Quick question...I have noticed that a lot of people use the SRAM gold link on Shimano 9 speed chains. I do know that the SRAM chains are a little wider than HG chains. Although the variance is neglegable (.3mm or something to that effect) the SRAM link seems to work so far. Wipperman chains are pretty much the same width as the Shimano (measured with caliper). So has anyone used a Connex link on a Shimano chain and does it work better than the SRAM?
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
Connex link on Shimano chains
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Equipment
- Published
- 22 July 2003
- Last activity
- 23 July 2003
- Original author
- Bear_Hunter
- Posts
- 2
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 1,488
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
"Bear_Hunter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Quick question...I have noticed that a lot of people use the SRAM gold link on Shimano 9 speed
chains. I do know that the SRAM chains are a little wider than HG chains. Although the variance is
neglegable (.3mm or something to that effect) the SRAM link seems to work so far. Wipperman chains
are pretty much the same width as the Shimano (measured with caliper). So has anyone used a Connex
link on a Shimano chain and does it work better than the SRAM?RLTW
I've used Connex links( 9 speed) on a Sram chain that came on my tandem and it works great. I use
Connex links on my Wipperman equipted road bikes also. I discarded the Sram connector links that
came on the tandem, they were much more difficult to disassemble than the Connex.John
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
newsfeed.comnewsfeed.comOpen ↗ The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19
East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.