Road Cycling · Public discussion

Consumer Reports bicycle review

Started by David Kerber · · Last activity · 5 posts · 551 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
4 June 2004
Last activity
4 June 2004
Original author
David Kerber
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
551
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails, comfort bikes
    and hybrids, though only a relatively few models of each one.

    They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying from a mass-
    market retailer was not a good idea except for the most casual adult
    rider, or for a kid who's going to outgrow it in a year or two. They
    mainly pointed out the same things we say here, about weight, proper
    adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
    good article.

    --
    Dave Kerber
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
    newsgroups if possible).

  2. David Kerber said:

    Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails, comfort bikes
    and hybrids, though only a relatively few models of each one.

    They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying from a mass-
    market retailer was not a good idea except for the most casual adult
    rider, or for a kid who's going to outgrow it in a year or two. They
    mainly pointed out the same things we say here, about weight, proper
    adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
    good article.

    I think that's the one I saw, though IIRC it was about a year old. Is it the
    one that rated Bianchi the best road bike? A couple of their comments made
    me wince, like:

    "Aluminum is stiff but light, steel is more comfortable but heavy."

    and

    "Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
    absorbs shock."

    Art Harris

  3. Arthur Harris said:

    "Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
    absorbs shock."

    They should have given tires a shot. I like mine real good.

    😄

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:


    David Kerber said:

    Did anybody see this? They reviewed FS MTB's, hardtails, comfort bikes
    and hybrids, though only a relatively few models of each one.

    They also had a relatively long sidebar about why buying from a mass-
    market retailer was not a good idea except for the most casual adult
    rider, or for a kid who's going to outgrow it in a year or two. They
    mainly pointed out the same things we say here, about weight, proper
    adjustments, quality of build, etc. Overall, not perfect, but a pretty
    good article.

    I think that's the one I saw, though IIRC it was about a year old. Is it the
    one that rated Bianchi the best road bike? A couple of their comments made
    me wince, like:

    "Aluminum is stiff but light, steel is more comfortable but heavy."

    and

    "Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only thing that
    absorbs shock."

    I believe that was their review of road bikes from last year. This one
    is in the current (June 2004) issue.

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
    newsgroups if possible).

  5. maxo said:
    Arthur Harris said:

    "Road bikes generally don't have shocks, so the frame is the only
    thing that absorbs shock."

    They should have given tires a shot. I like mine real good.

    Write to 'em. You might attatch an article like this one:

    http://draco.acs.uci.edu/rbfaq/FAQ/8e.2.html

    CR is run by engineer types in pursuit of truth -- unlike the dumbass
    know-it-alls at bike magazines.

    Matt O.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.