Road Cycling · Public discussion

Consumer Reports rates some bikes

Started by Tom Parker · · Last activity · 3 posts · 6,244 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
9 May 2003
Last activity
10 May 2003
Original author
Tom Parker
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
6,244
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The latest issue of Consumer Reports (June) just arrived, and they have a small article rating
    bikes, for 3 categories of riders: comfort, fitness, and road. The top-rated bikes were by Giant,
    Giant, and Bianchi, respectively. They didn't care much for the two comfort bikes with automatic
    shift. FYI.

    -- Tom

  2. "Tom Parker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The latest issue of Consumer Reports (June) just arrived, and they have a small article rating
    bikes, for 3 categories of riders: comfort, fitness, and road. The top-rated bikes were by Giant,
    Giant, and Bianchi, respectively. They didn't care much for the two comfort bikes with automatic
    shift. FYI.

    I was mostly impressed with the quality of the general advice they gave about bike-buying. It isn't
    comprehensive or complete, but it's mostly at least not wrong. They make the case that buying at a
    local bike shop is the best strategy. And they didn't include any mountain bikes, for once.

    But the test reports are ludicrous. For one thing, they make no mention of the basic reality that
    what they tested is about 1% of what's actually available. Entire major brands are omitted
    entirely. Nothing is said about the brandmates of the bikes they did test. And while the issue of
    fit is mentioned in the text, the connection is not made to the "ratings." The uninitiated buyer
    who wants the "top rated" bike may have trouble understanding why it's not suitable for their
    particular physique.

    RichC

  3. I think you are right. The piece was not useless, but damned close. The heart rate monitors thing
    was kind of nice, but again quite superficial/limited.

    My guess is that a couple of bike guys on their staff were given a very small budget and a few pages
    to do their report and this is the best they could do with limited resources. I personally would
    have liked to see them add a few a of the often-reviled "department store" models to their
    comparison just to see what 1/3 less than the lowest priced models in their ranges would get them.

    - GRL

    "It's good to want things."

    Steve Barr (philosopher, poet, humorist, chemist, Visual Basic programmer)
    "Rich Clark" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Tom Parker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The latest issue of Consumer Reports (June) just arrived, and they have a small article rating
    bikes, for 3 categories of riders: comfort, fitness, and road. The top-rated bikes were by
    Giant, Giant, and Bianchi, respectively. They didn't care much for the two comfort bikes with
    automatic shift. FYI.

    I was mostly impressed with the quality of the general advice they gave about bike-buying. It
    isn't comprehensive or complete, but it's mostly at least not wrong. They make the case that
    buying at a local bike shop is


    the

    Quoted message said:

    best strategy. And they didn't include any mountain bikes, for once.

    But the test reports are ludicrous. For one thing, they make no mention of the basic reality that
    what they tested is about 1% of what's actually available. Entire major brands are omitted
    entirely. Nothing is said about the brandmates of the bikes they did test. And while the issue of
    fit is mentioned in the text, the connection is not made to the "ratings." The uninitiated buyer
    who wants the "top rated" bike may have trouble understanding why it's not suitable for their
    particular physique.

    RichC

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.