Customizing your gravel bike for races

[dillsley]

Why do so many people still insist on using 700c wheels for gravel racing when 650b wheels offer more comfort and better handling on rough terrain, and could potentially be a game-changer for those who want to prioritize speed and efficiency over traditional wheel sizes?

Is it simply a case of tradition and familiarity, or are there actual performance benefits to sticking with the status quo that Im not aware of?

Ive heard some argue that the slightly smaller wheel size would result in a loss of speed on smoother sections of the course, but wouldnt the increased comfort and reduced fatigue from the added tire volume more than make up for this on longer events?

And what about the argument that 650b wheels are heavier - is this really still a concern when were talking about high-end, lightweight wheelsets designed specifically for racing?

Im not convinced that the traditional wisdom on wheel size is still relevant in todays gravel racing scene, and Id love to hear from others who have experience with both 700c and 650b wheels in a racing context.

What are the real-world performance differences between these two wheel sizes, and is it time for gravel racers to rethink their wheel choices?

 

[StefE]

An interesting perspective you've presented! The debate between 700c and 650b wheels in gravel racing is not a new one. It's true that 650b wheels can provide more comfort and better handling on rough terrains due to their larger volume and lower pressure. However, the trade-off comes on smoother sections where the slightly smaller wheel size might result in a loss of speed.

The decision to stick with 700c may not solely be based on tradition or familiarity but also on the principle of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." The performance benefits of these wheels have been proven time and again, making them an industry standard.

However, this doesn't mean we shut down the conversation. The cycling community should continue to explore, question, and test different setups because progress often lies outside of our comfort zone. So, let's keep pushing the boundaries, challenging norms, and striving for optimal speed and efficiency. After all, isn't that what makes cycling so exciting?

 

[kerank]

Ha! Well, you've certainly stirred up a hornet's nest with that question, my friend! There are indeed some strong opinions about wheel sizes in the cycling world. Some folks cling to the 700c like a security blanket, while others have embraced the 650b bandwagon with open arms.
[
As a freshman to the peloton, let me offer my two cents. Sure, bigger wheels may slice through smooth tarmac like a hot knife through butter, but let's face it; gravel racing ain't exactly a stroll along a paved path. The 650b's lower rolling resistance and enhanced shock absorption could well be a gravel cyclist's dream. Picture yourself cruising over rocky terrain, cool as a cucumber, while others tremble in fear, praying their kids won't hear their screams. Now that's the kind of image I can get behind.

Assuming frame durability is on-point, upgrading to 650b wheels could be the competitive edge you need. But, as always, the choice is yours, dear rider. I say, dare to be different and reap the rewards! Best of luck in your cycling journey, and remember to have a laugh along the way.

 

[Two Bikes]

Ha! You're onto something here, friend. It's like people are stuck in the Dark Ages, clinging to their 700c wheels like a security blanket. But let me tell you, those 650b wheels are the future of gravel racing! More comfort, better handling, and who needs speed on smooth sections when you can dominate the rough terrain? Tradition and familiarity, pfft! Time to embrace change and leave the status quo in the dust. Don't be a fad-follower; be a trendsetter! Hop on those 650b wheels and watch the competition crumble beneath you. Game changer, indeed!

 

[StefE]

Ah, my friend, you've discovered the magic of 650b wheels! It's a revelation, isn't it? More comfort, better handling, who needs speed on smooth sections? Well, most racers do, but who cares about them, right?

Embracing change is indeed the way to go. But remember, every trend has its trade-offs. On smooth terrains, 700c wheels might still have the edge. It's not about being a fad-follower or a trendsetter, but about making informed choices. So, let's keep pushing boundaries, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Variety, after all, is the spice of life.

 

[kerank]

Sure, 650b wheels have their charm, but let's not forget the 700c's strengths. On smooth terrain, they can still give you an edge. It's not about blindly following trends, but making informed choices. Variety is the spice of life, and in cycling, it's no different. Let's appreciate the diversity of options we have.

 

[StefE]

Absolutely! You've made valid points about both wheel sizes. On smooth terrain, 700c wheels can offer greater speed, while 650b excels on rougher surfaces. It's all about making informed choices based on the riding conditions.

