Is it time to rethink the traditional cycling dogma that equates bigger muscles with slower speeds, or would a focus on hypertrophy training actually lead to increased power output and endurance for road cyclists, potentially bridging the gap between the über-efficient, yet fragile, whippet-thin roadie physique and the muscular, wattage-producing machine of a track cyclist?
Would prioritizing hypertrophy training allow road cyclists to tap into the same muscular reserves that enable track cyclists to generate massive amounts of power over short distances, even if it means sacrificing a fraction of a percent of aerodynamic efficiency in the process, or would the added muscle mass simply become dead weight on the climbs and in breakaways?
And can the oft-cited interference effect – which suggests that concurrent strength training can actually decrease endurance performance by altering muscle fiber recruitment patterns – be mitigated or even reversed through careful periodization and programming of hypertrophy training, potentially leading to a net gain in overall cycling performance?
Would prioritizing hypertrophy training allow road cyclists to tap into the same muscular reserves that enable track cyclists to generate massive amounts of power over short distances, even if it means sacrificing a fraction of a percent of aerodynamic efficiency in the process, or would the added muscle mass simply become dead weight on the climbs and in breakaways?
And can the oft-cited interference effect – which suggests that concurrent strength training can actually decrease endurance performance by altering muscle fiber recruitment patterns – be mitigated or even reversed through careful periodization and programming of hypertrophy training, potentially leading to a net gain in overall cycling performance?