------------------------------------------

    The best defense to logic is ignorance.


  10. Rich said:
    (Jan) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Detox Diets
    From: [email hidden]
    Date: 11/14/2003 4:01 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:08:18 GMT, Rich<,@.> wrote:

    Quoted message said:

    Cue Jan to attack me from behind her kill file.

    And then right on cue:

    Quoted message said:

    This is the same razzle dazzle that Rich is famous for, That's why he nuked his
    posts.

    Quite a life he has craved out for himself, I see he is STILL stalking me.

    Jan defines words in a very idiosyncratic way. Jan sees that I am
    stalking her. To Jan mentioning her name is stalking. Lord have mercy.

    Quoted message said:


    Poor Rich.

    Jan says it is NEVER right to belittle.

    Aloha,

    Rich

    Quoted message said:


    Jan

    PS: More gratuitous attacks from Jan to follow. Just watch

    GO gett'im JAN!!! B-0b1

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ------------------------------------------------
    ------------------------------------------------

    The best defense to logic is ignorance.

  11. see below

    Jan said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Detox Diets
    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 11/14/2003 5:00 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    (Ilsa9) said:

    "It only takes days to be cured of cancer regardless of the type you have.


    It

    Quoted message said:

    does not matter how far progressed the cancer is-you can still stop it
    immediately. Does this mean you can cancel your date for surgery, radiation


    or

    Quoted message said:

    chemotherapy? Yes, after curing your cancer with this recipe, it cannot come
    back. This is not a treatment for cancer: It is a cure!"

    I would like everyone to notice how Hulda Clark does not claim to be
    able to cure cancer. As the words above were written by the woman
    herself I must now agree with her disciple Jan Drew and apologise for
    erroneously saying that Hulda Clark claimed to be able to cure cancer.
    She makes no such claim, as can be seen by her very own words, which I
    will repeat:

    Quoted message said:

    "It only takes days to be cured of cancer regardless of the type you have.


    It

    Quoted message said:

    does not matter how far progressed the cancer is-you can still stop it
    immediately. Does this mean you can cancel your date for surgery, radiation


    or

    Quoted message said:

    chemotherapy? Yes, after curing your cancer with this recipe, it cannot come
    back. This is not a treatment for cancer: It is a cure!"

    Quoted message said:

    </sarcasm>

    How do you like them rotten apples, Jan? I await your apology.

    Memory problems, Peter??

    Good Grief! Everyone knows she says she has a cure for cancer, that is NOT what
    was in question.

    NO WHERE does she say one can be cured by the *zapper*

    Ring a bell?

    HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

    I am not Hulda's disciple and you know it, from my past posts.

    I will NOT let you or anyone continue to lie, and get by with it.

    I am concerned about your memory, or your being mixed up, as your post clearly
    shows.

    Jan

    Hey folks...HULDA is ALMOST right!! The QUICK part may be an exaggeration
    but the METHODS are sound as they are the same as I practice...but I KNOw
    better than to
    brag and say "immediatley"...Maybe a year or so..but NOT NOW right
    away...even a pimple
    takes a few days to go away...LOL! B-0b1

  12. David Wright said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    What was the treatment that Hulda Clark used on your father's stomach
    cancer?

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net

    The same that she describes in her books.

    I don't own her books.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

    Any cancer may be put into REMISSION in a few days but
    to CURE and get it OUT of the body completely takes other methods.
    The MAJICK CRYSTALS literally EAT the bad tissues and regenerate
    their DNA immediatley I have seen a NEW kidney being generated in
    a petri dish inside of an hour.

    YES: IMMEDIATELY IN SECONDS???? is indeed
    Devoutly to be wished but close! The method BTW is out-lawed in
    the USA
    even though it was discovered here by a male physicist...but only 5
    countries
    including MEXICO use the method. Even SPAIN sees its miracle! But
    HERE??
    NOPE..our ALLOPATHIC skulldugery wont allow it legally! They do NOT
    believe in almost instant repair of dameged tissue.