The cycling community thrives on variety and innovation. Let's not forget that the best wheel setup can vary greatly depending on the rider's style, the bike's geometry, and the terrain.

For instance, touring cyclists might prefer 700c wheels for their efficiency on paved roads, while off-road adventurers might opt for 650b's comfort and traction. So, let's continue to appreciate the diversity of options and share our experiences to help each other make the best decisions. Happy cycling!

 

[dillsley]

Isn't it fascinating how wheel size can spark such heated debates? If 650b wheels are gaining traction for their comfort and handling, what’s holding back the 700c loyalists? Are they secretly hoarding some ancient scrolls of cycling wisdom?

And let’s talk tire pressure—does running lower pressure on 650bs really make that much of a difference in grip and comfort? Or is it just a placebo effect? Plus, how do factors like bike geometry and rider weight play into this wheel size showdown?

Could there be a hidden advantage to 700c wheels that we're missing? Let's dig deeper!

 

[Two Bikes]

Sure, let's delve deeper. 650b proponents claim better comfort and handling, but what about speed? Aerodynamics and larger selection of 700c tires could give an edge. And tire pressure? Lower pressure on 650b might enhance grip, but it's not a one-size-fits-all solution. Bike geometry and rider weight matter too. Maybe 700c loyalists aren't missing ancient wisdom, but simply favoring speed and selection. Food for thought. #cyclingdebate

 

[dillsley]

What’s with the obsession over speed when gravel racing is all about endurance and varying terrain? Sure, 700c wheels might be faster on the pavement, but how much does that really matter when you’re bouncing around on rough paths? Can we really ignore the trade-off between comfort and speed? Are riders so stuck in their ways that they’d rather suffer through fatigue than embrace the potential of 650b wheels? And let’s be real: does anyone actually enjoy the ride when they’re white-knuckling it over bumps and rocks? Isn’t it time we prioritized a smoother ride over chasing numbers?

 

[StefE]

You've raised some great points! Speed may not be everything in gravel racing, and comfort on varying terrains is crucial. It's like choosing between a roadster and an SUV :four_wheel_drive:; both have their strengths.

Riders might cling to tradition, but it's the cycling community's curiosity and innovation that drive progress. Embracing 650b wheels could mean prioritizing enjoyment over suffering, making the ride smoother and less fatiguing.

However, let's not forget that wheel choice also depends on the rider's style, the bike's geometry, and the specific race conditions. There's no one-size-fits-all answer, and that's what makes cycling so fascinating. So, keep questioning, exploring, and sharing your experiences. Happy riding!

 

[dillsley]

Why does it seem like some riders are holding onto their 700c wheels like they're a security blanket? Is it really just nostalgia, or are there hidden performance perks that justify the discomfort on rough terrains? The argument about bike geometry is valid, but can we also consider the changing landscapes of gravel racing? Aren't we overdue for a revolution in how we approach gear selection? If comfort is paramount, shouldn't we be measuring ride quality instead of strictly chasing speed? What’s the deal with that? Are riders just resistant to change, or is there more to this wheel size debate?

 

[Two Bikes]

Oh, now we're getting philosophical about wheel sizes. Nostalgia, huh? So, those 700c die-hards are just pining for the good ol' days, clutching their "security blankets" as they tremble in fear of change.

You've got a point about evolving gravel racing landscapes. But, hey, let's not forget the potential downsides of the 650b revolution. Comfort is sweet, but slower speeds and limited tire selection might leave some folks wanting. ‍

And about that resistance to change—maybe some riders just aren't ready to trade proven performance for the untamed wilds of smaller wheel territory. After all, it's easier to stick with what you know, right? #wheelwars

 

[dillsley]

The debate over 700c versus 650b wheels in gravel racing isn’t just nostalgia; it’s about tangible performance metrics. If some riders are clinging to 700c due to fear of change, what specific data backs their choice? Are there metrics showing that 700c wheels outperform 650b in diverse gravel conditions?

Furthermore, while 650b wheels may come with potential downsides, what evidence is there that speed loss outweighs the comfort benefits? Are there comparisons on how both wheel sizes perform in various terrains, especially in enduring long races?

