Road Cycling · Public discussion

Consumer Reports bicycle review

Started by David Kerber · · Last activity · 4 posts · 2,357 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
4 June 2004
Last activity
4 June 2004
Original author
David Kerber
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,357
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails,
    comfort bikes and hybrids, though only a relatively few
    models of each one.

    They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying
    from a mass- market retailer was not a good idea except for
    the most casual adult rider, or for a kid who's going to
    outgrow it in a year or two. They mainly pointed out the
    same things we say here, about weight, proper adjustments,
    quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
    good article.

    --
    Dave Kerber Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but
    keep posts in the newsgroups if possible).

  2. David Kerber said:

    Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails,
    comfort bikes and hybrids, though only a relatively few
    models of each one.

    They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying
    from a mass- market retailer was not a good idea except
    for the most casual adult rider, or for a kid who's going
    to outgrow it in a year or two. They mainly pointed out
    the same things we say here, about weight, proper
    adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect,
    but a pretty good article.

    I think that's the one I saw, though IIRC it was about a
    year old. Is it the one that rated Bianchi the best road
    bike? A couple of their comments made me wince, like:

    "Aluminum is stiff but light, steel is more comfortable
    but heavy."

    and

    "Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the
    only thing that absorbs shock."

    Art Harris

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:


    David Kerber said:

    Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails,
    comfort bikes and hybrids, though only a relatively few
    models of each one.

    They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying
    from a mass- market retailer was not a good idea except
    for the most casual adult rider, or for a kid who's
    going to outgrow it in a year or two. They mainly
    pointed out the same things we say here, about weight,
    proper adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not
    perfect, but a pretty good article.

    I think that's the one I saw, though IIRC it was about a
    year old. Is it the one that rated Bianchi the best road
    bike? A couple of their comments made me wince, like:

    "Aluminum is stiff but light, steel is more comfortable
    but heavy."

    and

    "Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is
    the only thing that absorbs shock."

    I believe that was their review of road bikes from last
    year. This one is in the current (June 2004) issue.

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in
    the newsgroups if possible).

  4. maxo said:
    Arthur Harris said:

    "Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is
    the only thing that absorbs shock."

    They should have given tires a shot. I like mine
    real good.

    Write to 'em. You might attatch an article like this one:

    draco.acs.uci.edu8e.2.html

    CR is run by engineer types in pursuit of truth -- unlike
    the dumbass know-it-alls at bike magazines.

    Matt O.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.