Ballerini chose to exclude Conego from the Olympics. This is somewhat
surprising and suggests that he knows something that we have yet to
learn.
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Conego's Surprise
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 20 July 2004
- Last activity
- 21 July 2004
- Original author
- Tom Kunich
- Posts
- 5
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 400
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
(Tom Kunich) said:
Ballerini chose to exclude Conego from the Olympics. This is somewhat
surprising and suggests that he knows something that we have yet to
learn.Not really.
It was something they agreed on.
Cunego will be focusing the remain of this season on the Worlds RR in his
hometown of Verona.The real surprise in Italy's names ofr the Olympics is the absence of
Rebellin. And Davide was training specifically for the August WC races and
the Olympics. -
"Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Ballerini chose to exclude Conego from the Olympics. This is somewhat
surprising and suggests that he knows something that we have yet to
learn.Or something that anyone should see, that his peak was too early in the year
to try and peak again for the Olympics. Personally, I would have given him a
ride anyway and see how he does but Ballerini is all about getting the wins
and takes each choice very seriously. It might be asking too much of this
young guy to peak again for the Olympics. -
"Davide Tosi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
(Tom Kunich) said:
Ballerini chose to exclude Conego from the Olympics. This is somewhat
surprising and suggests that he knows something that we have yet to
learn.Not really.
It was something they agreed on.
Cunego will be focusing the remain of this season on the Worlds RR in his
hometown of Verona.The real surprise in Italy's names ofr the Olympics is the absence of
Rebellin.I agree.
And Davide was training specifically for the August WC races and
Quoted message said:
the Olympics.
Any idea what the reasoning is?
-
"Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Ballerini chose to exclude Conego from the Olympics. This is somewhat
surprising and suggests that he knows something that we have yet to
learn.Or something that anyone should see, that his peak was too early in the
yearQuoted message said:
to try and peak again for the Olympics. Personally, I would have given him
aQuoted message said:
ride anyway and see how he does but Ballerini is all about getting the
winsQuoted message said:
and takes each choice very seriously. It might be asking too much of this
young guy to peak again for the Olympics.Excuse me? He has 6 months to peak a second time. And he plainly showed in
the Giro that off of his peak he's probably faster than anyone else. This
ain't going to last long. LeMond was that sort of superb climber but three
years later he was becoming a moose. Ullrich in '97 could climb like a
rocket ship but two years later he was Sausage-man.Now, granted, Conego is a climber and I assume that the Olympic race only
has enough climbing in it to separate the real racers from the South
Africans. But if the strategy is to employ one day racers, leaving off
Davide Rebellin is disgraceful!
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.