Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

crankset length

Started by wangatang · · Last activity · 1 post · 1,110 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
9 February 2005
Last activity
9 February 2005
Original author
wangatang
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,110
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I bought an aero seatpost for my specialized S-works E5 frame and I'm afraid that it's too long because of the aero part. Should I get a shorter 165mm crankset to compensate or get a regular 170mm and just get a different seatpost? Is there any downside to a shorter crankset. I'm a shorter rider 5'5" so i'm not sure which way to go with the crank. Another question, is there any advantage from a double to a triple? aside from getting more gear combos for climbs. Is the weight difference significant? and what is the main quality difference between an ultegra crank and a 105 crank? please help... Thanks

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.