    This reminds me of a JOKE
    where a man while hunting with his friend was bitten on the penis by
    a rattle snake
    while relievng himself. The man bitten writhed in pain and told his
    companon to go find
    a doctor...the doctor told him he's be there as soon as
    possible...but in the meantime he
    should suck out the poison from the wounded penis. When the man
    returned the injured
    person and he asked him: "what did the doctor say...huh Whad-he
    say?? The man who 'd
    just returned retorted; "You gonna DIE Boy"!!!

    B-0b1

  13. "Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Just ignore them they are out to destroy alt med.
    When I was critical about polio eradication and assumptions - they


    resorted

    Quoted message said:

    to assumptions. Shows their bias.
    What they are really saying is that you are not entitled to your


    definition

    Quoted message said:

    of things because it hasn't been proven via well designed trials.
    Anth

    No, Anth. When you postulated incorrectly that polio vaccination can be
    halted in countries where the incidence of wild polio has dropped to zero,
    because it was possible to do that during the eradication of smallpox, we
    pointed out the factual reasons why this is not so. There were no
    assumptions except the simplistic ones on your part. You are indeed entitled
    to your "definition of things," but if you baldly make declarations of
    "fact" that are false, you must expect to be called on them. If every
    statement is taken at face value, then no statement has any value at all.

    --Rich

  14. "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    I will NOT let you or anyone continue to lie, and get by with it.

    Jan

    $ KaChing $24

  15. "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    ...plus he is a known liar.

    Jan

    $ KaChing $26

  16. No
    I quoted that the incidence of polio was decreasing in other countries at
    the time of the peak in the usa.
    It is you who are assuming on the basis of vaccine.
    Anth

    "Rich Shewmaker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Just ignore them they are out to destroy alt med.
    When I was critical about polio eradication and assumptions - they


    resorted

    Quoted message said:

    to assumptions. Shows their bias.
    What they are really saying is that you are not entitled to your


    definition

    Quoted message said:

    of things because it hasn't been proven via well designed trials.
    Anth

    No, Anth. When you postulated incorrectly that polio vaccination can be
    halted in countries where the incidence of wild polio has dropped to zero,
    because it was possible to do that during the eradication of smallpox, we
    pointed out the factual reasons why this is not so. There were no
    assumptions except the simplistic ones on your part. You are indeed


    entitled

    Quoted message said:

    to your "definition of things," but if you baldly make declarations of
    "fact" that are false, you must expect to be called on them. If every
    statement is taken at face value, then no statement has any value at all.

    --Rich

  17. see below

    David Wright said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    What was the treatment that Hulda Clark used on your father's stomach
    cancer?

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net

    The same that she describes in her books.

    I don't own her books.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

    A bit OFF subject fro the above...but HEbAL Sciencs ( God's Science)
    is great for a natural Herbal mix made into nose drops. If anyone who
    really is interested
    wants the simple recipe for an adequate and working herbal mix for
    same..I have developed it
    over the past ten years. It works well for me and a few others with
    which I've shared it . B-0b1

  18. see below

    Anth said:

    No
    I quoted that the incidence of polio was decreasing in other countries at
    the time of the peak in the usa.
    It is you who are assuming on the basis of vaccine.
    Anth

    "Rich Shewmaker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Just ignore them they are out to destroy alt med.
    When I was critical about polio eradication and assumptions - they


    resorted

    Quoted message said:

    to assumptions. Shows their bias.
    What they are really saying is that you are not entitled to your


    definition

    Quoted message said:

    of things because it hasn't been proven via well designed trials.
    Anth

    No, Anth. When you postulated incorrectly that polio vaccination can be
    halted in countries where the incidence of wild polio has dropped to zero,
    because it was possible to do that during the eradication of smallpox, we
    pointed out the factual reasons why this is not so. There were no
    assumptions except the simplistic ones on your part. You are indeed


    entitled

    Quoted message said:

    to your "definition of things," but if you baldly make declarations of
    "fact" that are false, you must expect to be called on them. If every
    statement is taken at face value, then no statement has any value at all.