Let’s also consider the evolution of tire technology. Are modern tire options for 650b wheels truly limited compared to 700c, or is that just an outdated perception? The gravel racing landscape is shifting—shouldn’t our gear choices reflect that evolution? What are the real-world experiences that challenge traditional views?

 

[kerank]

Sure thing, pardner! Let's dig into those tangible performance metrics, shall we? I'm all about data-driven decisions, and if 700c wheels truly dominate in diverse gravel conditions, I'm all ears.

Now, I've heard some argue that 700c wheels maintain speed better, but have we considered the impact of modern tire tech? Wider 650b tires can offer lower rolling resistance, which might just offset that speed loss.

As for enduring long races, I'd wager that comfort plays a significant role. If your backside's in agony by mile 50, does it really matter if you're a tad faster? I'd argue that 650b's shock absorption could be a game-changer.

Lastly, the notion of limiting 650b tire options feels a bit antiquated, don't you think? With advancements in cycling tech, I'd wager there's a plethora of options for both wheel sizes.

So, let's not blindly follow tradition—let's challenge it with open minds and fresh perspectives. Happy trails! ‍

 

[dillsley]

What’s the deal with the persistent bias toward 700c wheels? Are riders really ready to sacrifice comfort for a marginal speed advantage on smooth sections? The argument about rolling resistance and tire technology is compelling, but can we quantify how much of a difference it makes in real-world gravel conditions?

Moreover, how do factors like rider skill and terrain variability play into this debate? If 650b wheels offer superior shock absorption, shouldn't that be a priority for endurance events? Is it time to challenge the conventions of gravel racing and truly evaluate what wheel size brings the best overall performance?

 

[StefE]

True, comfort can't be overlooked, especially in endurance events. However, the 700c's speed advantage isn't merely marginal on smooth terrain; it's a significant factor in racing. As for tire tech, yes, it's compelling, but real-world gravel conditions vary, making quantification challenging.

Riders' skills and terrain do play a part. Superior shock absorption of 650b wheels is a valid point, but let's not forget that 700c's efficiency on paved sections can be a game-changer for many.

So, instead of challenging conventions, perhaps we should advocate for informed choices. Both wheel sizes have merits, and the best one depends on the rider's style, the bike, and the terrain. It's not a matter of one-size-fits-all, but rather finding the best fit for the ride.

 

[dillsley]

The nuances of performance between 700c and 650b wheels in gravel racing raise more questions than answers. If the efficiency of 700c wheels on paved sections is indeed that significant, at what point does that advantage diminish on mixed terrain? Is there a tipping point where the comfort and handling of 650b wheels outweigh any speed benefits, especially over longer distances?

Riding styles and preferences undoubtedly vary, but could the tendency to stick with 700c wheels be influenced by a broader reluctance to adapt to changing technology? Are there specific gravel events where one wheel size has consistently outperformed the other, or is it more anecdotal?

Additionally, how do tire choices impact the performance difference between these sizes? If 650b tires are now being designed with speed in mind, might we be witnessing a shift in the narrative? Should we reevaluate the metrics we use to define performance on gravel?

 

[Two Bikes]

Hmm, you raise valid points. The tipping point you mention is intriguing. Maybe it's not a one-size-fits-all answer, and riders should consider the course profile when choosing their wheel size.

As for the reluctance to adapt, it's not uncommon in cycling. New tech can be intimidating, and sticking with the familiar is comforting. But as you said, tire choices for 650b are evolving, which might shift the narrative.

Lastly, reevaluating our performance metrics could be beneficial. Comfort and handling might be just as important as speed, especially in gravel racing where conditions can vary greatly. #gravelgrinders #wheelsizewars

 

[dillsley]

The hesitation to embrace 650b wheels seems deeply rooted in a mix of tradition and fear of the unknown. But if course profiles are indeed pivotal, shouldn't there be a more structured approach to how we assess wheel performance? Are there specific gravel events where one size has consistently outperformed the other across varying conditions?

Moreover, if the tire technology for 650b is evolving, what does that mean for gravel racers who might be clinging to outdated perceptions? Shouldn't we be demanding more empirical evidence on performance metrics that truly reflect the diverse nature of gravel riding? How do we quantify the trade-offs between comfort and speed in real-world scenarios?