    --Rich

    RICH...Anti-toxins exist in the oils of fruit seeds and often in the


    oils of such

    Quoted message said:

    items as avocados as well. They are put to usue by wonderful


    health-item

    Quoted message said:

    manuacurers such as "NOW" (brand) and others. I buy about 7 different


    kinds

    Quoted message said:

    for making and selling ( at cost plus shipping only) an anti oxident


    that seems to work

    Quoted message said:

    well for menopaausal problems especially as well as AGING effects for


    all 5 sexes. (LOL)

    Quoted message said:

    It is also an adjunct to "age reversal" as well...the most popular


    subject of present USE

    Quoted message said:

    net palaver. Anyone can make it for themselves with proper set-ups and


    equipment!

    Quoted message said:

    These KITS are also available at cost ( plus shipping) NO PROFITS


    made. I do NOT believe

    Quoted message said:

    I should profit from something GOD has shown me and has daily helped


    me RE-discover

    Quoted message said:

    from an ancient chemistry that has been around for MANY


    milleniae..probably first developed in

    Quoted message said:

    the Far East??? E-mail me for questions?? B-0b1

  19. Quoted message said:

    Just ignore them they are out to destroy alt med.

    Do you _Really_ believe that?

    Quoted message said:

    When I was critical about polio eradication and assumptions - they resorted
    to assumptions. Shows their bias.

    Bias, eh?

    Quoted message said:

    What they are really saying is that you are not entitled to your definition
    of things because it hasn't been proven via well designed trials.

    No, what they are saying is that you are NOT entitled to your definition of
    terms. You have to accept them and the historical data as givens. You don't
    get to alter them to suit your desired belief d'jour.

    Science is about truth, not about propping up a belief system.

    Quoted message said:

    Anth

  20. err yes?
    Anth

    "B-Ob1" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    see below

    Anth said:

    No
    I quoted that the incidence of polio was decreasing in other countries


    at

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the time of the peak in the usa.
    It is you who are assuming on the basis of vaccine.
    Anth

    "Rich Shewmaker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > Just ignore them they are out to destroy alt med.
    > When I was critical about polio eradication and assumptions - they
    resorted
    > to assumptions. Shows their bias.
    > What they are really saying is that you are not entitled to your
    definition
    > of things because it hasn't been proven via well designed trials.
    > Anth

    No, Anth. When you postulated incorrectly that polio vaccination can


    be

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    halted in countries where the incidence of wild polio has dropped to


    zero,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    because it was possible to do that during the eradication of smallpox,


    we

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    pointed out the factual reasons why this is not so. There were no
    assumptions except the simplistic ones on your part. You are indeed


    entitled

    Quoted message said:

    to your "definition of things," but if you baldly make declarations of
    "fact" that are false, you must expect to be called on them. If every
    statement is taken at face value, then no statement has any value at


    all.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    --Rich

    RICH...Anti-toxins exist in the oils of fruit seeds and often in


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    oils of such

    Quoted message said:

    items as avocados as well. They are put to usue by wonderful


    health-item

    Quoted message said:

    manuacurers such as "NOW" (brand) and others. I buy about 7


    different

    Quoted message said:

    kinds

    Quoted message said:

    for making and selling ( at cost plus shipping only) an anti


    oxident

    Quoted message said:

    that seems to work

    Quoted message said:

    well for menopaausal problems especially as well as AGING


    effects for

    Quoted message said:

    all 5 sexes. (LOL)

    Quoted message said:

    It is also an adjunct to "age reversal" as well...the most


    popular

    Quoted message said:

    subject of present USE

    Quoted message said:

    net palaver. Anyone can make it for themselves with proper


    set-ups and

    Quoted message said:

    equipment!

    Quoted message said:

    These KITS are also available at cost ( plus shipping) NO


    PROFITS

    Quoted message said:

    made. I do NOT believe

    Quoted message said:

    I should profit from something GOD has shown me and has daily


    helped

    Quoted message said:

    me RE-discover

    Quoted message said:

    from an ancient chemistry that has been around for MANY


    milleniae..probably first developed in

    Quoted message said:

    the Far East??? E-mail me for questions?? B-0b1

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.